The post AI Models Suggest XRP Could Climb to $15–$22 With BIS Tier-1 Status appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jake Claver suggests XRP moving closer to globalThe post AI Models Suggest XRP Could Climb to $15–$22 With BIS Tier-1 Status appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jake Claver suggests XRP moving closer to global

AI Models Suggest XRP Could Climb to $15–$22 With BIS Tier-1 Status

  • Jake Claver suggests XRP moving closer to global bridge currency recognition status.
  • Basel framework currently restricts banks to holding 1-2% crypto versus capital base.
  • AI analysis estimates $15-22 price range if regulatory classification changes occur.

Digital Ascension Group CEO Jake Claver recently proposed that XRP may eventually earn recognition from the Bank for International Settlements as a premier banking asset. His X post sparked discussion about how regulatory reclassification could affect the token’s market valuation.

The suggestion arrives as institutional investors examine whether digital currencies can achieve parity with traditional safe-haven banking reserves. Current Basel banking regulations maintain strict separation between cryptocurrency holdings and the highest-quality capital categories.

Banking regulations maintain strict asset hierarchies

The Basel framework divides bank capital into distinct tiers based on stability and loss-absorption capacity. The top category encompasses cash held at central banks, sovereign debt from AAA to AA- rated nations, and physical gold stored in allocated vaults. These holdings face minimal capital charges and provide maximum balance sheet strength during market turbulence.

Common Equity Tier-1 requires banks to maintain 4.5% minimum ratios against risk-weighted exposures. This category comprises shareholder equity, accumulated profits, and disclosed reserve accounts. Additional qualifying instruments include convertible securities that transform into equity during distress periods.

Digital assets currently occupy a separate regulatory space. BIS guidelines partition cryptocurrencies into two distinct groupings based on backing mechanisms and stability characteristics.

Crypto assets face restrictive capital treatment

The first grouping encompasses tokenized representations of tangible assets and stablecoins meeting rigorous collateral and redemption standards. Banks may apply similar risk weights as the underlying reference assets. Algorithmic stablecoins fail to meet these criteria.

The second grouping contains all non-collateralized digital currencies including XRP, Bitcoin, and Ethereum. These face maximum capital penalties under Basel standards. Financial institutions can allocate only 1-2% of their tier-one capital base toward such holdings under current guidelines.

This restrictive treatment stems from volatility concerns and lack of government backing. Regulators view unbacked cryptocurrencies as high-risk speculative instruments rather than stable reserve assets.

Google Gemini AI evaluated hypothetical price implications if regulatory classification shifted dramatically. The analysis suggested banks treating XRP like traditional reserves would eliminate current capital penalties. Under this scenario, institutional demand could drive trading ranges between $15 and $22 by 2026.

The assessment remains theoretical as no regulatory pathway exists for such reclassification. Basel rules explicitly reserve top-tier status for government-backed instruments, shareholder equity, and precious metals. Cryptocurrency operates under separate standards designed for volatile assets.

Source: https://thenewscrypto.com/ai-models-suggest-xrp-could-climb-to-15-22-with-bis-tier-1-status/

Market Opportunity
Sleepless AI Logo
Sleepless AI Price(AI)
$0.04114
$0.04114$0.04114
-0.89%
USD
Sleepless AI (AI) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
XRP Holds $1.88 Fibonacci Support as 3-Day Chart Signals Bullish Continuation

XRP Holds $1.88 Fibonacci Support as 3-Day Chart Signals Bullish Continuation

XRP is once again drawing attention on higher timeframes as its 3-day chart begins to mirror past bullish phases. Market observers are closely watching how the
Share
Tronweekly2026/01/11 21:30
Russians ask government hotlines whether pensions are paid in crypto

Russians ask government hotlines whether pensions are paid in crypto

                                                                               Crypto-related questions about pension payments are reaching Russia’s Social 
Share
Coinstats2026/01/11 20:13