BitcoinWorld Unlocking Predictability: Thinking Machines Lab’s Revolutionary Push for AI Consistency In the fast-paced world of technology, where even the slightest unpredictability can have significant financial implications, the quest for reliable artificial intelligence has become paramount. For those invested in cryptocurrencies and other high-stakes digital assets, the stability and accuracy of underlying AI systems, from market analysis tools to decentralized application components, are not just desirable but essential. Imagine an AI predicting market trends or executing trades; its consistency is as crucial as the security of the blockchain itself. This is precisely the frontier that Mira Murati’s highly anticipated Thinking Machines Lab is set to revolutionize. The Critical Need for Consistent AI Models For too long, the AI community has largely accepted a fundamental challenge: the inherent nondeterminism of large language models (LLMs). If you’ve ever asked ChatGPT the same question multiple times, you’ve likely received a spectrum of answers, each slightly different. While this variability can sometimes mimic human creativity, it poses a significant hurdle for applications requiring absolute precision and reliability. Consider enterprise solutions, scientific research, or even advanced financial modeling – consistent outputs are not a luxury; they are a necessity. This is where the work of Thinking Machines Lab steps in, challenging the status quo and aiming to engineer a new era of predictable and trustworthy AI models. The problem of nondeterminism manifests in several ways: Lack of Reproducibility: Researchers struggle to replicate experimental results, slowing down scientific progress. Enterprise Adoption Challenges: Businesses hesitate to deploy AI in critical functions if they cannot guarantee consistent outcomes. Debugging Difficulties: Diagnosing errors in AI systems becomes exponentially harder when outputs vary randomly. Mira Murati, formerly OpenAI’s chief technology officer, has assembled an all-star team of researchers, backed by an astounding $2 billion in seed funding. Their mission, as unveiled in their first research blog post titled “Defeating Nondeterminism in LLM Inference” on their new platform “Connectionism,” is clear: to tackle this foundational problem head-on. They believe that the randomness isn’t an unchangeable fact of AI, but a solvable engineering challenge. Decoding Nondeterminism in LLM Inference The groundbreaking research from Thinking Machines Lab, specifically detailed by researcher Horace He, delves into the technical underpinnings of this nondeterminism. He argues that the root cause lies not in the high-level algorithms but in the intricate orchestration of GPU kernels. These small programs, which run inside powerful Nvidia computer chips, are the workhorses of AI inference – the process that generates responses after you input a query into an LLM. During LLM inference, billions of calculations are performed simultaneously across numerous GPU cores. The way these kernels are scheduled, executed, and their results aggregated can introduce tiny, almost imperceptible variations. These variations, when compounded across the vast number of operations in a large model, lead to the noticeable differences in outputs we observe. Horace He’s hypothesis is that by gaining meticulous control over this low-level orchestration layer, it is possible to eliminate or significantly reduce this randomness. This isn’t just about tweaking a few parameters; it’s about fundamentally rethinking how AI computations are managed at the hardware-software interface. This approach highlights a shift in focus: From Algorithms to Orchestration: Moving beyond model architecture to the underlying computational execution. Hardware-Aware AI: Recognizing the profound impact of hardware-software interaction on model behavior. Precision Engineering: Applying rigorous engineering principles to AI inference processes. This level of control could unlock unprecedented reliability, making AI systems behave more like traditional deterministic software, where the same input always yields the same output. Why AI Consistency is a Game-Changer for Innovation The implications of achieving true AI consistency are vast and transformative, extending far beyond simply getting the same answer twice from ChatGPT. For enterprises, it means building trust in AI-powered applications, from customer service chatbots that always provide uniform information to automated financial analysis tools that generate identical reports given the same data. Imagine the confidence businesses would have in deploying AI for critical decision-making processes if they could guarantee reproducible outcomes. In the scientific community, the ability to generate reproducible AI responses is nothing short of revolutionary. Scientific progress relies heavily on the ability to replicate experiments and verify results. If AI models are used for data analysis, simulation, or hypothesis generation, their outputs must be consistent for findings to be considered credible and