The post SWIFT CIO Takes Dig at Ripple: ‘Surviving Lawsuits Isn’t Resilience’ appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Tom Zschach, chief innovation officer at SWIFT, took a swipe at Ripple in a recent social media post.  Zschach has opined that surviving lawsuits does not actually qualify as resilience while touting neutral governance.  “Surviving lawsuits isn’t resilience. Neutral, shared governance is. Institutions don’t want to live on a competitor’s rails,” he said.  What neutral governance means Neutral governance implies that no single company or competitor actually controls the rails. SWIFT, as a global messaging company, is not controlled by a single company. It is jointly controlled by thousands of banks that are in charge of setting the rules and governance standards.  You Might Also Like Zschach implies that banks tend to trust only neutral infrastructure like SWIFT.  Even though Ripple argues that the XRP Ledger is fully decentralized, there have been some concerns about the company’s outsized control over the network. Compliance is more than working with regulators  Moreover, Zschach insists that compliance is more than getting along with regulators and convincing them that you should be allowed to operate. The SWIFT executive argues that compliance is actually about ensuring that an entire industry is actually capable of agreeing on shared standards.  Absorbing the best of public chains  In his lengthy LinkedIn post, Zschach, who is also former managing director at Barclays Capital, argues that public chains themselves are not the solution.  He claims that a pubic chain is just “a fast engine with no cockpit” if there is no enforceability, privacy, and compliance.  Zschach is convinced that traditional finance will be able to “absorb” the best of public blockchains on its own terms.  Source: https://u.today/swift-cio-takes-dig-at-ripple-surviving-lawsuits-isnt-resilienceThe post SWIFT CIO Takes Dig at Ripple: ‘Surviving Lawsuits Isn’t Resilience’ appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Tom Zschach, chief innovation officer at SWIFT, took a swipe at Ripple in a recent social media post.  Zschach has opined that surviving lawsuits does not actually qualify as resilience while touting neutral governance.  “Surviving lawsuits isn’t resilience. Neutral, shared governance is. Institutions don’t want to live on a competitor’s rails,” he said.  What neutral governance means Neutral governance implies that no single company or competitor actually controls the rails. SWIFT, as a global messaging company, is not controlled by a single company. It is jointly controlled by thousands of banks that are in charge of setting the rules and governance standards.  You Might Also Like Zschach implies that banks tend to trust only neutral infrastructure like SWIFT.  Even though Ripple argues that the XRP Ledger is fully decentralized, there have been some concerns about the company’s outsized control over the network. Compliance is more than working with regulators  Moreover, Zschach insists that compliance is more than getting along with regulators and convincing them that you should be allowed to operate. The SWIFT executive argues that compliance is actually about ensuring that an entire industry is actually capable of agreeing on shared standards.  Absorbing the best of public chains  In his lengthy LinkedIn post, Zschach, who is also former managing director at Barclays Capital, argues that public chains themselves are not the solution.  He claims that a pubic chain is just “a fast engine with no cockpit” if there is no enforceability, privacy, and compliance.  Zschach is convinced that traditional finance will be able to “absorb” the best of public blockchains on its own terms.  Source: https://u.today/swift-cio-takes-dig-at-ripple-surviving-lawsuits-isnt-resilience

SWIFT CIO Takes Dig at Ripple: ‘Surviving Lawsuits Isn’t Resilience’

Tom Zschach, chief innovation officer at SWIFT, took a swipe at Ripple in a recent social media post. 

Zschach has opined that surviving lawsuits does not actually qualify as resilience while touting neutral governance. 

“Surviving lawsuits isn’t resilience. Neutral, shared governance is. Institutions don’t want to live on a competitor’s rails,” he said. 

What neutral governance means

Neutral governance implies that no single company or competitor actually controls the rails.

SWIFT, as a global messaging company, is not controlled by a single company. It is jointly controlled by thousands of banks that are in charge of setting the rules and governance standards. 

You Might Also Like

Zschach implies that banks tend to trust only neutral infrastructure like SWIFT. 

Even though Ripple argues that the XRP Ledger is fully decentralized, there have been some concerns about the company’s outsized control over the network.

Compliance is more than working with regulators 

Moreover, Zschach insists that compliance is more than getting along with regulators and convincing them that you should be allowed to operate.

The SWIFT executive argues that compliance is actually about ensuring that an entire industry is actually capable of agreeing on shared standards. 

Absorbing the best of public chains 

In his lengthy LinkedIn post, Zschach, who is also former managing director at Barclays Capital, argues that public chains themselves are not the solution. 

