The post Details Might Spare The L.A. Clippers In Kawhi Leonard Circumvention Saga appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA – JULY 24: Los Angeles Clippers owner Steve Ballmer hands Kawhi Leonard his jersey as he and Paul George are introduced at Green Meadows Recreation Center on July 24, 2019 in Los Angeles, California. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by Kevork Djansezian/Getty Images) Getty Images The Los Angeles Clippers found themselves in hot water Wednesday when investigative journalist Pablo Torre dropped a bombshell of a report accusing them of potential salary-cap circumvention with star forward Kawhi Leonard. Torre detailed how Clippers governor Steve Ballmer invested $50 million into Aspiration, a now-bankrupt environmental company, only for Aspiration to turn around and give Leonard a $28 million “no-show” endorsement deal through an LLC that he managed. “We went through a litany of really, really top-tier name contracts. And then, ‘Oh, by the way, we also have a marketing deal with Kawhi Leonard, like a $28 million organic marketing sponsorship deal with Kawhi,'” a former employee from Aspiration’s finance department told Torre. “And if I had any questions about it, essentially don’t, because it was to ‘circumvent the salary cap. LOL.’ There was lots of LOL when things were shared.” NBA spokesman Mike Bass told ESPN Wednesday that the league was “aware of this morning’s media report regarding the LA Clippers and [is] commencing an investigation.” The Clippers also issued a statement denying that they or Ballmer circumvented the salary cap by funneling extra money to Leonard through this sponsorship deal. If the NBA determines Torre’s reporting is accurate, it could spell major trouble for the Clippers. However, the devil may be in the details regarding the exact type of punishment that they might… The post Details Might Spare The L.A. Clippers In Kawhi Leonard Circumvention Saga appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA – JULY 24: Los Angeles Clippers owner Steve Ballmer hands Kawhi Leonard his jersey as he and Paul George are introduced at Green Meadows Recreation Center on July 24, 2019 in Los Angeles, California. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by Kevork Djansezian/Getty Images) Getty Images The Los Angeles Clippers found themselves in hot water Wednesday when investigative journalist Pablo Torre dropped a bombshell of a report accusing them of potential salary-cap circumvention with star forward Kawhi Leonard. Torre detailed how Clippers governor Steve Ballmer invested $50 million into Aspiration, a now-bankrupt environmental company, only for Aspiration to turn around and give Leonard a $28 million “no-show” endorsement deal through an LLC that he managed. “We went through a litany of really, really top-tier name contracts. And then, ‘Oh, by the way, we also have a marketing deal with Kawhi Leonard, like a $28 million organic marketing sponsorship deal with Kawhi,'” a former employee from Aspiration’s finance department told Torre. “And if I had any questions about it, essentially don’t, because it was to ‘circumvent the salary cap. LOL.’ There was lots of LOL when things were shared.” NBA spokesman Mike Bass told ESPN Wednesday that the league was “aware of this morning’s media report regarding the LA Clippers and [is] commencing an investigation.” The Clippers also issued a statement denying that they or Ballmer circumvented the salary cap by funneling extra money to Leonard through this sponsorship deal. If the NBA determines Torre’s reporting is accurate, it could spell major trouble for the Clippers. However, the devil may be in the details regarding the exact type of punishment that they might…

Details Might Spare The L.A. Clippers In Kawhi Leonard Circumvention Saga

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA – JULY 24: Los Angeles Clippers owner Steve Ballmer hands Kawhi Leonard his jersey as he and Paul George are introduced at Green Meadows Recreation Center on July 24, 2019 in Los Angeles, California. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by Kevork Djansezian/Getty Images)

Getty Images

The Los Angeles Clippers found themselves in hot water Wednesday when investigative journalist Pablo Torre dropped a bombshell of a report accusing them of potential salary-cap circumvention with star forward Kawhi Leonard.

Torre detailed how Clippers governor Steve Ballmer invested $50 million into Aspiration, a now-bankrupt environmental company, only for Aspiration to turn around and give Leonard a $28 million “no-show” endorsement deal through an LLC that he managed.

“We went through a litany of really, really top-tier name contracts. And then, ‘Oh, by the way, we also have a marketing deal with Kawhi Leonard, like a $28 million organic marketing sponsorship deal with Kawhi,'” a former employee from Aspiration’s finance department told Torre. “And if I had any questions about it, essentially don’t, because it was to ‘circumvent the salary cap. LOL.’ There was lots of LOL when things were shared.”

NBA spokesman Mike Bass told ESPN Wednesday that the league was “aware of this morning’s media report regarding the LA Clippers and [is]

commencing an investigation.” The Clippers also issued a statement denying that they or Ballmer circumvented the salary cap by funneling extra money to Leonard through this sponsorship deal.

If the NBA determines Torre’s reporting is accurate, it could spell major trouble for the Clippers. However, the devil may be in the details regarding the exact type of punishment that they might face.

NBA’s Penalties For Salary-Cap Circumvention

The NBA’s collective bargaining agreement is crystal-clear when it comes to salary-cap circumvention. In essence, teams are not allowed to pay players with additional side agreements beyond what’s contained in their contract.

