JPMorgan says U.S. CLARITY Act could pass by mid-2026, aiming to clarify crypto rules, stablecoin yields, and token oversight. The U.S. crypto industry may soonJPMorgan says U.S. CLARITY Act could pass by mid-2026, aiming to clarify crypto rules, stablecoin yields, and token oversight. The U.S. crypto industry may soon

U.S. CLARITY Act Nears Vote-Is Regulatory Chaos Finally Ending?

2026/03/02 19:00
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

JPMorgan says U.S. CLARITY Act could pass by mid-2026, aiming to clarify crypto rules, stablecoin yields, and token oversight.

The U.S. crypto industry may soon see clearer federal rules as lawmakers move closer to a vote on the CLARITY Act.

JPMorgan analysts say the bill could pass by mid-2026 and may help ease long-standing uncertainty in digital asset markets.

JPMorgan Sees Mid-Year Path Forward

JPMorgan analysts, led by managing director Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou, expect the CLARITY Act to gain approval by mid-year 2026.

The bank said the legislation could act as a catalyst for crypto markets in the second half of the year. The report noted that sentiment remains weak, yet regulatory progress could shift momentum.

The analysts wrote, “While sentiment remains negative in crypto markets, we continue to believe that a potential approval of the market structure legislation most likely by mid-year could serve as a positive catalyst for crypto markets into the second half of the year.”

The bank pointed to ongoing discussions in Washington as a sign that negotiations are active.

The White House has reportedly held several meetings on the bill. However, earlier expectations for progress in March were not met.

Talks continue as lawmakers address unresolved sections of the proposal.

Key Debates: Stablecoins and Ethics Rules

Two major issues remain under discussion. One centers on whether stablecoin issuers can offer yield to holders.

Crypto firms support yield-bearing stablecoins, yet banks argue that such products could draw deposits away from traditional institutions.

Another issue concerns conflict-of-interest limits for public officials.

Some lawmakers seek restrictions that would bar senior government officials and their families from holding or promoting crypto assets.

These provisions remain under review as part of the broader negotiations.

Lawmakers are also discussing how the bill would define oversight roles between agencies.

The proposal aims to clarify which tokens fall under securities or commodities laws. Clear classifications may reduce disputes between regulators and market participants.

Related Reading: JPMorgan Sees Crypto Upside if CLARITY Act Passes

Market Structure and Institutional Access

The CLARITY Act proposes a structured framework for token issuance and trading.

It may introduce lighter registration pathways for new crypto projects. The bill could also define rules for intermediaries such as exchanges and brokers.

The legislation may support tokenization of real-world assets, including bonds and deposits.

Analysts say clearer rules could encourage banks and asset managers to expand blockchain-based services.

Institutional tokenized deposits may receive formal recognition under the framework.

Tax provisions are also under discussion. The bill may provide guidance on small crypto transactions and staking rewards.

Market participants say defined tax treatment could reduce compliance risks. If approved, the law may offer a clearer operating environment for digital assets in the United States.

The post U.S. CLARITY Act Nears Vote-Is Regulatory Chaos Finally Ending? appeared first on Live Bitcoin News.

Market Opportunity
The AI Prophecy Logo
The AI Prophecy Price(ACT)
$0.01396
$0.01396$0.01396
-1.27%
USD
The AI Prophecy (ACT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
South Korea Orders Crypto Custody Overhaul After Police Lose Seized BTC

South Korea Orders Crypto Custody Overhaul After Police Lose Seized BTC

TLDR South Korea introduced new custody rules after police lost seized Bitcoin worth $1.4 million. The Finance Minister confirmed a full inspection of digital asset
Share
Coincentral2026/03/03 01:00
Trump Justice Department’s motion to take Michigan voter rolls misspelled 'United States'

Trump Justice Department’s motion to take Michigan voter rolls misspelled 'United States'

The Justice Department filed an emergency motion at the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals on Monday against the state of Michigan over its refusal to share voter rolls
Share
Alternet2026/03/03 01:25