MSFT vs QCOM Stock Comparison: Price, Growth & Valuation (2026)
Use MEXC Stock Compare for a detailed MSFT vs QCOM analysis. Compare MSFT and QCOM across price performance, growth, valuation, profitability and risk, based on market data and the latest reported financials.
MSFT vs QCOM Stock Comparison Summary
MSFT reported year-over-year revenue growth of 17.8%, compared with 1.9% for QCOM. Their P/E ratios are 28.7x and 23.3x, dividend yields are 0.69% and 1.77%, and 30-day volatility levels are 23.4% and 40.5%, respectively. These metrics highlight key differences in growth, valuation, dividend income and market risk. Overall neither stock has a clear lead based on the selected metrics.
Risk Disclaimer: MEXC Stock Compare provides information and comparisons on actual U.S.-listed stocks for reference only. Data may be delayed or inaccurate, does not constitute investment advice, and past performance does not guarantee future results.
MSFT vs QCOM Stock Return Comparison (1W)
Compare the cumulative total returns of Microsoft Corp. (MSFT) and Qualcomm Inc. (QCOM) over the selected 1W period. Data as of 2026-09-25 12:00:00.
MSFT vs QCOM Key Equity Metrics Comparison Summary
Microsoft Corp. (MSFT) has a market capitalization of $3.83T and operates in the Information Technology sector, with its main business classified under Systems Software. Its latest quarterly revenue changed +17.8% year over year.
Qualcomm Inc. (QCOM) has a market capitalization of $212.21B and operates in the Information Technology sector, with its main business classified under Semiconductors. Its latest quarterly revenue changed +1.9% year over year.
MSFT vs QCOM Key Stock Indicators
| Comparison Metric | MSFT | QCOM | Comparison results |
Stock Price & Returns Latest delayed stock price with 1-day, 1-month and year-to-date returns. | $516.111D: +3.7%1M: +0.5%1Y: +0.9% | $202.061D: +4.0%1M: +23.1%1Y: +19.4% | QCOMWin |
Market Capitalization Total market value of the company's outstanding shares. | $3.83T | $212.21B | MSFTWin |
Sector & Industry The company's market sector and primary industry classification. | Information Technology / Systems Software | Information Technology / Semiconductors | -- |
| Based on delayed market data, MSFT is trading at $516.11, compared with $202.06 for QCOM. Their market capitalizations are $3.83T and $212.21B, respectively. Both companies operate in the Information Technology sector. | |||
| MSFT vs QCOM Growth & Profitability | |||
Revenue Growth (YoY) Year-over-year change in revenue. | +17.8% | +1.9% | MSFTWin |
EPS Growth (YoY) Year-over-year change in earnings per share. | +31.7% | -16.6% | MSFTWin |
ROIC Return generated from invested capital. | 26.6% | 26.5% | MSFTWin |
Gross Margin / Operating Margin Profitability before and after operating expenses. | 67.9% / 46.8% | 54.2% / 23.2% | MSFTWin |
| On growth, MSFT posted revenue growth of +17.8% and TTM EPS growth of +31.7%. QCOM, by comparison, posted revenue growth of +1.9% and TTM EPS growth of -16.6%.On profitability, MSFT recorded a gross margin of 67.9%, an operating margin of 46.8%, and ROIC of 26.6%. For QCOM, the corresponding figures were 54.2%, 23.2%, and 26.5%.Overall, MSFT shows stronger overall growth and profitability. | |||
| MSFT vs QCOM Valuation & Balance Sheet | |||
Free Cash Flow Yield Free cash flow as a percentage of market capitalization. | 1.7% | 4.8% | QCOMWin |
Net Debt / EBITDA Net debt relative to EBITDA; a negative value indicates net cash. | 0.1x | 0.8x | MSFTWin |
Dividend Yield / Payout Ratio Dividend returns relative to share price and the share of earnings paid as dividends. | 0.69% / 19.8% | 1.77% / 41.3% | QCOMWin |
