Bitwise has publicly criticized MSCI on its proposal of an index rule, which may relegate Strategy to key international indices. The controversy is based on theBitwise has publicly criticized MSCI on its proposal of an index rule, which may relegate Strategy to key international indices. The controversy is based on the

Bitwise Opposes MSCI Rule, Defends Strategy’s Place in Global Indexes

  • Bitwise opposes MSCI’s plan to remove Strategy from major global market indexes.
  • MSCI’s proposed 50% digital asset rule raises concerns over index neutrality.
  • Index exclusion could trigger billions in forced selling by passive funds.

Bitwise has publicly criticized MSCI on its proposal of an index rule, which may relegate Strategy to key international indices. The controversy is based on the categorization of organizations with large Bitcoin accounts. The move may affect investor access, passive fund flows, and subsequent treatment of digital asset companies.

Bitwise, a digital asset fund manager, published its stance on December 12. The company reacted to continued consultation by MSCI on index methodology. It was against reform that would recategorize the companies, such as Strategy. Bitwise declared that these moves undermine the intention of market indexes.

Bitwise Calls for Index Neutrality Amid MSCI Review

The company claimed that the indexes had to be based on the market structure, rather than on business preferences. Bitwise claims that the proposal generated by MSCI presents subjective judgment. It cautioned that this would mislead the investors about the market. Bitwise said index neutrality should be the priority.

The controversy comes after MSCI reviewed Digital Asset Treasury companies. These companies have high amounts of digital assets on their balance sheets. The largest corporate Bitcoin holder, Strategy, is placed at the center of the review. This process started in October at MSCI.

MSCI’s 50% Rule Faces Pushback From Bitwise

MSCI is thinking of the implementation of a 50% rule as part of the review. The proposal would eliminate companies whose digital assets comprise at least half of total assets. MSCI considers these companies to be like investment holding companies. This classification has been severely criticized.

Bitwise disagreed with such reasoning. The company indicated that Strategy is a dynamic business, not a passive investment vehicle. It also contended that exchange-traded products could not reproduce the structure of Strategy. Bitwise concluded that Strategy has provided shareholder value in its approach.

Also Read: Strategy Inc. Opposes MSCI’s Plan to Exclude DATs from Key Indexes

The company also questioned investor influence. Bitwise asserted that the offer would limit contact with the leaders of digital assets. Investors with passive funds would no longer have access to a thriving industry, it warned. Bitwise believes such an approach would disadvantage investors.

Strategy Pushes Back as Saylor Calls MSCI Rule Discriminatory

Strategy has taken its own defense. During the consultation period, Chairman Michael Saylor has been directly involved with MSCI. He described the proposed rule as discriminatory. Saylor stated that index standards should be in line with the global market revolution.

Strategy asserts it is an operating company. The company claims that it uses Bitcoin as a means of supporting long-term equity returns. It refutes assertions that its balance sheet characterizes it as a holding entity. Strategy says that innovation does not bring about exclusion.

Other firms have echoed these concerns. The MSCI has been urged by Strive, an investment corporation, to rethink its proposal. Market analysts have also emphasized the potential risks associated with index removal. JPMorgan added that fears of forced selling have already taken place in Strategy stock.

The pressure is still severe because of the impact of MSCI. MSCI indexes follow trillions of dollars worldwide. An elimination would cause forced sales with index funds. Some projections indicate that the asset could sell for billions of dollars.

MSCI is expected to publish the decision on January 15. The result may influence the treatment of digitally heavy companies by the index providers. A positive decision could lead to greater acceptance of digital assets. This exclusion potential would slacken passive investment throughout the industry.

Also Read: Harvard University Buying More Bitcoin Over Gold, Says Matt Hougan Bitwise CIO

Market Opportunity
Index Cooperative Logo
Index Cooperative Price(INDEX)
$0.5004
$0.5004$0.5004
-1.49%
USD
Index Cooperative (INDEX) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Top 4 Tokens Turning IP Rights Into Investable Assets

Top 4 Tokens Turning IP Rights Into Investable Assets

IP tokenization opens royalties to investors as BeatSwap, Audius, Story Protocol, and Opulous turn music and media rights into on-chain, income-backed assets.
Share
Blockchainreporter2026/01/21 17:45
‘Anti-Innovation’: Experts Slam Nigeria’s ‘Disproportionate’ Capital Requirements for Crypto Firms

‘Anti-Innovation’: Experts Slam Nigeria’s ‘Disproportionate’ Capital Requirements for Crypto Firms

The post ‘Anti-Innovation’: Experts Slam Nigeria’s ‘Disproportionate’ Capital Requirements for Crypto Firms appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The Nigerian SEC
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/21 17:34
Why This New Trending Meme Coin Is Being Dubbed The New PEPE After Record Presale

Why This New Trending Meme Coin Is Being Dubbed The New PEPE After Record Presale

The post Why This New Trending Meme Coin Is Being Dubbed The New PEPE After Record Presale appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto News 17 September 2025 | 20:13 The meme coin market is heating up once again as traders look for the next breakout token. While Shiba Inu (SHIB) continues to build its ecosystem and PEPE holds onto its viral roots, a new contender, Layer Brett (LBRETT), is gaining attention after raising more than $3.7 million in its presale. With a live staking system, fast-growing community, and real tech backing, some analysts are already calling it “the next PEPE.” Here’s the latest on the Shiba Inu price forecast, what’s going on with PEPE, and why Layer Brett is drawing in new investors fast. Shiba Inu price forecast: Ecosystem builds, but retail looks elsewhere Shiba Inu (SHIB) continues to develop its broader ecosystem with Shibarium, the project’s Layer 2 network built to improve speed and lower gas fees. While the community remains strong, the price hasn’t followed suit lately. SHIB is currently trading around $0.00001298, and while that’s a decent jump from its earlier lows, it still falls short of triggering any major excitement across the market. The project includes additional tokens like BONE and LEASH, and also has ongoing initiatives in DeFi and NFTs. However, even with all this development, many investors feel the hype that once surrounded SHIB has shifted elsewhere, particularly toward newer, more dynamic meme coins offering better entry points and incentives. PEPE: Can it rebound or is the momentum gone? PEPE saw a parabolic rise during the last meme coin surge, catching fire on social media and delivering massive short-term gains for early adopters. However, like most meme tokens driven largely by hype, it has since cooled off. PEPE is currently trading around $0.00001076, down significantly from its peak. While the token still enjoys a loyal community, analysts believe its best days may be behind it unless…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:50