He claims that a pubic chain is just “a fast engine with no cockpit” if there is no enforceability, privacy, and compliance. 

Zschach is convinced that traditional finance will be able to “absorb” the best of public blockchains on its own terms. 

Source: https://u.today/swift-cio-takes-dig-at-ripple-surviving-lawsuits-isnt-resilience

Market Opportunity
Threshold Logo
Threshold Price(T)
$0.009898
$0.009898$0.009898
-0.22%
USD
Threshold (T) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

A Radical Neural Network Approach to Modeling Shock Dynamics

A Radical Neural Network Approach to Modeling Shock Dynamics

This paper introduces a non-diffusive neural network (NDNN) method for solving hyperbolic conservation laws, designed to overcome the shortcomings of standard Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) in modeling shock waves. The NDNN framework decomposes the solution domain into smooth subdomains separated by discontinuity lines, identified via Rankine-Hugoniot conditions. This approach enables accurate tracking of entropic shocks, shock generation, and wave interactions, while reducing the diffusive errors typical in PINNs. Numerical experiments validate the algorithm’s potential, highlighting its promise for extending shock-wave computations to higher-dimensional problems.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/19 18:38
A Netflix ‘KPop Demon Hunters’ Short Film Has Been Rated For Release

A Netflix ‘KPop Demon Hunters’ Short Film Has Been Rated For Release

The post A Netflix ‘KPop Demon Hunters’ Short Film Has Been Rated For Release appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. KPop Demon Hunters Netflix Everyone has wondered what may be the next step for KPop Demon Hunters as an IP, given its record-breaking success on Netflix. Now, the answer may be something exactly no one predicted. According to a new filing with the MPA, something called Debut: A KPop Demon Hunters Story has been rated PG by the ratings body. It’s listed alongside some other films, and this is obviously something that has not been publicly announced. A short film could be well, very short, a few minutes, and likely no more than ten. Even that might be pushing it. Using say, Pixar shorts as a reference, most are between 4 and 8 minutes. The original movie is an hour and 36 minutes. The “Debut” in the title indicates some sort of flashback, perhaps to when HUNTR/X first arrived on the scene before they blew up. Previously, director Maggie Kang has commented about how there were more backstory components that were supposed to be in the film that were cut, but hinted those could be explored in a sequel. But perhaps some may be put into a short here. I very much doubt those scenes were fully produced and simply cut, but perhaps they were finished up for this short film here. When would Debut: KPop Demon Hunters theoretically arrive? I’m not sure the other films on the list are much help. Dead of Winter is out in less than two weeks. Mother Mary does not have a release date. Ne Zha 2 came out earlier this year. I’ve only seen news stories saying The Perfect Gamble was supposed to come out in Q1 2025, but I’ve seen no evidence that it actually has. KPop Demon Hunters Netflix It could be sooner rather than later as Netflix looks to capitalize…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:23
Headwind Helps Best Wallet Token

Headwind Helps Best Wallet Token

The post Headwind Helps Best Wallet Token appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Google has announced the launch of a new open-source protocol called Agent Payments Protocol (AP2) in partnership with Coinbase, the Ethereum Foundation, and 60 other organizations. This allows AI agents to make payments on behalf of users using various methods such as real-time bank transfers, credit and debit cards, and, most importantly, stablecoins. Let’s explore in detail what this could mean for the broader cryptocurrency markets, and also highlight a presale crypto (Best Wallet Token) that could explode as a result of this development. Google’s Push for Stablecoins Agent Payments Protocol (AP2) uses digital contracts known as ‘Intent Mandates’ and ‘Verifiable Credentials’ to ensure that AI agents undertake only those payments authorized by the user. Mandates, by the way, are cryptographically signed, tamper-proof digital contracts that act as verifiable proof of a user’s instruction. For example, let’s say you instruct an AI agent to never spend more than $200 in a single transaction. This instruction is written into an Intent Mandate, which serves as a digital contract. Now, whenever the AI agent tries to make a payment, it must present this mandate as proof of authorization, which will then be verified via the AP2 protocol. Alongside this, Google has also launched the A2A x402 extension to accelerate support for the Web3 ecosystem. This production-ready solution enables agent-based crypto payments and will help reshape the growth of cryptocurrency integration within the AP2 protocol. Google’s inclusion of stablecoins in AP2 is a massive vote of confidence in dollar-pegged cryptocurrencies and a huge step toward making them a mainstream payment option. This widens stablecoin usage beyond trading and speculation, positioning them at the center of the consumption economy. The recent enactment of the GENIUS Act in the U.S. gives stablecoins more structure and legal support. Imagine paying for things like data crawls, per-task…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:27