The post Why can’t anyone identify the trigger for crypto sell‑off that knocked Bitcoin back to $60,000? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin dropped harderThe post Why can’t anyone identify the trigger for crypto sell‑off that knocked Bitcoin back to $60,000? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin dropped harder

Why can’t anyone identify the trigger for crypto sell‑off that knocked Bitcoin back to $60,000?

Bitcoin dropped harder than anyone expected, and no one actually knows what set it off. It lost 16% in a week, crashing to $70,008, and at one point touched $60,000. That’s a massive fall from the all-time high of $126,273 it hit in October.

Ether didn’t do much better. It fell 24% to $2,052, now 59% below its record. Friday gave both tokens a little bounce, but that didn’t save the week. This was one of the worst stretches for crypto in years.

The most frustrating part is how clueless everyone is. Even the most recognizable names in the space, like Anthony Pompliano, Michael Novogratz, and Anthony Scaramucci, had no real answer.

Pompliano said, “Bitcoin is crashing and investors are freaking out.” Novogratz simply said, “There was no smoking gun.” Scaramucci put it plainly: “If you ask five experts, you’ll get five explanations.”

Traders turn to other markets as bitcoin loses spotlight

Pompliano pointed to distractions, saying that traders are busy throwing cash into prediction markets, gold, silver, AI projects, and even meme stocks. He used to think bitcoin was where people came for upside. Now they’re all over the place.

“It used to be that bitcoin was the consensus view where asymmetry existed,” he said. “Now you have AI, prediction markets… many other areas where people can go and they can speculate.”

Another problem is Wall Street. Over the past year, banks have rolled out all kinds of ETFs and derivatives tied to crypto. These tools let people bet on the price of bitcoin without ever touching the real thing.

And that has hurt bitcoin’s status as a rare asset. Its supply is still limited to 21 million coins, but the financial industry has made it easier to gamble on price without actually buying any.

During Trump’s comeback to the White House, bitcoin soared like crazy. From Election Day to early October last year, it jumped around 80%. Cory Klippsten, the CEO of Swan Bitcoin, admitted, “I really didn’t think that we’d see a six at the beginning of the bitcoin price ever again.” But here we are. That confidence has vanished. Past crashes always had some event behind them.

In 2018, it was the ICO bubble. In 2022, it was the $40 billion collapse of TerraUSD and Luna, which wiped out companies and led to the disaster at FTX. This time? Nothing specific.

Interest rates, regulatory fight and Trump’s laws cloud the picture

Trump picked Kevin Warsh as the next chair of the Federal Reserve. Some think Warsh might be spooking the crypto crowd. He’s seen as someone who leans toward a stronger U.S. dollar policy and isn’t afraid of higher interest rates. That’s bad news for riskier assets. And the WSJ Dollar Index did climb 0.4% this week. Higher rates and a stronger dollar usually mean less demand for bitcoin.

But Warsh isn’t completely against bitcoin. He once called it a “policeman for policy.” He even said bitcoin’s price can tell governments when they’re screwing up or doing well. That complicates the theory.

Then there’s the law. Trump passed the GENIUS Act last year, which helped legalize stablecoins tied to real-world currencies. The next step was the Clarity Act, a bill to give crypto companies clear rules. But it hit a wall. A fight broke out between big banks and crypto exchanges. Now the whole thing is stuck, and without it, traditional firms are staying away. That missing regulation could’ve been the fuel the market needed. Instead, it’s just another dead end.

Investors lock in profits while others keep holding on

Some people like Novogratz think it’s just profit-taking.No mystery. Bitcoin and ether had big gains since Trump won, and some investors decided it was time to cash out. They didn’t wait around.

They dumped tokens and banked the money. There’s even a name for it. They call it crypto winter, and it happens when prices fall fast and confidence goes cold.

But this time, there hasn’t been a major collapse or fraud. That’s different from past crashes. Jasper De Maere, from Wintermute, said, “The infrastructure is stronger, stablecoin adoption continues to grow, and institutional interest hasn’t evaporated, it’s just sidelined.” He said the interest “can return quickly.”

Some of the biggest believers haven’t flinched. Michael Saylor, who leads Strategy, held a call with investors on Thursday. His firm took a $12 billion quarterly loss from the drop in bitcoin. But he wasn’t panicking. He told investors the plan is to stay patient. “Your time horizon needs to be, minimal, four years,” he said.

Source: https://www.cryptopolitan.com/no-trigger-for-bitcoin-crypto-crash/

Market Opportunity
ANyONe Protocol Logo
ANyONe Protocol Price(ANYONE)
$0.1591
$0.1591$0.1591
+1.59%
USD
ANyONe Protocol (ANYONE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 7, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — HitPaw, a leader in AI-powered visual enhancement solutions, announced Comfy, a global content creation platform, is
Share
AI Journal2026/02/08 09:15
Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

A Journalist gave a brutal review of the new Melania documentary, which has been criticized by those who say it won't make back the huge fees spent to make it,
Share
Rawstory2026/02/08 09:08
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00