The CBA spells out two specific types of circumvention, which could be what saves the Clippers. (Relatively speaking, anyway.)

The first type is when a team enters “into an agreement or understanding with any sponsor or business partner or third party under which such sponsor, business partner, or third party pays or agrees to pay compensation for basketball services.” While Aspiration wasn’t directly paying Leonard to play basketball, Torre revealed that the endorsement deal could have been terminated if Leonard was no longer with the Clippers.

The other type of circumvention prohibits any team or “team affiliate” from reaching an agreement “involving compensation or consideration of any kind or anything else of value.” The CBA defines a team affiliate as “any individual or entity who or which holds an ownership interest in a team” or any entity which a team owner “holds (directly or indirectly) more than 5% of its ownership interests, or participates in or influences its management or operations.”

If a team is found guilty of the first type of circumvention, it could face a fine up to $4.5 million, forfeit one first-round pick and have the player’s contract voided. If it’s found guilty of the second type of circumvention, the NBA commissioner can issue a fine up to $7.5 million, void the player’s contract and “direct the forfeiture of draft picks” (plural, with no specific number mentioned).

That begs the question: If the Clippers did commit circumvention with Leonard, which version would the NBA hold them accountable for?

Was Aspiration A ‘Team Affiliate’?

As part of its investigation into these allegations, the NBA will need to determine the extent of Ballmer’s involvement in Aspiration.

Torre sorted through publicly available bankruptcy filings and found that Ballmer made a $50 million investment in Aspiration via his personal LLC in September 2021. Two weeks later, the Clippers announced a $300 million sponsorship deal with the company. In November of that year, Leonard registered his own LLC, KL2 Aspire, and his endorsement deal went into effect in April 2022.

If the NBA determines that Aspiration was a team affiliate given Ballmer’s personal investment in the company and the sponsorship deal they later inked with the Clippers, that would open the door to more severe punishments for circumvention.

In perhaps the most infamous circumvention case, then-NBA Commissioner David Stern stripped the Minnesota Timberwolves of five future-first round picks for an under-the-table agreement with Joe Smith about a future contract. He also voided Smith’s series of one-year contracts with the Timberwolves, which caused them to lose his Bird rights. Smith wound up signing with the Detroit Pistons instead, leaving the T-Wolves empty-handed.

The Clippers already owe their fully unprotected 2026 and 2028 first-round picks to the Oklahoma City Thunder and Philadelphia 76ers, respectively, so the NBA likely would leave those alone when doling out its punishment. The Thunder also have the right to swap 2027 first-round picks with the Clippers, as do the Sixers in 2029 so long as the Clippers’ pick doesn’t land within the top three selections. However, the Clippers have full control over their first-round picks from 2030 onward.

The Clippers had already been structuring their contracts to end simultaneously after the 2026-27 season at the latest, leaving them with a largely blank slate in 2027. But if the league office voids Leonard’s contract, that could create a chain reaction that accelerates their fresh start. James Harden has a $42.3 million player option for the 2026-27 season which he might be less inclined to pick up if he no longer has a co-star running mate.

Given the severity of these allegations, one Western Conference general manager predicted to Chris Mannix of Sports Illustrated that the NBA’s punishment will be “worse than what happened in Minnesota with Joe Smith” if its investigation confirms Torre’s reporting. Mannix added that “NBA officials are furious about these allegations.”

Torre’s reporting has set the stage for a blockbuster showdown between Silver and Ballmer. Other front offices and team governors will be closely watching how this plays out, as it could set a precedent either way moving forward.

If the NBA concludes the Clippers did circumvent the cap but strips them of only one first-round pick, that might not be enough to dissuade other teams from following suit. But if the league strips the Clippers of multiple first-rounders and/or voids Leonard’s contract, that would send a strong message to the rest of the league.

Whether Aspiration counts as a “team affiliate” may determine the scope of the pain that the NBA can inflict upon Ballmer and the Clippers if their investigation confirms Torre’s bombshell report.

Unless otherwise noted, all stats via NBA.com, PBPStats, Cleaning the Glass or Basketball Reference. All salary information via Spotrac and salary-cap information via RealGM. All odds via FanDuel Sportsbook.

Follow Bryan on Bluesky.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/bryantoporek/2025/09/04/details-might-spare-the-la-clippers-in-kawhi-leonard-circumvention-saga/

Market Opportunity
Threshold Logo
Threshold Price(T)
$0.006245
$0.006245$0.006245
-2.61%
USD
Threshold (T) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Is Doge Losing Steam As Traders Choose Pepeto For The Best Crypto Investment?

Is Doge Losing Steam As Traders Choose Pepeto For The Best Crypto Investment?