build upon. Horace He further notes that this consistency could dramatically improve reinforcement learning (RL) training. RL is a powerful method where AI models learn by receiving rewards for correct actions. However, if the AI’s responses are constantly shifting, the reward signals become noisy, making the learning process inefficient and prolonged. Smoother, more consistent responses would lead to: Faster Training: Clearer reward signals accelerate the learning curve. More Robust Models: Training on consistent data leads to more stable and reliable AI. Reduced Data Noise: Eliminating variability in responses cleans up the training data, improving overall model quality. The Information previously reported that Thinking Machines Lab plans to leverage RL to customize AI models for businesses. This suggests a direct link between their current research into consistency and their future product offerings, aiming to deliver highly reliable, tailor-made AI solutions for various industries. Such developments could profoundly impact sectors ranging from healthcare and manufacturing to finance and logistics, where precision and reliability are paramount. Thinking Machines Lab: A New Era of Reproducible AI The launch of their research blog, “Connectionism,” signals Thinking Machines Lab‘s commitment to transparency and open research, a refreshing stance in an increasingly secretive AI landscape. This inaugural post, part of an effort to “benefit the public, but also improve our own research culture,” echoes the early ideals of organizations like OpenAI. However, as OpenAI grew, its commitment to open research seemingly diminished. The tech world will be watching closely to see if Murati’s lab can maintain this ethos while navigating the pressures of a $12 billion valuation and the competitive AI market. Murati herself indicated in July that the lab’s first product would be unveiled in the coming months, designed to be “useful for researchers and startups developing custom models.” While it remains speculative whether this initial product will directly incorporate the techniques from their nondeterminism research, the focus on foundational problems suggests a long-term vision. By tackling core issues like reproducibility, Thinking Machines Lab is not just building new applications; it’s laying the groundwork for a more stable and trustworthy AI ecosystem. The journey to create truly reproducible AI is ambitious, but if successful, it could solidify Thinking Machines Lab’s position as a leader at the frontier of AI research, setting new standards for reliability and paving the way for a new generation of dependable intelligent systems. The Road Ahead: Challenges and Opportunities for Thinking Machines Lab The venture of Thinking Machines Lab is not without its challenges. Operating with a $12 billion valuation brings immense pressure to deliver not just groundbreaking research but also commercially viable products. The technical hurdles in precisely controlling GPU kernel orchestration are formidable, requiring deep expertise in both hardware and software. Furthermore, the broader AI community’s long-standing acceptance of nondeterminism means that TML is effectively challenging a deeply ingrained paradigm. Success will require not only solving the technical problem but also demonstrating its practical benefits convincingly to a global audience. However, the opportunities are equally immense. By solving the problem of AI consistency, Thinking Machines Lab could become the standard-bearer for reliable AI, attracting partners and customers across every industry. Their commitment to sharing research publicly, through platforms like Connectionism, could foster a collaborative environment, accelerating innovation across the entire AI ecosystem. If they can successfully integrate their research into products that make AI models more predictable, they will not only justify their valuation but also fundamentally alter how businesses and scientists interact with artificial intelligence, making it a more dependable and indispensable tool for progress. In conclusion, Thinking Machines Lab’s bold foray into defeating nondeterminism in LLM inference represents a pivotal moment in AI development. By striving for greater AI consistency, Mira Murati and her team are addressing a core limitation that has hindered broader AI adoption in critical sectors. Their focus on the intricate details of GPU kernel orchestration demonstrates a profound commitment to foundational research, promising a future where AI models are not just powerful but also reliably predictable. This endeavor has the potential to unlock new levels of trust and utility for artificial intelligence, making it a truly revolutionary force across all industries, including the dynamic world of digital assets and blockchain technology. To learn more about the latest AI models trends, explore our article on key developments shaping AI features. This post Unlocking Predictability: Thinking Machines Lab’s Revolutionary Push for AI Consistency first appeared on BitcoinWorld and is written by Editorial