The post WIF Technical Analysis Jan 28 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Volume story – what participation tells us about conviction Volume Profile and MarketThe post WIF Technical Analysis Jan 28 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Volume story – what participation tells us about conviction Volume Profile and Market

WIF Technical Analysis Jan 28

Volume story – what participation tells us about conviction

Volume Profile and Market Participation

WIF’s 24-hour trading volume is hovering at the 119.16 million dollar level, which is about 15% below the recent 7-day average volume. Despite the price remaining flat at 0.33 dollars with 0% change, a distinct POC (Point of Control) has formed in the volume profile in the 0.32-0.33 range, indicating that market participants are concentrating at this level. Although in a downtrend, the persistently low volume signals waning seller conviction; instead of the high-volume sales expected for a healthy decline, dry volume is observed. This situation supports the price being stuck below EMA20 (0.35), while emphasizing the weakness in genuine market participation. Volume delta analysis shows buying volume more balanced relative to selling volume, which may signal hidden accumulation.

Accumulation or Distribution?

Accumulation Signals

Despite the price declining to 0.33 in a downtrend, the volume remaining low compared to recent averages suggests that smart money is accumulating. Particularly on the 1D timeframe, volume increase is observed around the 0.3217 support (score 72/100), with this level functioning as Value Area Low (VAL) and a potential accumulation zone. RSI at 42.55 approaching oversold shows volume divergence: while price makes lows, volume does not drop but stabilizes instead. This may indicate the ‘spring’ phase according to Wyckoff methodology. In MTF context, 3 strong support levels on 1W (including 0.2610) suggest long-term accumulation potential. Similar volume clusters are seen in WIF Spot Analysis details.

Distribution Risks

On the other hand, Supertrend being bearish and MACD histogram deepening negatively increases distribution risk. In the volume profile, upper tails (around 0.3844 resistance) extend without volume, signaling weak rally attempts. If volume spikes suddenly and pushes price above 0.3314 (score 68/100), it could be a fakeout followed by distribution. Although there’s only one resistance level on 3D timeframe, with 12 strong levels balanced across general MTF, a sudden volume increase could trigger distribution. Attention: Long/short ratio imbalance should be monitored in WIF Futures Analysis.

Price-Volume Alignment

Despite the price being in a downtrend with 0% change, volume lacks confirmation: volume does not increase on declines, indicating the move lacks conviction. For a healthy decline, we would expect up-volume on down-price divergence, but here volume on downs remains low – an unhealthy bearish structure. The price squeeze below EMA20 is not confirmed by volume; on the contrary, there’s potential bullish divergence (RSI stable). The 24-hour volume-price correlation is -0.12, weakly negative, meaning price isn’t even falling. This shows volume leading price, potentially signaling a reversal in advance. Bullish target 0.4606 (score 31) would be strong if supported by volume, while bearish 0.1731 requires high-volume breakdown.

Big Player Activity

At the institutional level, activity clusters around 0.32 support in large block trades (500k+ WIF), implying whale accumulation – though exact positions are unknowable. Volume footprint analysis shows aggressive buy orders absorbing passive sells. Over the past week, VWAP (Volume Weighted Average Price) has stabilized below 0.34, suggesting big players are protecting their cost basis. Divergence: As price falls, cumulative volume delta turns positive, indicating potential increasing institutional buying pressure. Still, caution is advised due to BTC dominance effects.

Bitcoin Correlation

While BTC rises +1.49% at 89,335 dollars, WIF staying flat signals decoupling in altcoins, but BTC Supertrend is bearish (supports 88,355-84,681). WIF’s correlation to BTC is 0.72; if BTC breaks 89,190 resistance, WIF could get lift to 0.3844, but if BTC slips below 86,075, WIF tests 0.2982 support. BTC dominance increase crushes alt volume; for WIF bullishness, BTC above 91,289 is required. Key BTC levels: Watch 88,355 support – breakdown activates WIF bearish target 0.2610.

Volume-Based Outlook

Volume indicates low conviction: Bias leans toward accumulation, expect volume increase at 0.3217. Volume spike required for breakout – bullish outlook above 0.41 Supertrend, bearish continuation on volume-less drop. Overall: Neutral-bullish bias, accumulation buildup. Risk: Distribution comes with volume explosion.

This analysis uses the market views and methodology of Chief Analyst Devrim Cacal.

Senior Technical Analyst: James Mitchell

6 years of crypto market analysis

This analysis is not investment advice. Do your own research.

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/analysis/wif-volume-analysis-january-28-2026-accumulation-distribution

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 7, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — HitPaw, a leader in AI-powered visual enhancement solutions, announced Comfy, a global content creation platform, is
Share
AI Journal2026/02/08 09:15
Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

A Journalist gave a brutal review of the new Melania documentary, which has been criticized by those who say it won't make back the huge fees spent to make it,
Share
Rawstory2026/02/08 09:08
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00