TLDR 63% of Gen Z use social media for investment tips, risking bad advice. 64% trust AI platforms, but ASIC warns unlicensed guidance is unsafe. Nearly 1 in 4 TLDR 63% of Gen Z use social media for investment tips, risking bad advice. 64% trust AI platforms, but ASIC warns unlicensed guidance is unsafe. Nearly 1 in 4

ASIC Warns Gen Z Against Social Media and AI Investment Advice as Crypto Ownership Hits 23%

2026/03/16 20:39
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

TLDR

  • 63% of Gen Z use social media for investment tips, risking bad advice.
  • 64% trust AI platforms, but ASIC warns unlicensed guidance is unsafe.
  • Nearly 1 in 4 young Aussies own crypto, often trading on social trends.
  • Engagement-driven content can mislead users into high-risk financial moves.
  • ASIC urges licensed advice for crypto, superannuation, and trading decisions

Australia’s financial regulator, ASIC, has highlighted rising risks as Gen Z increasingly relies on social media and AI for financial guidance. The survey showed that 63% of young Australians use social media for investment information, while 18% consult AI platforms. ASIC reported that this trend may expose users to misleading advice and high-risk financial products.

The findings reveal that 56% of Gen Z trusts financial information on social media, and 64% place trust in AI platforms. ASIC has previously acted against unlicensed influencers promoting high-risk products. The regulator emphasized that proper licensing is required for any financial recommendations, including those derived from digital platforms.

The survey covered 1,127 Australians aged 18 to 28 and highlighted that 30% use YouTube for financial content. ASIC’s focus remains on preventing harm from inaccurate financial guidance. The regulator’s data show that reliance on engagement-focused content often outweighs search for reliable sources.

Social Media Driving Risky Financial Decisions

ASIC noted that young Australians are turning to influencers who may lack proper financial expertise. Nearly one in four Gen Z participants owns cryptocurrency, and 29% make trades influenced by social media content. The regulator highlighted that such content may create unrealistic expectations about returns and market stability.

Social media trends have pushed many to switch retirement funds without understanding associated risks. ASIC explained that superannuation, Australia’s $4.5 trillion retirement fund market, is increasingly targeted by unqualified advisors online. The regulator is concerned that impulsive changes may lead to long-term financial harm.

ASIC’s data suggest that engagement-driven content often disguises promotional material as advice. Young users frequently struggle to differentiate between credible sources and marketing strategies. The regulator warns that unchecked social media guidance can lead to substantial financial losses.

Crypto Adoption Among Gen Z Sparks Regulatory Attention

The survey found that 23% of Gen Z Australians hold cryptocurrency, reflecting significant market adoption. ASIC is tracking firms integrating AI tools to provide personalized crypto trading suggestions. The regulator warns that unlicensed advice or AI recommendations may violate financial regulations.

Crypto companies have introduced bots to assist trading, increasing exposure for inexperienced users. ASIC stressed that advice tailored to individual circumstances must come from licensed entities. This regulatory focus underscores the importance of accountability in emerging financial technologies.

ASIC’s ongoing analysis also includes online marketing campaigns promoting crypto investments. The regulator highlighted that some campaigns encourage participation in scams or high-risk products. These findings reinforce ASIC’s commitment to ensuring young investors receive accurate and legally compliant financial information.

The post ASIC Warns Gen Z Against Social Media and AI Investment Advice as Crypto Ownership Hits 23% appeared first on CoinCentral.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

And the Big Day Has Arrived: The Anticipated News for XRP and Dogecoin Tomorrow

And the Big Day Has Arrived: The Anticipated News for XRP and Dogecoin Tomorrow

The first-ever ETFs for XRP and Dogecoin are expected to launch in the US tomorrow. Here's what you need to know. Continue Reading: And the Big Day Has Arrived: The Anticipated News for XRP and Dogecoin Tomorrow
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 04:33
Swiss Franc Intervention: Critical Analysis of SNB’s 2025 Policy and Safe-Haven Resilience

Swiss Franc Intervention: Critical Analysis of SNB’s 2025 Policy and Safe-Haven Resilience

BitcoinWorld Swiss Franc Intervention: Critical Analysis of SNB’s 2025 Policy and Safe-Haven Resilience ZURICH, March 2025 – The Swiss National Bank faces mounting
Share
bitcoinworld2026/03/16 23:10
Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26