TeamBitcoinWorld Unlocking Predictability: Thinking Machines Lab’s Revolutionary Push for AI Consistency In the fast-paced world of technology, where even the slightest unpredictability can have significant financial implications, the quest for reliable artificial intelligence has become paramount. For those invested in cryptocurrencies and other high-stakes digital assets, the stability and accuracy of underlying AI systems, from market analysis tools to decentralized application components, are not just desirable but essential. Imagine an AI predicting market trends or executing trades; its consistency is as crucial as the security of the blockchain itself. This is precisely the frontier that Mira Murati’s highly anticipated Thinking Machines Lab is set to revolutionize. The Critical Need for Consistent AI Models For too long, the AI community has largely accepted a fundamental challenge: the inherent nondeterminism of large language models (LLMs). If you’ve ever asked ChatGPT the same question multiple times, you’ve likely received a spectrum of answers, each slightly different. While this variability can sometimes mimic human creativity, it poses a significant hurdle for applications requiring absolute precision and reliability. Consider enterprise solutions, scientific research, or even advanced financial modeling – consistent outputs are not a luxury; they are a necessity. This is where the work of Thinking Machines Lab steps in, challenging the status quo and aiming to engineer a new era of predictable and trustworthy AI models. The problem of nondeterminism manifests in several ways: Lack of Reproducibility: Researchers struggle to replicate experimental results, slowing down scientific progress. Enterprise Adoption Challenges: Businesses hesitate to deploy AI in critical functions if they cannot guarantee consistent outcomes. Debugging Difficulties: Diagnosing errors in AI systems becomes exponentially harder when outputs vary randomly. Mira Murati, formerly OpenAI’s chief technology officer, has assembled an all-star team of researchers, backed by an astounding $2 billion in seed funding. Their mission, as unveiled in their first research blog post titled “Defeating Nondeterminism in LLM Inference” on their new platform “Connectionism,” is clear: to tackle this foundational problem head-on. They believe that the randomness isn’t an unchangeable fact of AI, but a solvable engineering challenge. Decoding Nondeterminism in LLM Inference The groundbreaking research from Thinking Machines Lab, specifically detailed by researcher Horace He, delves into the technical underpinnings of this nondeterminism. He argues that the root cause lies not in the high-level algorithms but in the intricate orchestration of GPU kernels. These small programs, which run inside powerful Nvidia computer chips, are the workhorses of AI inference – the process that generates responses after you input a query into an LLM. During LLM inference, billions of calculations are performed simultaneously across numerous GPU cores. The way these kernels are scheduled, executed, and their results aggregated can introduce tiny, almost imperceptible variations. These variations, when compounded across the vast number of operations in a large model, lead to the noticeable differences in outputs we observe. Horace He’s hypothesis is that by gaining meticulous control over this low-level orchestration layer, it is possible to eliminate or significantly reduce this randomness. This isn’t just about tweaking a few parameters; it’s about fundamentally rethinking how AI computations are managed at the hardware-software interface. This approach highlights a shift in focus: From Algorithms to Orchestration: Moving beyond model architecture to the underlying computational execution. Hardware-Aware AI: Recognizing the profound impact of hardware-software interaction on model behavior. Precision Engineering: Applying rigorous engineering principles to AI inference processes. This level of control could unlock unprecedented reliability, making AI systems behave more like traditional deterministic software, where the same input always yields the same output. Why AI Consistency is a Game-Changer for Innovation The implications of achieving true AI consistency are vast and transformative, extending far beyond simply getting the same answer twice from ChatGPT. For enterprises, it means building trust in AI-powered applications, from customer service chatbots that always provide uniform information to automated financial analysis tools that generate identical reports given the same data. Imagine the confidence businesses would have in deploying AI for critical decision-making processes if they could guarantee reproducible outcomes. In the scientific community, the ability to generate reproducible AI responses is nothing short of revolutionary. Scientific progress relies heavily on the ability to replicate experiments and verify results. If AI models are used for data analysis, simulation, or hypothesis generation, their outputs must be consistent for findings to be considered credible and