AMINA Bank AG joined 21X as its first fully regulated bank participant, connecting institutional-grade custody to the European Union’s only DLT-regulated tradingAMINA Bank AG joined 21X as its first fully regulated bank participant, connecting institutional-grade custody to the European Union’s only DLT-regulated trading

Swiss Crypto Bank Just Became the First Regulated Bank Inside the EU’s Blockchain Trading System

2026/03/10 18:10
3 דקת קריאה
למשוב או לפניות בנוגע לתוכן זה, אנא צור קשר איתנו ב crypto.news@mexc.com

AMINA Bank AG joined 21X as its first fully regulated bank participant, connecting institutional-grade custody to the European Union’s only DLT-regulated trading and settlement infrastructure.

What 21X Actually Is

21X is the first fully regulated distributed ledger technology trading and settlement system operating under the EU’s DLT Pilot Regime. That regulatory designation matters more than it sounds. The DLT Pilot Regime is a controlled sandbox framework the European Union created specifically to allow blockchain-based financial market infrastructure to operate under real regulatory oversight rather than in a gray zone. It is not an exemption from regulation. It is regulation designed for blockchain settlement from the ground up.

The platform operates on Polygon and Stellar blockchains, with Chainlink, Circle, and SBI Digital Markets providing smart contract matching and settlement infrastructure. Tokeny supplies the technical issuance layer. AMINA now sits at the top of that stack as the institutional custody and banking layer for underlying assets including government bonds and corporate securities.

Atomic settlement is the technical mechanism the system uses. Traditional securities settlement operates on a T+2 cycle, meaning two business days between trade execution and final transfer of ownership. Atomic settlement means the asset and the payment transfer simultaneously in the same transaction, eliminating counterparty risk during the settlement window entirely. For institutional investors, that compression of settlement risk is one of the most concrete operational improvements blockchain infrastructure offers over legacy systems.

Why the First Bank Participant Is Significant

The RWA active address data published yesterday showed tokenized public equity with 21,705 active addresses and tokenized US Treasury debt with 1,363. The infrastructure exists. The users are not yet there at scale. The barrier cited most consistently by institutional participants is interoperability, meaning tokenized assets that live on one platform cannot easily move to another, fragmenting liquidity and making large-scale adoption operationally complex.

$4.58 Billion in Token Unlocks Are Coming This Week

AMINA’s role as listing sponsor addresses part of that problem by providing a single regulated banking relationship that connects traditional asset custody to blockchain settlement rails. An institution holding government bonds through AMINA can access 21X’s secondary market without navigating multiple custodial relationships or compliance frameworks. The end-to-end infrastructure argument, one bank covering custody, issuance via Tokeny, and secondary market access via 21X, reduces the integration complexity that has slowed institutional adoption.

The ERC-3643 compliance standard embedded in the smart contract layer automates governance requirements for tokenized equities and funds. Automated compliance means the token itself enforces transfer restrictions, investor eligibility checks, and reporting requirements without manual intervention at each transaction. For compliance teams at large institutions, that automation reduces operational overhead significantly.

The Market Context This Enters

Tokenized real-world assets reached approximately $26.5 billion in early 2026. That figure has grown consistently but remains small relative to the traditional securities markets it is designed to supplement. The Nasdaq and Kraken partnership announced yesterday targets tokenized stocks for retail distribution. Aon’s stablecoin premium settlement pilot tested blockchain payment rails in insurance. AMINA joining 21X adds regulated bank infrastructure to EU-based tokenized securities trading.

Three separate developments in two days all point toward the same direction: regulated institutions building the compliance infrastructure that must exist before tokenized securities can scale beyond early adopters. The $26.5 billion in current RWA value will either grow significantly as that infrastructure matures or plateau if interoperability and custody problems remain unsolved. AMINA’s participation is one piece of the solution. It is not the whole answer.

The post Swiss Crypto Bank Just Became the First Regulated Bank Inside the EU’s Blockchain Trading System appeared first on ETHNews.

הזדמנות שוק
Lorenzo Protocol סֵמֶל
Lorenzo Protocol מְחִיר(BANK)
$0.03915
$0.03915$0.03915
-0.43%
USD
Lorenzo Protocol (BANK) טבלת מחירים חיה
הצהרת סיכום: המאמרים המתפרסמים מחדש באתר זה מקורם בפלטפורמות ציבוריות ונמסרים לצרכי מידע בלבד. הם אינם משקפים בהכרח את עמדותיה של MEXC. כל הזכויות שמורות למחברים המקוריים. אם אתה סבור שתוכן כלשהו מפר זכויות צד שלישי, אנא צרו קשר עם crypto.news@mexc.com לבקשת הסרה. MEXC אינה מתחייבת לדיוק, לשלמות או לעדכניות התוכן, ואינה אחראית לכל פעולה שתינקט על סמך המידע המסופק. התוכן אינו מהווה ייעוץ פיננסי, משפטי או מקצועי אחר, ואין לראות בו המלצה או אישור מטעם MEXC.

אולי תאהב גם

Winklevoss Twins Move $130M Bitcoin to Gemini Wallets

Winklevoss Twins Move $130M Bitcoin to Gemini Wallets

Crypto investors are watching the latest moves from twins Cameron Winklevoss and Tyler Winklevoss. According to blockchain tracking data, wallets linked to the
לַחֲלוֹק
Coinfomania2026/03/10 20:12
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
לַחֲלוֹק
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00
What to Expect in Laptop Rental Services: A Cost Breakdown

What to Expect in Laptop Rental Services: A Cost Breakdown

Laptop rental services are emerging as a popular choice. This is true, especially among businesses that require temporary equipment. Renting a laptop can be an
לַחֲלוֹק
Techbullion2026/03/10 20:05