TLDR Leverage in derivatives markets is driving Bitcoin’s price movements, not spot buys. Binance data reveals that perpetual futures volumes dominate Bitcoin’sTLDR Leverage in derivatives markets is driving Bitcoin’s price movements, not spot buys. Binance data reveals that perpetual futures volumes dominate Bitcoin’s

Binance Data Explains Why Bitcoin Prices Slide Despite Strong Spot Market Bids

2026/02/08 04:08
5 min read

TLDR

  • Leverage in derivatives markets is driving Bitcoin’s price movements, not spot buys.
  • Binance data reveals that perpetual futures volumes dominate Bitcoin’s price discovery.
  • Bitcoin’s scarcity doesn’t prevent price declines when derivatives and leverage lead.
  • Leveraged liquidations in Bitcoin futures are causing price drops despite growing spot bids.

The recent decline in Bitcoin prices, despite significant spot market buying activity, has sparked confusion. New Binance trading data sheds light on why Bitcoin’s value continues to slide. The analysis focuses on the impact of leveraged trading, which has become the dominant force in setting Bitcoin’s price, overshadowing the influence of spot buyers.

The Role of Leverage and Derivatives in Bitcoin’s Price Movement

Bitcoin has a fixed supply of 21 million coins, making it a scarce asset. However, the actual market for Bitcoin often trades more than 21 million coins in terms of exposure. This exposure is primarily driven by derivatives like perpetual futures, which allow traders to gain large positions with minimal capital. These markets can be much larger and more liquid than the spot market, where actual Bitcoin is traded.

According to data from Binance, the perpetual-to-spot volume ratio has been consistently high. On February 3, this ratio reached 7.87, with perpetual futures volume hitting $23.51 billion, compared to just $2.99 billion in spot trades.

Even as Bitcoin price dropped from $75,770 to $69,700, these derivatives markets drove much of the trading action. This scenario reveals a paradox where Bitcoin, despite its limited supply, behaves like an asset with effectively unlimited exposure in the market.

The key factor in these price fluctuations is the speed and flexibility of derivatives trading. Unlike the slower spot market, where Bitcoin physically changes hands, derivatives allow for quick changes in exposure without requiring an actual transfer of Bitcoin. Leveraged positions can be easily created or closed, causing significant price swings that impact both traders and long-term holders.

Spot Buyers vs. Leveraged Traders: Who Controls Bitcoin’s Price?

Spot buyers play a crucial role in the overall demand for Bitcoin. However, data shows that the spot market’s influence on Bitcoin prices is often weaker when compared to leveraged trading in the derivatives markets. For instance, on January 31, the futures market saw a massive increase in liquidity of $297.75 million at a time when the spot market’s liquidity delta was much smaller.

Even when spot bids increase, as seen in the February 5 data with a $36.66 million spot liquidity delta, the price of Bitcoin still slid. This suggests that the marginal trade—the one that sets the next price—was determined more by the futures market than by the spot market.

The growth in perpetual futures trading, where traders can go long or short and use leverage, has meant that the actual purchase of Bitcoin in the spot market is no longer the main factor driving price movements. Instead, it is the rapid rebalancing of leveraged positions, whether through liquidations or hedging, that dictates Bitcoin’s day-to-day price changes.

The Influence of Bitcoin ETFs on Market Movements

Bitcoin Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have also had an impact on the price dynamics, though not as directly as some might think. According to the data, while Bitcoin ETFs showed both inflows and outflows over the past few weeks, these movements did not always correlate directly with Bitcoin’s price. For example, on February 2, Bitcoin ETFs saw a positive flow of $561.8 million, but the price of Bitcoin still fell after this.

It’s important to understand that ETF flows are processed through authorized participants and do not always directly result in Bitcoin being bought or sold in the spot market. The process of creating and redeeming ETF shares is often done in cash, which doesn’t always translate into actual Bitcoin transactions.

Moreover, the SEC-approved in-kind creation and redemption of crypto ETFs does allow authorized participants to directly handle Bitcoin, but even then, ETF activity sits alongside the more dominant derivative markets when it comes to short-term price movements.

The Effect of Exchange Reserves on Bitcoin Liquidity

Another important factor in understanding Bitcoin’s price dynamics is the amount of Bitcoin held in exchange reserves. From January 15 to February 5, the amount of Bitcoin on exchanges increased by 29,048 BTC, or about 1.07%. While this might suggest a higher supply of Bitcoin ready to be sold, it is crucial to note that not all of this Bitcoin is immediately available for trading.

Exchange reserves serve as a proxy for the tradable float of Bitcoin. However, even if the available supply of Bitcoin rises, leveraged positions in derivatives can still dominate price movement. As Binance’s data shows, the growth in reserves does not necessarily lead to a price increase in the spot market.

This data reflects the complexity of Bitcoin’s market structure, where the concept of scarcity doesn’t guarantee price stability. The speed of derivatives trading and leveraged positions often outweigh the effects of spot market buying, leading to continued price declines despite seemingly strong demand.

The post Binance Data Explains Why Bitcoin Prices Slide Despite Strong Spot Market Bids appeared first on CoinCentral.

Market Opportunity
Notcoin Logo
Notcoin Price(NOT)
$0.0003987
$0.0003987$0.0003987
-2.32%
USD
Notcoin (NOT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 7, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — HitPaw, a leader in AI-powered visual enhancement solutions, announced Comfy, a global content creation platform, is
Share
AI Journal2026/02/08 09:15
Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

A Journalist gave a brutal review of the new Melania documentary, which has been criticized by those who say it won't make back the huge fees spent to make it,
Share
Rawstory2026/02/08 09:08
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00