Crypto venture capital faces mounting challenges, with fundraising commitments stuck at multi-year lows even as Bitcoin climbed substantially from post-2022 lowsCrypto venture capital faces mounting challenges, with fundraising commitments stuck at multi-year lows even as Bitcoin climbed substantially from post-2022 lows

Crypto VC Crisis Deepens in 2026: Is the Era of Blockchain Innovation Truly Over for Bitcoin, Ethereum, and XRP Investors?

2026/02/08 02:24
3 min read

Crypto venture capital faces mounting challenges, with fundraising commitments stuck at multi-year lows even as Bitcoin climbed substantially from post-2022 lows toward six-figure territory in recent cycles. Industry observer Miya, who oversees crypto hedge fund activities, recently connected with numerous venture investors from both traditional finance and specialized crypto backgrounds. Her conclusion: enthusiasm for launching new blockchain-focused funds has evaporated.

Despite Bitcoin’s impressive rally—peaking well above previous bears and trading around $68,000–$70,000 levels in early February 2026—capital inflows for crypto VC never materialized. This disconnect stands out sharply, as other high-growth sectors like artificial intelligence attracted massive risk-on allocations over the past few years while blockchain experienced net capital outflows.

Crypto VC Crisis Deepens in 2026: Is the Era of Blockchain Innovation Truly Over for Bitcoin, Ethereum, and XRP Investors?

Critics of the current model point to structural flaws. Attempts to revive interest through mechanisms such as governance tokens or ownership coins fall short, as promising founders hesitate to cede control to anonymous holders. Blockchain projects increasingly appear detached from practical demand, producing solutions few users adopt and often serving as vehicles for short-term liquidity events rather than sustainable value creation.

Recent developments underscore the severity. Prominent crypto VC firm Paradigm reportedly lost roughly half its team members over a short period, with departures spanning key roles. Other notable players, including Mechanism and Tangent, have quietly redirected resources entirely away from digital assets. This exodus during a supposed market upswing raises fundamental questions about the viability of the traditional crypto VC approach, heavily weighted toward altcoins and infrastructure layers.

Miya advocates for a fundamental rethink: abandon efforts to decentralize established industries unnecessarily. Instead, integrate token incentives—such as revenue-sharing or equity-like ownership—into proven web2 businesses that already demonstrate strong product-market fit and user adoption. For instance, rather than attempting to replace ride-sharing giants with fully on-chain alternatives, apply tokenized rewards or stakes to successful platforms like Uber, aligning incentives without rebuilding core operations from the ground up.

This perspective aligns with broader market trends. Technological momentum has clearly migrated toward AI, robotics, and related breakthroughs, drawing talent, capital, and attention away from pure blockchain plays. Investors seeking diversification increasingly explore real assets, institutional-grade opportunities, and emerging tech sectors less prone to speculative cycles.

Current market snapshots reflect volatility:

  • Bitcoin (BTC-USD) hovering near $68,500–$70,500 amid fluctuating sentiment.
  • Ethereum (ETH-USD) showing resilience with notable percentage gains in recent sessions.
  • XRP maintaining upward pressure despite sector headwinds.

While core cryptocurrencies retain speculative appeal, the venture side signals a maturing—or potentially contracting—phase. Long-term participants may need to adapt to hybrid models blending traditional success with targeted tokenomics, or pivot alongside capital flows into adjacent innovation frontiers.

For those building resilient portfolios beyond single-asset exposure, blending crypto holdings with diversified alternatives—ranging from real estate fractions to AI-driven ventures—offers a hedge against sector-specific downturns. Platforms enabling access to institutional real estate, art, or specialized ETFs continue gaining traction as investors prioritize stability and uncorrelated returns in uncertain times.

Market Opportunity
VinuChain Logo
VinuChain Price(VC)
$0.000774
$0.000774$0.000774
+50.29%
USD
VinuChain (VC) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 7, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — HitPaw, a leader in AI-powered visual enhancement solutions, announced Comfy, a global content creation platform, is
Share
AI Journal2026/02/08 09:15
Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

A Journalist gave a brutal review of the new Melania documentary, which has been criticized by those who say it won't make back the huge fees spent to make it,
Share
Rawstory2026/02/08 09:08
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00