The post Is Doge Losing Steam As Traders Choose Pepeto For The Best Crypto Investment? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto News 17 September 2025 | 17:39 Is dogecoin really fading? As traders hunt the best crypto to buy now and weigh 2025 picks, Dogecoin (DOGE) still owns the meme coin spotlight, yet upside looks capped, today’s Dogecoin price prediction says as much. Attention is shifting to projects that blend culture with real on-chain tools. Buyers searching “best crypto to buy now” want shipped products, audits, and transparent tokenomics. That frames the true matchup: dogecoin vs. Pepeto. Enter Pepeto (PEPETO), an Ethereum-based memecoin with working rails: PepetoSwap, a zero-fee DEX, plus Pepeto Bridge for smooth cross-chain moves. By fusing story with tools people can use now, and speaking directly to crypto presale 2025 demand, Pepeto puts utility, clarity, and distribution in front. In a market where legacy meme coin leaders risk drifting on sentiment, Pepeto’s execution gives it a real seat in the “best crypto to buy now” debate. First, a quick look at why dogecoin may be losing altitude. Dogecoin Price Prediction: Is Doge Really Fading? Remember when dogecoin made crypto feel simple? In 2013, DOGE turned a meme into money and a loose forum into a movement. A decade on, the nonstop momentum has cooled; the backdrop is different, and the market is far more selective. With DOGE circling ~$0.268, the tape reads bearish-to-neutral for the next few weeks: hold the $0.26 shelf on daily closes and expect choppy range-trading toward $0.29–$0.30 where rallies keep stalling; lose $0.26 decisively and momentum often bleeds into $0.245 with risk of a deeper probe toward $0.22–$0.21; reclaim $0.30 on a clean daily close and the downside bias is likely neutralized, opening room for a squeeze into the low-$0.30s. Source: CoinMarketcap / TradingView Beyond the dogecoin price prediction, DOGE still centers on payments and lacks native smart contracts; ZK-proof verification is proposed,…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:14
Cardano Latest News, Pi Network Price Prediction and The Best Meme Coin To Buy In 2025

Cardano Latest News, Pi Network Price Prediction and The Best Meme Coin To Buy In 2025

The post Cardano Latest News, Pi Network Price Prediction and The Best Meme Coin To Buy In 2025 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Pi Network is rearing its head, and Cardano is trying to recover from a downtrend. But the go to option this fall is Layer Brett, a meme coin with utility baked into it. $LBRETT’s presale is not only attractive, but is magnetic due to high rewards and the chance to make over 100x gains. Layer Brett Is Loading: Join or You’re Wrecked The crypto crowd loves to talk big numbers, but here’s one that’s impossible to ignore: Layer 2 markets are projected to process more than $10 trillion per year by 2027. That tidal wave is building right now — and Layer Brett is already carving out space to ride it. The presale price? A tiny $0.0058. That’s launchpad level, the kind of entry point that fuels 100x gains if momentum kicks in. Latecomers will scroll through charts in regret while early entrants pocket the spoils. Layer Brett is more than another Layer 2 solution. It’s crypto tech wrapped in meme energy, and that mix is lethal in the best way. Blazing-fast transactions, negligible fees, and staking rewards that could make traditional finance blush. Stakers lock in a staggering 700% APY. But every new wallet that joins cuts into that yield, so hesitation is expensive. And let’s not forget the kicker — a massive $1 million giveaway fueling even more hype around the presale. Combine that with a decentralized design, and you’ve got something that stands out in a space overcrowded with promises. This isn’t some slow-burning project hoping to survive. Layer Brett is engineered to explode. It’s raw, it’s loud, it’s built for the degens who understand that timing is everything. At $0.0058, you’re either in early — or you’re out forever. Is PI the People’s Currency? Pi Network’s open mainnet unlocks massive potential, with millions of users completing…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 06:14
How The ByteDance App Survived Trump And A US Ban

How The ByteDance App Survived Trump And A US Ban

The post How The ByteDance App Survived Trump And A US Ban appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. WASHINGTON, DC – MARCH 13: Participants hold signs in support of TikTok outside the U.S. Capitol Building on March 13, 2024 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images) Getty Images From President Trump’s first ban attempt to a near-blackout earlier this year, TikTok’s five-year roller coaster ride looks like it’s finally slowing down now that Trump has unveiled a deal framework to keep the ByteDance app alive in the U.S. A look back at the saga around TikTok starting in 2020, however, shows just how close the app came to being shut out of the US – how it narrowly averted a ban and forced sale that found rare bipartisan backing in Washington. Recapping TikTok’s dramatic five-year battle When I interviewed Brendan Carr back in 2022, for example, the future FCC chairman was already certain at that point that TikTok’s days were numbered. For a litany of perceived sins — everything from the too-cozy relationship of the app’s parent company with China’s ruling regime to the app’s repeated floating of user privacy — Carr was already convinced, at least during his conversation with me, that: “The tide is going out on TikTok.” It was, in fact, one of the few issues that Washington lawmakers seemed to agree on. Even then-President Biden was on board, having resurrected Trump’s aborted TikTok ban from his first term and signed it into law. “It feels different now than it did two years ago at the end of the Trump administration, when concerns were first raised,” Carr told me then, in August of 2022. “I think, like a lot of things in the Trump era, people sort of picked sides on the issue based on the fact that it was Trump.” One thing led to another, though, and it looked like Carr was probably…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 07:29