| QCOM offers a higher free cash flow yield, indicating a less demanding valuation. MSFT has the stronger balance sheet, while QCOM provides the higher dividend yield. Overall, the two stocks differ mainly in valuation, financial strength and dividend income. | |||
| MSFT vs QCOM Returns & Risk | |||
Total Return (Dividend-Adjusted) Cumulative return over 1, 5 and 10 years, including dividends. | 1Y: +0.9%5Y: +75.5%10Y: +807.2% | 1Y: +19.4%5Y: +51.3%10Y: +224.1% | MSFTWin |
30-Day Realized Volatility Annualized volatility based on the past 30 days of daily returns. | 23.4% | 40.5% | MSFTWin |
Beta (5Y vs S&P 500) Sensitivity to market movements; above 1 indicates greater market volatility. | 1.13 | 1.60 | MSFTWin |
| MSFT has delivered stronger long-term returns, but QCOM also shows higher recent volatility and market sensitivity. | |||
MSFT vs QCOM Valuation & Dividend Metrics
Review MSFT compared with QCOM across valuation, cash flow and dividend metrics, including P/E, forward P/E, free cash flow yield and dividend yield. These figures are provided for reference only and do not represent a fair-value estimate, price target or investment recommendation.
| Metric | MSFT | QCOM | Comparison results |
|---|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $3.83T | $212.21B | MSFTWin |
P/E (TTM) | 28.7x | 23.3x | QCOMWin |
P/S | 11.6x | 4.9x | QCOMWin |
EV/EBITDA | 19.4x | 19.2x | QCOMWin |
Dividend Yield | 0.69% | 1.77% | QCOMWin |
MSFT vs QCOM Profitability Over Time
Compare MSFT and QCOM across gross margin and operating margin trends over time to understand how each company's profitability has changed. Based on reported financial data only; not a forecast or investment advice.
| TTM | 3Y Avg | 5Y Avg | 10Y Avg | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSFT | 68.4% | 68.9% | 68.8% | 67.3% |
| QCOM | 55.4% | 55.8% | 56.5% | 57.7% |
Technical & Fundamental Stock Analysis
RSI (14, daily)
MSFT 63.44 • QCOM 67.37
Measures short-term price momentum and helps identify possible overbought or oversold conditions.
50/200-DMA Position
MSFT 50D Above / 200D Above • QCOM 50D Above / 200D Above
Shows whether the stock is trading above or below its medium- and long-term trend lines.
R&D % of Revenue
MSFT 10.7% • QCOM 22.4%
Shows how much of revenue is invested in research and development.
Share Count Trend (3Y)
MSFT Stable • QCOM Decreased
Shows whether the company's share count has increased or decreased over the past three years.
Company Profiles
Microsoft Corp.
Systems Software
Microsoft develops and licenses consumer and enterprise software. It is known for its Windows operating systems and Office productivity suite. The company is organized into three equally sized broad segments: productivity and business processes (legacy Microsoft Office, cloud-based Office 365, Exchange, SharePoint, Skype, LinkedIn, Dynamics), intelligence cloud (infrastructure- and platform-as-a-service offerings Azure, Windows Server OS, SQL Server), and more personal computing (Windows Client, Xbox, Bing search, display advertising, and Surface laptops, tablets, and desktops).
Qualcomm Inc.
Semiconductors
Qualcomm develops and licenses wireless technology and designs chips for smartphones. The company's key patents revolve around CDMA and OFDMA technologies, which are standards in wireless communications that are the backbone of all 3G, 4G, and 5G networks. Qualcomm's IP is licensed by virtually all wireless device makers. The firm is also the world's largest wireless chip vendor, supplying nearly every premier handset maker with leading-edge processors. Qualcomm also sells RF-front end modules into smartphones, as well as chips into automotive and Internet of Things markets.