build upon. Horace He further notes that this consistency could dramatically improve reinforcement learning (RL) training. RL is a powerful method where AI models learn by receiving rewards for correct actions. However, if the AI’s responses are constantly shifting, the reward signals become noisy, making the learning process inefficient and prolonged. Smoother, more consistent responses would lead to: Faster Training: Clearer reward signals accelerate the learning curve. More Robust Models: Training on consistent data leads to more stable and reliable AI. Reduced Data Noise: Eliminating variability in responses cleans up the training data, improving overall model quality. The Information previously reported that Thinking Machines Lab plans to leverage RL to customize AI models for businesses. This suggests a direct link between their current research into consistency and their future product offerings, aiming to deliver highly reliable, tailor-made AI solutions for various industries. Such developments could profoundly impact sectors ranging from healthcare and manufacturing to finance and logistics, where precision and reliability are paramount. Thinking Machines Lab: A New Era of Reproducible AI The launch of their research blog, “Connectionism,” signals Thinking Machines Lab‘s commitment to transparency and open research, a refreshing stance in an increasingly secretive AI landscape. This inaugural post, part of an effort to “benefit the public, but also improve our own research culture,” echoes the early ideals of organizations like OpenAI. However, as OpenAI grew, its commitment to open research seemingly diminished. The tech world will be watching closely to see if Murati’s lab can maintain this ethos while navigating the pressures of a $12 billion valuation and the competitive AI market. Murati herself indicated in July that the lab’s first product would be unveiled in the coming months, designed to be “useful for researchers and startups developing custom models.” While it remains speculative whether this initial product will directly incorporate the techniques from their nondeterminism research, the focus on foundational problems suggests a long-term vision. By tackling core issues like reproducibility, Thinking Machines Lab is not just building new applications; it’s laying the groundwork for a more stable and trustworthy AI ecosystem. The journey to create truly reproducible AI is ambitious, but if successful, it could solidify Thinking Machines Lab’s position as a leader at the frontier of AI research, setting new standards for reliability and paving the way for a new generation of dependable intelligent systems. The Road Ahead: Challenges and Opportunities for Thinking Machines Lab The venture of Thinking Machines Lab is not without its challenges. Operating with a $12 billion valuation brings immense pressure to deliver not just groundbreaking research but also commercially viable products. The technical hurdles in precisely controlling GPU kernel orchestration are formidable, requiring deep expertise in both hardware and software. Furthermore, the broader AI community’s long-standing acceptance of nondeterminism means that TML is effectively challenging a deeply ingrained paradigm. Success will require not only solving the technical problem but also demonstrating its practical benefits convincingly to a global audience. However, the opportunities are equally immense. By solving the problem of AI consistency, Thinking Machines Lab could become the standard-bearer for reliable AI, attracting partners and customers across every industry. Their commitment to sharing research publicly, through platforms like Connectionism, could foster a collaborative environment, accelerating innovation across the entire AI ecosystem. If they can successfully integrate their research into products that make AI models more predictable, they will not only justify their valuation but also fundamentally alter how businesses and scientists interact with artificial intelligence, making it a more dependable and indispensable tool for progress. In conclusion, Thinking Machines Lab’s bold foray into defeating nondeterminism in LLM inference represents a pivotal moment in AI development. By striving for greater AI consistency, Mira Murati and her team are addressing a core limitation that has hindered broader AI adoption in critical sectors. Their focus on the intricate details of GPU kernel orchestration demonstrates a profound commitment to foundational research, promising a future where AI models are not just powerful but also reliably predictable. This endeavor has the potential to unlock new levels of trust and utility for artificial intelligence, making it a truly revolutionary force across all industries, including the dynamic world of digital assets and blockchain technology. To learn more about the latest AI models trends, explore our article on key developments shaping AI features. This post Unlocking Predictability: Thinking Machines Lab’s Revolutionary Push for AI Consistency first appeared on BitcoinWorld and is written by Editorial Team

