Calling vape products 'poison,' the Department of Health urges lawmakers to prohibit — not just regulate — vaping in the PhilippinesCalling vape products 'poison,' the Department of Health urges lawmakers to prohibit — not just regulate — vaping in the Philippines

DOH, health experts push for total vape ban to protect youth

2026/03/16 20:00
5 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

MANILA, Philippines – To better protect the youth against health risks brought by vaping, experts proposed stricter measures during a Senate health committee hearing on various bills seeking to regulate e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products (HTPs) on Monday, March 16.

The Department of Health (DOH), along with health experts and researchers, proposed a total ban on vapes, HTPs, and other nicotine products on the market.

“There are already eight [Southeast Asian] countries who are already banning vape in their countries, and it is only in the Philippines, Malaysia, and Indonesia where vape is under regulation and not banned,” DOH Health Promotion Bureau Director Tina Marasigan said in a mix of English and Filipino.

Nowadays, vapes and HTPs are not the only options for nicotine products. There are nicotine e-liquids, lozenges, pouches, gums, and salts.

“Kahit may polisiya para mag-regulate sa e-cigarette at vape, hindi po natin ito nararamdaman dahil dumarami pa rin po ang gumagamit ng lasong ito. Ang total ban ang magpapasimple ng enforcement dahil hindi na kailangang ihiwalay ang ilegal sa legal. Dahil kahit ano man po sa heated tobacco products, nic salt, at freebase vape – lahat po ‘yan ay lason,” read Marasigan from the DOH’s general manifestation.

(Even though there is a policy to regulate e-cigarettes and vapes, we don’t feel it because the number of people using this poison is still increasing. A total ban will simplify enforcement because there is no need to separate the illegal from the legal. Anything from heated tobacco products and nic salts to freebase vape — all of them are poison.)

Health experts have long said that it is misleading to advertise vapes as less harmful than cigarettes, since they still contain toxic chemicals.

The DOH has been warning that usage of vapes and other nicotine products raises the risk of illnesses such as lung diseases, upper respiratory infections, cardiovascular diseases, immune system conditions, and cancer, among others.

Cases of e-cigarette or vaping use–associated lung injury or EVALI have also been recorded in the Philippines, including one death — a 22-year-old male whose case was reported in 2024.

Dr. Rizalina Gonzalez, chairperson of the Philippine Pediatric Society’s Tobacco Control Advocacy Group, compared how a smoker absorbs around 1 milligram of nicotine per cigarette stick, while vapes can have as high as 65 milligrams per milliliter, based on the law and existing regulations of the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI).

‘Marketed for children’

Current regulations also leave loopholes for vapes to reach the youth, potentially leading to further nicotine addiction. Data from the Department of Science and Technology–Food and Nutrition Research Institute showed that the number of Filipino youth using vapes soared more than 1,000% from 37,513 in 2021 to 423,185 in 2023.

Gonzalez cited findings from one of their school surveys in 2025 showing that more than 60% of students had tried e-cigarettes.

“It is online, it is available in retail stores, and the proliferation of 24/7 vape shops, even though there is an age restriction of 18 [years old]…. [The products are] attractive. The colors, there are cartoon characters, there are fruit flavors; there are actually flavors which are marketed as fruits, desserts, and all…. There [are] lanyards, the jackets [as merchandise]…. So, who is the target? I don’t think it’s adults; they are marketed for children,” Gonzalez said.

Trade Assistant Secretary Marcus Valdez II noted that sellers have become elusive, selling inside residential areas and using altered product names online.

“We have Meta, Lazada, Shopee, and TikTok Shop — primarily it’s their sellers onboarded in the platforms that are selling substandard products or unlicensed products, which include vape,” Valdez said.

The DTI confiscated products worth P519 million in 2025 alone. In August last year, the trade department also ordered e-commerce platforms to remove illegal vape listings within seven days. These sites were reminded to comply with Republic Act No. 11900 or the Vaporized Nicotine and Non-Nicotine Products Regulation Act and RA 11967 or the Internet Transactions Act.

Philippines as ‘global ashtray’?

Former DOH officials across administrations are backing the call for a total vape ban, including ex-secretaries Jaime Galvez Tan, Carmencita Reodica, Manuel Dayrit, Esperanza Cabral, Enrique Ona, Paulyn Rosell-Ubial, and Francisco Duque III.

“We are losing ground compared to our [Southeast Asian] neighbors who have already enforced a total vape ban. We fear we will become the dumping ground — as if a global ashtray — for vapes that other countries will reject,” they said in a joint statement on Monday.

“At this critical moment, the fastest and most comprehensive way to stop the expansion of youth nicotine addiction is to remove vapes, heated tobacco products, and other electronic nicotine delivery systems from the market. Partial restrictions and fiscal intervention do not suffice to stem the tide of nicotine addiction among our youth.”

The former DOH officials added that the long-term goal should be to phase out all tobacco and nicotine products.

The Senate health committee, chaired by Senator Risa Hontiveros, will convene a technical working group to create a consolidated bill that could seek to totally ban vapes or increase the age restriction to 21 or 25 years old, from the current 18 years old. – Rappler.com

Market Opportunity
Comedian Logo
Comedian Price(BAN)
$0.1375
$0.1375$0.1375
-1.02%
USD
Comedian (BAN) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

And the Big Day Has Arrived: The Anticipated News for XRP and Dogecoin Tomorrow

And the Big Day Has Arrived: The Anticipated News for XRP and Dogecoin Tomorrow

The first-ever ETFs for XRP and Dogecoin are expected to launch in the US tomorrow. Here's what you need to know. Continue Reading: And the Big Day Has Arrived: The Anticipated News for XRP and Dogecoin Tomorrow
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 04:33
Swiss Franc Intervention: Critical Analysis of SNB’s 2025 Policy and Safe-Haven Resilience

Swiss Franc Intervention: Critical Analysis of SNB’s 2025 Policy and Safe-Haven Resilience

BitcoinWorld Swiss Franc Intervention: Critical Analysis of SNB’s 2025 Policy and Safe-Haven Resilience ZURICH, March 2025 – The Swiss National Bank faces mounting
Share
bitcoinworld2026/03/16 23:10
Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26