Trade MSFT & QCOM Stock Futures on MEXC
Trade USDT-margined Stock Futures referencing MSFT and QCOM on MEXC, with 24/7 access and leverage of up to 10x. These products are derivatives, do not represent ownership of the underlying shares and involve a significant risk of loss.
Everything You Need to Know About MSFT vs QCOM Stocks
What is MEXC Stock Compare?
MEXC Stock Compare is a side-by-side US stock comparison tool. It helps users compare two companies across stock price performance, market cap, valuation, growth, profitability, balance-sheet strength, dividends and risk. The results are provided for research purposes only and do not constitute investment advice.
Which metrics should I use to evaluate a company's growth?
Start with revenue growth to see how quickly the business is expanding, then review EPS growth to determine whether that growth is translating into higher earnings per share. Gross margin, operating margin and ROIC help assess the quality of that growth by showing profitability and capital efficiency. A company with fast revenue growth but declining margins may be expanding without improving its earnings quality.
How do MSFT and QCOM compare in growth and profitability?
In the latest reported period, MSFT recorded revenue growth of +17.8% and TTM EPS growth of +31.7%, compared with +1.9% and -16.6% for QCOM. MSFT leads on both growth and profitability. This comparison is based on reported financial metrics and does not predict future performance.
What is the difference between P/E (TTM) and Forward P/E?
P/E (TTM) compares the current share price with actual earnings reported over the past 12 months. Forward P/E uses estimated earnings for the next 12 months, so it reflects market expectations but depends on forecasts that may change. Both ratios should be considered alongside growth, profitability and industry peers.
How do the risk profiles of MSFT and QCOM compare?
MSFT has a 30-day realized volatility of 23.4% and a five-year Beta of 1.13, compared with 40.5% and 1.60 for QCOM. QCOM shows higher historical volatility and market sensitivity. These indicators describe historical price movements and market sensitivity, but they do not cover every source of investment risk.
What do dividend yield and payout ratio indicate?
Dividend yield shows the annual dividend relative to the current share price, while the payout ratio shows how much of a company's earnings is distributed as dividends. A higher yield may provide more income, but it can also rise because the share price has fallen. Dividend sustainability should therefore be considered together with earnings, cash flow and the payout ratio.
How should I compare a high-growth stock with a lower-valued stock?
A high-growth stock may trade at a higher valuation if investors expect its revenue and earnings to continue expanding. A lower-valued stock may offer a more conservative entry point, but the lower valuation could also reflect slower growth or higher business risk. Growth, valuation, profitability, cash flow and risk should therefore be considered together.
Which is the better stock, MSFT or QCOM?
There is no single answer for every investor. Growth-focused investors may place greater weight on revenue growth, EPS growth and ROIC, while income-focused investors may prioritize dividend yield and payout sustainability. Investors with lower risk tolerance may focus more on volatility, Beta and balance-sheet strength. MEXC Stock Compare presents the relevant metrics but does not provide a buy or sell recommendation.
Can I trade MSFT and QCOM as RealStocks on MEXC?
Eligible users can trade MSFT and QCOM as real US stocks through MEXC RealStocks if both stocks are currently supported. Users must first open and verify a RealStocks account with MEXC's partner licensed broker. RealStocks represents ownership of actual shares rather than tokenized stock exposure. Availability may vary by stock and region, so users should check the corresponding RealStocks trading page before placing an order.
Disclaimer
The stock prices, financial metrics, comparison results and related information displayed on this page are sourced from third-party providers and are provided for informational and educational purposes only. Data may be delayed, incomplete or inaccurate, and MEXC does not guarantee its accuracy, completeness or timeliness. The comparisons and automated summaries do not constitute financial, investment, legal or tax advice, nor a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security or financial product. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Users should independently verify the information and assess their own objectives, financial circumstances and risk tolerance before making any decision. Where MEXC stock futures or other derivative products are referenced, such products do not represent ownership of the underlying shares and may involve leverage and a substantial risk of loss. Product availability is subject to applicable laws and regional restrictions.