The crypto industry rarely forgets its defining battles. Few conflicts shaped market sentiment and regulatory debate more than the U.S. government’s case againstThe crypto industry rarely forgets its defining battles. Few conflicts shaped market sentiment and regulatory debate more than the U.S. government’s case against

Man Who Spent 4 Years Trying to Destroy XRP Makes a U-Turn Statement

2026/02/28 23:05
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

The crypto industry rarely forgets its defining battles. Few conflicts shaped market sentiment and regulatory debate more than the U.S. government’s case against Ripple. For years, XRP operated under a cloud of uncertainty as regulators challenged its legal status and exchanges distanced themselves from the token.

Now, in a surprising twist, a senior official who witnessed that entire chapter has reportedly delivered an unexpected acknowledgment.

CryptoSensei revealed on X that Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse shared a remarkable encounter during a recent White House digital asset briefing. Garlinghouse told an audience in Sydney that a senior U.S. official privately approached him and said, “Sorry… I was wrong, and you guys have done an incredible job.”

Garlinghouse described the moment as a genuine surprise. He did not disclose the official’s identity, but he confirmed that the individual held a sufficiently senior role to attend the White House session.

The backdrop to this moment carries significant weight. In December 2020, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filed a lawsuit against Ripple, alleging that XRP constituted an unregistered security. The action triggered widespread exchange delistings and wiped out billions in market value.

In July 2023, U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres ruled that XRP itself does not qualify as a security when sold on secondary markets. The court distinguished between institutional sales and programmatic sales, narrowing the SEC’s broader argument.

After extended proceedings, Ripple agreed to pay a $125 million civil penalty tied to certain institutional transactions. By 2025, both Ripple and the SEC withdrew their appeals, officially closing the case and ending one of crypto’s most consequential legal disputes.

A White House Setting Signals Policy Evolution

The reported apology occurred at a White House digital asset briefing, which adds symbolic significance. Officials attending such briefings typically shape or influence federal crypto policy. Although Garlinghouse declined to name the individual, the private remark suggests that perspectives inside Washington may have shifted since the lawsuit’s early days.

Online speculation quickly followed, with some observers naming former regulators. However, no confirmed identity has emerged. Without official disclosure, the statement remains a personal exchange rather than a formal policy announcement.

What This Moment Represents for XRP

Garlinghouse’s story reflects more than a single apology. The Ripple case forced courts, regulators, and lawmakers to clarify how existing securities laws apply to digital assets. The outcome strengthened legal certainty for XRP and influenced broader regulatory conversations.

The reported acknowledgment suggests that some policymakers may now recognize Ripple’s operational resilience and XRP’s utility-driven model. While the identity behind the apology remains unconfirmed, the broader message is clear: the regulatory narrative surrounding XRP has evolved.

After four years of confrontation, the conversation has shifted from accusation to recognition. For many in the crypto space, that shift marks a meaningful turning point.

Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are urged to do in-depth research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.


Follow us on Twitter, Facebook, Telegram, and Google News

The post Man Who Spent 4 Years Trying to Destroy XRP Makes a U-Turn Statement appeared first on Times Tabloid.

Market Opportunity
Union Logo
Union Price(U)
$0.000995
$0.000995$0.000995
+4.73%
USD
Union (U) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
South Korea Orders Crypto Custody Overhaul After Police Lose Seized BTC

South Korea Orders Crypto Custody Overhaul After Police Lose Seized BTC

TLDR South Korea introduced new custody rules after police lost seized Bitcoin worth $1.4 million. The Finance Minister confirmed a full inspection of digital asset
Share
Coincentral2026/03/03 01:00
Trump Justice Department’s motion to take Michigan voter rolls misspelled 'United States'

Trump Justice Department’s motion to take Michigan voter rolls misspelled 'United States'

The Justice Department filed an emergency motion at the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals on Monday against the state of Michigan over its refusal to share voter rolls
Share
Alternet2026/03/03 01:25