President Donald Trump has been complaining that unless Republicans pass legislation to drastically restrict voting rights, they will lose in November.Writing forPresident Donald Trump has been complaining that unless Republicans pass legislation to drastically restrict voting rights, they will lose in November.Writing for

Trump's huge mistakes could mean Republicans losing the Senate

2026/03/16 21:07
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

President Donald Trump has been complaining that unless Republicans pass legislation to drastically restrict voting rights, they will lose in November.

Writing for MS NOW, Kevin Frey and Jack Fitzpatrick explained that the election overhaul bill known as the SAVE Act, would turn voting into a disaster, particularly for married women and the elderly. Things could be even worse for any military members stationed overseas and who may not have access to the documents necessary to cast a ballot, much less be able to get a photo I.D. that would be acceptable under the requirements in the law.

Currently, only five states indicate citizenship on the "Real ID." About 51 percent of Americans have a valid U.S. passport, USA Today reported. To vote, the name on the passport must match the name on the voter registration. The bill would also end "no excuse" mail-in voting. Several states prioritize mail elections over in-person voting.

All of the new rules would make it more difficult to vote in a year when Republicans aren't all that excited about it, which could be a shot in the foot. Last month's Washington Post-ABC-Ipsos poll showed that only about half of the Trump 2024 voters say they are guaranteed to vote. By contrast, 77 percent of Kamala Harris voters intend to vote. Any barriers to voting could easily turn reluctant voters into non-voters.

"Trump has also threatened to refuse to sign any other legislation until the bill passes. But rather than building momentum, the president’s pressure campaign has exposed deep divisions among Republicans over whether to upend the Senate’s rules to force the bill through," the report said.

The bill will likely fail, coming short of the 60-vote threshold required to end any filibuster. So, Trump has demanded that Republicans kill the filibuster. It's something that Republicans have been resistant to doing, thus far. But the GOP is still pressing.

The only solution the Senate GOP can come up with is a slate of floor speeches where members can talk as long as they want about the measure. Democrats, who generally support all Americans voting, are ready for a fight.

Eliminating the filibuster has generally been known as the "nuclear option." The biggest problem that Republicans face, however, is that if they kill the filibuster this year and lose the 2026 midterm elections, it could destroy whatever future legislation that Republicans want to stop in a new session of the legislature.

Some far-right Republican stawarts are all for it. Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.), who will be out of the U.S. Senate next year, called on his colleagues, “do it anyway.”

Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) suggested holding a vote on the rules to see whether it would pass. It sets up another conflict with President Donald Trump.

Sen. Ted Budd (R-N.C.) said he’s “hesitant” to kill the filibuster and lower the 60-vote rule, arguing he doesn’t want to “harm the long-term protections of the Senate, because I think that would ultimately hurt North Carolinians.”

“The practicality of doing it just isn’t apparent to me, simply because as soon as you start talking about amendments, the clock resets, and this will go on week after week, month after month — chew up the rest of the year,” said Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.) told MS NOW Thursday.

As it stands, if they held a vote on changing the rules, it would not pass.

  • george conway
  • noam chomsky
  • civil war
  • Kayleigh mcenany
  • Melania trump
  • drudge report
  • paul krugman
  • Lindsey graham
  • Lincoln project
  • al franken bill maher
  • People of praise
  • Ivanka trump
  • eric trump
Market Opportunity
OFFICIAL TRUMP Logo
OFFICIAL TRUMP Price(TRUMP)
$3.908
$3.908$3.908
+2.11%
USD
OFFICIAL TRUMP (TRUMP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

And the Big Day Has Arrived: The Anticipated News for XRP and Dogecoin Tomorrow

And the Big Day Has Arrived: The Anticipated News for XRP and Dogecoin Tomorrow

The first-ever ETFs for XRP and Dogecoin are expected to launch in the US tomorrow. Here's what you need to know. Continue Reading: And the Big Day Has Arrived: The Anticipated News for XRP and Dogecoin Tomorrow
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 04:33
Swiss Franc Intervention: Critical Analysis of SNB’s 2025 Policy and Safe-Haven Resilience

Swiss Franc Intervention: Critical Analysis of SNB’s 2025 Policy and Safe-Haven Resilience

BitcoinWorld Swiss Franc Intervention: Critical Analysis of SNB’s 2025 Policy and Safe-Haven Resilience ZURICH, March 2025 – The Swiss National Bank faces mounting
Share
bitcoinworld2026/03/16 23:10
Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26