Unlocking Predictability: Thinking Machines Lab’s Revolutionary Push for AI Consistency

BitcoinWorld

Unlocking Predictability: Thinking Machines Lab’s Revolutionary Push for AI Consistency

In the fast-paced world of technology, where even the slightest unpredictability can have significant financial implications, the quest for reliable artificial intelligence has become paramount. For those invested in cryptocurrencies and other high-stakes digital assets, the stability and accuracy of underlying AI systems, from market analysis tools to decentralized application components, are not just desirable but essential. Imagine an AI predicting market trends or executing trades; its consistency is as crucial as the security of the blockchain itself. This is precisely the frontier that Mira Murati’s highly anticipated Thinking Machines Lab is set to revolutionize.

The Critical Need for Consistent AI Models

For too long, the AI community has largely accepted a fundamental challenge: the inherent nondeterminism of large language models (LLMs). If you’ve ever asked ChatGPT the same question multiple times, you’ve likely received a spectrum of answers, each slightly different. While this variability can sometimes mimic human creativity, it poses a significant hurdle for applications requiring absolute precision and reliability. Consider enterprise solutions, scientific research, or even advanced financial modeling – consistent outputs are not a luxury; they are a necessity. This is where the work of Thinking Machines Lab steps in, challenging the status quo and aiming to engineer a new era of predictable and trustworthy AI models.

The problem of nondeterminism manifests in several ways:

  • Lack of Reproducibility: Researchers struggle to replicate experimental results, slowing down scientific progress.
  • Enterprise Adoption Challenges: Businesses hesitate to deploy AI in critical functions if they cannot guarantee consistent outcomes.
  • Debugging Difficulties: Diagnosing errors in AI systems becomes exponentially harder when outputs vary randomly.

Mira Murati, formerly OpenAI’s chief technology officer, has assembled an all-star team of researchers, backed by an astounding $2 billion in seed funding. Their mission, as unveiled in their first research blog post titled “Defeating Nondeterminism in LLM Inference” on their new platform “Connectionism,” is clear: to tackle this foundational problem head-on. They believe that the randomness isn’t an unchangeable fact of AI, but a solvable engineering challenge.

Decoding Nondeterminism in LLM Inference

The groundbreaking research from Thinking Machines Lab, specifically detailed by researcher Horace He, delves into the technical underpinnings of this nondeterminism. He argues that the root cause lies not in the high-level algorithms but in the intricate orchestration of GPU kernels. These small programs, which run inside powerful Nvidia computer chips, are the workhorses of AI inference – the process that generates responses after you input a query into an LLM.

During LLM inference, billions of calculations are performed simultaneously across numerous GPU cores. The way these kernels are scheduled, executed, and their results aggregated can introduce tiny, almost imperceptible variations. These variations, when compounded across the vast number of operations in a large model, lead to the noticeable differences in outputs we observe. Horace He’s hypothesis is that by gaining meticulous control over this low-level orchestration layer, it is possible to eliminate or significantly reduce this randomness. This isn’t just about tweaking a few parameters; it’s about fundamentally rethinking how AI computations are managed at the hardware-software interface.

This approach highlights a shift in focus:

  • From Algorithms to Orchestration: Moving beyond model architecture to the underlying computational execution.
  • Hardware-Aware AI: Recognizing the profound impact of hardware-software interaction on model behavior.
  • Precision Engineering: Applying rigorous engineering principles to AI inference processes.

This level of control could unlock unprecedented reliability, making AI systems behave more like traditional deterministic software, where the same input always yields the same output.

Why AI Consistency is a Game-Changer for Innovation

The implications of achieving true AI consistency are vast and transformative, extending far beyond simply getting the same answer twice from ChatGPT. For enterprises, it means building trust in AI-powered applications, from customer service chatbots that always provide uniform information to automated financial analysis tools that generate identical reports given the same data. Imagine the confidence businesses would have in deploying AI for critical decision-making processes if they could guarantee reproducible outcomes.

