The ICC can cooperate with private people, and even government officials, says the deputy prosecutorThe ICC can cooperate with private people, and even government officials, says the deputy prosecutor

Ex-marines’ affidavit dragging ICC a ‘deliberate intimidation’ – deputy prosecutor

2026/03/01 12:22
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

THE HAGUE, Netherlands – The deputy prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC) denied the allegation that their investigation in the Philippines was funded by Philippine politicians, and said that photos outing supposed ICC personnel were an act of deliberate intimidation.

“That was certainly deliberately done to intimidate us because I think that normally, our missions…shouldn’t be in the open public and that’s something that shouldn’t be done,” Deputy Prosecutor Mame Mandiaye Niang told Rappler in a one-on-one interview right after the pre-trial hearings against former Philippine president Rodrigo Duterte finished on Friday, February 27.

An affidavit from former marine officers circulated in the Philippines on Day 2 of the pre-trial proceedings, alleging, among others, that they made cash deliveries to former senator Antonio Trillanes IV partly to fund the ICC investigation.

The officers claimed they were asked to be security escorts to the ICC personnel. They identified the supposed ICC team members by name, and included one photo of a woman who is supposedly Chantal Daniels, the Office of the Prosecution’s (OTP) international cooperation adviser.

Trillanes has denied “receiving any amount…for the ICC investigation or any other purpose.”

“I think that you shouldn’t believe any of those kind of things. I think that, you know, the Office of the Prosecution functions through the resources allocated to it by the member state,” said Niang.

“Those are the only resources we use, either through the regular budget or the extra budgetary fund, which is also properly documented,” Niang added.

News of the affidavit surfaced when Filipinos in The Hague were sleeping. It was the talk in the ICC lobby the next morning, before the hearings begin.. The OTP then responded in general terms to reporters, saying all their investigations are funded by the court.

‘Silent partner’?

During his presentation of evidence on Day 3, lead defense counsel Nicholas Kaufman said there is a recorded phone interview where a person “bragged about acting as President [Ferdinand] Marcos, Jr.’s silent partner for channeling witnesses to the ICC.”

According to Kaufman, this “silent partner” went on to say: “They cooperate through me since I don’t hold a position… but we are able to do it.”

Without confirming any of these details, Niang said the prosecution cooperates with many groups and people when they are conducting an investigation, be it a “private person, or even officials of any government including the Philippines.”

“We of course, in our cooperation, be it civil society organization, be it private person, or even member, you know, officials of any government including the Philippines. We can accept cooperation but even in so doing, we retain our independence even you know in terms of who we interview, whether the witnesses we have access to can be important for our case, that’s something we do independently,” said Niang.

Still, Niang said “we try and learn our lesson from that and just try to be more cautious as to next step, what we do, to make sure that also our investigator or our personnel is protected.” – Rappler.com

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
South Korea Orders Crypto Custody Overhaul After Police Lose Seized BTC

South Korea Orders Crypto Custody Overhaul After Police Lose Seized BTC

TLDR South Korea introduced new custody rules after police lost seized Bitcoin worth $1.4 million. The Finance Minister confirmed a full inspection of digital asset
Share
Coincentral2026/03/03 01:00
Trump Justice Department’s motion to take Michigan voter rolls misspelled 'United States'

Trump Justice Department’s motion to take Michigan voter rolls misspelled 'United States'

The Justice Department filed an emergency motion at the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals on Monday against the state of Michigan over its refusal to share voter rolls
Share
Alternet2026/03/03 01:25