Introduction In one of the most significant social engineering breaches in crypto history, a hacker made off with over $282 million worth of Bitcoin and LitecoinIntroduction In one of the most significant social engineering breaches in crypto history, a hacker made off with over $282 million worth of Bitcoin and Litecoin

Crypto User Loses $282M in Bitcoin & Litecoin to Social Engineering Hack

Crypto User Loses $282m In Bitcoin & Litecoin To Social Engineering Hack

Introduction

In one of the most significant social engineering breaches in crypto history, a hacker made off with over $282 million worth of Bitcoin and Litecoin, highlighting ongoing vulnerabilities in digital asset security and the complexities of decentralized cross-chain infrastructure.

Key Takeaways

  • A sophisticated social engineering attack resulted in the theft of over $282 million in cryptocurrencies.
  • The attacker manipulated a hardware wallet owner into revealing their seed phrase, gaining complete control over the funds.
  • Funds were rapidly moved across multiple blockchains, including Ethereum, Ripple, and Litecoin, using decentralized bridges like THORChain.
  • Partial recovery efforts successfully froze approximately $700,000 worth of assets shortly after the breach.

Tickers mentioned: $BTC, $LTC, $XMR, $ETH, $XRP

Sentiment: Negative

Price impact: Negative. The attack exposes security gaps and will likely influence market confidence and price stability.

Trading idea (Not Financial Advice): Hold. The event underscores risks that merit cautious positioning until clarity on security improvements emerges.

Market Context

The incident underscores ongoing challenges in crypto security, particularly in the context of decentralized cross-chain Ethereum and altcoin infrastructure, which continue to see both innovation and exploitation.

Detailed Overview

A major social engineering attack has resulted in a theft of more than $282 million in cryptocurrencies, including Bitcoin and Litecoin, in what is considered one of the largest such breaches in crypto history. The theft was executed on January 10, 2026, around 11:00 UTC, after the victim was deceived into revealing their seed phrase linked to a hardware wallet. Blockchain investigator ZachXBT detailed that the attacker gained full control of the wallet and swiftly moved the stolen assets across multiple networks to obfuscate their origin.

The stolen assets included approximately 2.05 million Litecoin, valued at around $153 million, and 1,459 Bitcoin, worth roughly $139 million. Subsequently, the attacker converted the assets into Monero via various instant exchange services, leading to a sharp spike in Monero’s market price. This movement was facilitated through the use of decentralized bridges such as THORChain, which enabled the attacker to transfer assets across Ethereum, Ripple, and Litecoin blockchains without relying on centralized exchanges. This activity reignited discussions about the potential risks posed by decentralized cross-chain infrastructures, particularly regarding their vulnerability to large-scale thefts.

Users criticize THORChain for facilitating the hacker’s ability to shift funds. Source: Quit

Security firm ZeroShadow reported that it managed to trace and flag a portion of the stolen funds within minutes of the attack, successfully freezing approximately $700,000 before they could be converted into privacy tokens. ZeroShadow identified the victim through a Bitcoin address linked to an individual who had been lured into sharing their seed phrase following impersonation of Trezor “Value Wallet” support.

Blockchain analyst ZachXBT dismissed speculation that state-sponsored actors might be involved, clarifying that it was unlikely to be an operation linked to North Korea or similar entities. The incident serves as a stark reminder of the persistent vulnerabilities in crypto security, especially concerning social engineering tactics targeting individual users and the growing risks associated with decentralized cross-chain technologies.

Last year, a US-based elderly holder lost over $330 million in Bitcoin through a social engineering scam, highlighting that such attacks continue to target even long-term, low-activity investors. As the industry reacts, security improvements and regulatory developments remain critical to restoring confidence in digital assets.

This article was originally published as Crypto User Loses $282M in Bitcoin & Litecoin to Social Engineering Hack on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

Market Opportunity
CROSS Logo
CROSS Price(CROSS)
$0.13108
$0.13108$0.13108
-0.02%
USD
CROSS (CROSS) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41
Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Exploring how biases in the peer-review system impact researchers' choices, showing how principles of fairness relate to the production of scientific knowledge based on topic importance and hardness.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/17 23:15
The Role of Reference Points in Achieving Equilibrium Efficiency in Fair and Socially Just Economies

The Role of Reference Points in Achieving Equilibrium Efficiency in Fair and Socially Just Economies

This article explores how a simple change in the reference point can achieve a Pareto-efficient equilibrium in both free and fair economies and those with social justice.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/17 22:30