In the scientific community, the ability to generate reproducible AI responses is nothing short of revolutionary. Scientific progress relies heavily on the ability to replicate experiments and verify results. If AI models are used for data analysis, simulation, or hypothesis generation, their outputs must be consistent for findings to be considered credible and build upon. Horace He further notes that this consistency could dramatically improve reinforcement learning (RL) training. RL is a powerful method where AI models learn by receiving rewards for correct actions. However, if the AI’s responses are constantly shifting, the reward signals become noisy, making the learning process inefficient and prolonged. Smoother, more consistent responses would lead to:

  • Faster Training: Clearer reward signals accelerate the learning curve.
  • More Robust Models: Training on consistent data leads to more stable and reliable AI.
  • Reduced Data Noise: Eliminating variability in responses cleans up the training data, improving overall model quality.

The Information previously reported that Thinking Machines Lab plans to leverage RL to customize AI models for businesses. This suggests a direct link between their current research into consistency and their future product offerings, aiming to deliver highly reliable, tailor-made AI solutions for various industries. Such developments could profoundly impact sectors ranging from healthcare and manufacturing to finance and logistics, where precision and reliability are paramount.

Thinking Machines Lab: A New Era of Reproducible AI

The launch of their research blog, “Connectionism,” signals Thinking Machines Lab‘s commitment to transparency and open research, a refreshing stance in an increasingly secretive AI landscape. This inaugural post, part of an effort to “benefit the public, but also improve our own research culture,” echoes the early ideals of organizations like OpenAI. However, as OpenAI grew, its commitment to open research seemingly diminished. The tech world will be watching closely to see if Murati’s lab can maintain this ethos while navigating the pressures of a $12 billion valuation and the competitive AI market.

Murati herself indicated in July that the lab’s first product would be unveiled in the coming months, designed to be “useful for researchers and startups developing custom models.” While it remains speculative whether this initial product will directly incorporate the techniques from their nondeterminism research, the focus on foundational problems suggests a long-term vision. By tackling core issues like reproducibility, Thinking Machines Lab is not just building new applications; it’s laying the groundwork for a more stable and trustworthy AI ecosystem.

The journey to create truly reproducible AI is ambitious, but if successful, it could solidify Thinking Machines Lab’s position as a leader at the frontier of AI research, setting new standards for reliability and paving the way for a new generation of dependable intelligent systems.

The Road Ahead: Challenges and Opportunities for Thinking Machines Lab

The venture of Thinking Machines Lab is not without its challenges. Operating with a $12 billion valuation brings immense pressure to deliver not just groundbreaking research but also commercially viable products. The technical hurdles in precisely controlling GPU kernel orchestration are formidable, requiring deep expertise in both hardware and software. Furthermore, the broader AI community’s long-standing acceptance of nondeterminism means that TML is effectively challenging a deeply ingrained paradigm. Success will require not only solving the technical problem but also demonstrating its practical benefits convincingly to a global audience.

However, the opportunities are equally immense. By solving the problem of AI consistency, Thinking Machines Lab could become the standard-bearer for reliable AI, attracting partners and customers across every industry. Their commitment to sharing research publicly, through platforms like Connectionism, could foster a collaborative environment, accelerating innovation across the entire AI ecosystem. If they can successfully integrate their research into products that make AI models more predictable, they will not only justify their valuation but also fundamentally alter how businesses and scientists interact with artificial intelligence, making it a more dependable and indispensable tool for progress.

In conclusion, Thinking Machines Lab’s bold foray into defeating nondeterminism in LLM inference represents a pivotal moment in AI development. By striving for greater AI consistency, Mira Murati and her team are addressing a core limitation that has hindered broader AI adoption in critical sectors. Their focus on the intricate details of GPU kernel orchestration demonstrates a profound commitment to foundational research, promising a future where AI models are not just powerful but also reliably predictable. This endeavor has the potential to unlock new levels of trust and utility for artificial intelligence, making it a truly revolutionary force across all industries, including the dynamic world of digital assets and blockchain technology.

To learn more about the latest AI models trends, explore our article on key developments shaping AI features.

