The post Fidelity enters stablecoin market with launch of FIDD backed 1:1 to U.S. dollar appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Fidelity is launching a stablecoinThe post Fidelity enters stablecoin market with launch of FIDD backed 1:1 to U.S. dollar appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Fidelity is launching a stablecoin

Fidelity enters stablecoin market with launch of FIDD backed 1:1 to U.S. dollar

Fidelity is launching a stablecoin. The token, called FIDD, stands for Fidelity Digital Dollar and will be backed 1:1 with U.S. dollars and short-term treasuries. It’s being issued by Fidelity Digital Assets, National Association, which got conditional approval from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency in December.

The company says both retail and institutional investors will be able to use the token in the coming weeks. The reserves for the coin will be handled by Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC.

FIDD will be listed on the Fidelity Digital Assets, Fidelity Crypto, and Fidelity Crypto for Wealth Managers platforms. It will also be tradable on crypto exchanges and transferable to any Ethereum mainnet address.

Fidelity outlines core purpose of the digital dollar

Mike O’Reilly, president of Fidelity Digital Assets, said the company sees stablecoins as part of the future of finance. “Real-time settlement, 24/7, low-cost treasury management are all meaningful benefits that stablecoins can bring to both our retail and our institutional clients,” Mike told Bloomberg.

Stablecoins are designed to stay at a fixed price, usually pegged to the U.S. dollar, and are supported by reserves like cash and short-term government debt. Their use has expanded since July, after the Genius Act became law. It was the first federal rule specifically for stablecoin issuers.

The Genius Act paved the way for more companies to jump in. Fidelity is joining a long line of other asset managers and fintech startups entering the space. The company made it clear that FIDD is being built for both day-to-day transactions and larger institutional settlement needs.

The new token drops into a crowded market. Circle already has USDC, Tether runs USDT, and now Fidelity is offering FIDD. All of them are pegged to the dollar. The difference here is who’s backing them. Fidelity brings a long-established financial brand into a space usually led by crypto startups.

Standard Chartered sees big risk to banks from stablecoin growth

Geoff Kendrick, who leads digital assets research at Standard Chartered, said the rise of stablecoins could cost U.S. banks as much as $500 billion in deposits by the end of 2028. He linked this potential loss to more people shifting from regular bank accounts into digital coins like FIDD.

Kendrick’s team estimates that bank deposits will drop by around one-third of the stablecoin market size. Right now, that market has climbed to just over $300 billion, up roughly 40% in the last year. The data comes from DeFi Llama.

He said this trend is likely to grow even faster if the Clarity Act, a new regulatory bill for digital assets, makes it through Congress. The bill is currently in progress.

“US banks also face a threat as payment networks and other core banking activities shift to stablecoins,” Kendrick wrote in his report.

Kendrick also warned that crypto firms like Coinbase are offering rewards on stablecoin balances, something banks can’t match without cutting into profits. Coinbase currently offers 3.5% rewards on balances of USDC.

Coinbase and banks clash over stablecoin rewards

Brian Armstrong, CEO of Coinbase, criticized banks for trying to shut down the competition. Speaking in Davos, he said, “The bank lobbying groups and bank associations are out there trying to ban their competition. I have zero tolerance for that, I think it’s un-American, and it harms consumers.”

Standard Chartered’s research shows the conflict isn’t going away. Kendrick said the digital-asset market bill is expected to pass by the end of the first quarter. That would clear up the legal status of stablecoins, how rewards are handled, and what banks are allowed to do in response.

Kendrick used net interest margin (NIM) as a key metric to track deposit risk. NIM shows how much of a bank’s revenue depends on customer deposits. He found that smaller regional banks are most exposed.

He looked at 19 U.S. banks and brokerages. The four most vulnerable were Huntington Bancshares, M&T Bank, Truist Financial, and Citizens Financial Group. These banks rely more on lending, so losing deposits would hit them harder than it would for large investment banks.

Even with all this, banks have seen some recent gains. The KBW Regional Banking Index jumped nearly 6% in January. That beat the KBW Bank Index, which only rose by a little over 1%.

Kendrick said rate cuts could help banks in the short term by making deposits cheaper. The administration’s push to boost economic growth could also increase loan demand. But he made it clear that the bigger shift to digital money is coming.

“An individual bank’s actual exposure to a stablecoin-driven reduction in NIM income will depend largely on its own response to the threat,” Kendrick wrote.

He also pointed out that Tether and Circle, the two biggest stablecoin issuers today, only keep a tiny share of their reserves in actual banks. Tether holds 0.02%, and Circle holds 14.5% in deposits. “Very little re-depositing is happening,” he said.

Claim your free seat in an exclusive crypto trading community – limited to 1,000 members.

Source: https://www.cryptopolitan.com/fidelity-stablecoin-fidd-backed-by-us-dollar/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 7, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — HitPaw, a leader in AI-powered visual enhancement solutions, announced Comfy, a global content creation platform, is
Share
AI Journal2026/02/08 09:15
Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

A Journalist gave a brutal review of the new Melania documentary, which has been criticized by those who say it won't make back the huge fees spent to make it,
Share
Rawstory2026/02/08 09:08
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00