This post Unlocking Predictability: Thinking Machines Lab’s Revolutionary Push for AI Consistency first appeared on BitcoinWorld and is written by Editorial Team

Market Opportunity
Threshold Logo
Threshold Price(T)
$0.009335
$0.009335$0.009335
-0.44%
USD
Threshold (T) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Microsoft Corp. $MSFT blue box area offers a buying opportunity

Microsoft Corp. $MSFT blue box area offers a buying opportunity

The post Microsoft Corp. $MSFT blue box area offers a buying opportunity appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In today’s article, we’ll examine the recent performance of Microsoft Corp. ($MSFT) through the lens of Elliott Wave Theory. We’ll review how the rally from the April 07, 2025 low unfolded as a 5-wave impulse followed by a 3-swing correction (ABC) and discuss our forecast for the next move. Let’s dive into the structure and expectations for this stock. Five wave impulse structure + ABC + WXY correction $MSFT 8H Elliott Wave chart 9.04.2025 In the 8-hour Elliott Wave count from Sep 04, 2025, we saw that $MSFT completed a 5-wave impulsive cycle at red III. As expected, this initial wave prompted a pullback. We anticipated this pullback to unfold in 3 swings and find buyers in the equal legs area between $497.02 and $471.06 This setup aligns with a typical Elliott Wave correction pattern (ABC), in which the market pauses briefly before resuming its primary trend. $MSFT 8H Elliott Wave chart 7.14.2025 The update, 10 days later, shows the stock finding support from the equal legs area as predicted allowing traders to get risk free. The stock is expected to bounce towards 525 – 532 before deciding if the bounce is a connector or the next leg higher. A break into new ATHs will confirm the latter and can see it trade higher towards 570 – 593 area. Until then, traders should get risk free and protect their capital in case of a WXY double correction. Conclusion In conclusion, our Elliott Wave analysis of Microsoft Corp. ($MSFT) suggested that it remains supported against April 07, 2025 lows and bounce from the blue box area. In the meantime, keep an eye out for any corrective pullbacks that may offer entry opportunities. By applying Elliott Wave Theory, traders can better anticipate the structure of upcoming moves and enhance risk management in volatile markets. Source: https://www.fxstreet.com/news/microsoft-corp-msft-blue-box-area-offers-a-buying-opportunity-202509171323
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:50
WTI drifts higher above $59.50 on Kazakh supply disruptions

WTI drifts higher above $59.50 on Kazakh supply disruptions

The post WTI drifts higher above $59.50 on Kazakh supply disruptions appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. West Texas Intermediate (WTI), the US crude oil benchmark
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/21 11:24
Fed forecasts only one rate cut in 2026, a more conservative outlook than expected

Fed forecasts only one rate cut in 2026, a more conservative outlook than expected

The post Fed forecasts only one rate cut in 2026, a more conservative outlook than expected appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell talks to reporters following the regular Federal Open Market Committee meetings at the Fed on July 30, 2025 in Washington, DC. Chip Somodevilla | Getty Images The Federal Reserve is projecting only one rate cut in 2026, fewer than expected, according to its median projection. The central bank’s so-called dot plot, which shows 19 individual members’ expectations anonymously, indicated a median estimate of 3.4% for the federal funds rate at the end of 2026. That compares to a median estimate of 3.6% for the end of this year following two expected cuts on top of Wednesday’s reduction. A single quarter-point reduction next year is significantly more conservative than current market pricing. Traders are currently pricing in at two to three more rate cuts next year, according to the CME Group’s FedWatch tool, updated shortly after the decision. The gauge uses prices on 30-day fed funds futures contracts to determine market-implied odds for rate moves. Here are the Fed’s latest targets from 19 FOMC members, both voters and nonvoters: Zoom In IconArrows pointing outwards The forecasts, however, showed a large difference of opinion with two voting members seeing as many as four cuts. Three officials penciled in three rate reductions next year. “Next year’s dot plot is a mosaic of different perspectives and is an accurate reflection of a confusing economic outlook, muddied by labor supply shifts, data measurement concerns, and government policy upheaval and uncertainty,” said Seema Shah, chief global strategist at Principal Asset Management. The central bank has two policy meetings left for the year, one in October and one in December. Economic projections from the Fed saw slightly faster economic growth in 2026 than was projected in June, while the outlook for inflation was updated modestly higher for next year. There’s a lot of uncertainty…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:59