The post Crypto Reps to Fly into DC this Week to Address Market Structure Bill appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. With a markup event on legislation to addressThe post Crypto Reps to Fly into DC this Week to Address Market Structure Bill appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. With a markup event on legislation to address

Crypto Reps to Fly into DC this Week to Address Market Structure Bill

With a markup event on legislation to address digital asset market structure scheduled for next week, representatives from cryptocurrency companies are expected to fly into Washington, D.C., and some will engage with lawmakers on the bill.

Speaking with Cointelegraph on Tuesday, Cody Carbone, CEO of crypto advocacy organization The Digital Chamber, said it was “possible, if not likely,” that the Senate Agriculture Committee would hold a markup on its version of the Responsible Financial Innovation Act (RFIA) — the market structure bill — at the same time as the Senate Banking Committee. Senator Tim Scott, who chairs the banking committee, said on Tuesday that the body would vote on market structure on Jan. 15.

Source: Cody Carbone

Ahead of consideration by both committees, the Digital Chamber said it had been “intimately involved” in drafting the legislation and had been invited by lawmakers to provide feedback on different versions of the bills. Carbone told Cointelegraph that the organization will bring in more than 50 member companies on Thursday “to continue to educate Senate offices on why we need a bill” and answer related questions.

“We’ve been very intentional given our diverse membership to bring in participants from all across the digital asset ecosystem: exchanges, token issuers, banks, Bitcoin miners […] infrastructure providers, DeFi protocols,” said Carbone. 

Related: Ray Dalio says 2026 US midterm elections could reverse Trump policies

Early drafts of the bill, expected to be one of the most significant pieces of legislation related to crypto and blockchain, showed that lawmakers planned to give the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) more authority in regulating digital assets. To date, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has taken a leading role in providing regulation and enforcement over many crypto companies.

Will the US midterms affect support for the bill?

On Monday, investment bank TD Cowen reportedly released a notice to investors warning that the RFIA was more likely to pass Congress in 2027, with final implementation potentially as late as 2029. The bank speculated that the 2026 midterm elections could cause some Senate Democrats to withdraw support for the bill, with Republicans potentially losing majority control in November.

This sentiment was similarly echoed by Republican Senator and Banking Committee member Thom Tillis, who in October said lawmakers should act “by the first part of January, February” to avoid conflicts with campaigning for the 2026 elections.

“Given the momentum of where we’re at and the progress that has been done between Republicans and Democrats over the last even just three weeks, through the holidays and the new year, it’s hard to bet against that this bill is going to get done early this year,” said Carbone. “There is a real desire to get it done before politics becomes a big factor in D.C.”

Progress on the bill in the Senate was likely delayed in October after Congress failed to reach a funding agreement, triggering the US government’s longest shutdown in the country’s history.

Congress later reached a stopgap agreement to fund the government until Jan. 31. However, political concerns could cause another shutdown in a matter of weeks, potentially delaying the market structure bill in the Senate again.

Magazine: How crypto laws changed in 2025 — and how they’ll change in 2026

Source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/crypto-companies-dc-market-structure-bill?utm_source=rss_feed&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=rss_partner_inbound

Market Opportunity
Fly Trade Logo
Fly Trade Price(FLY)
$0.0267
$0.0267$0.0267
-4.54%
USD
Fly Trade (FLY) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
XRP Holds $1.88 Fibonacci Support as 3-Day Chart Signals Bullish Continuation

XRP Holds $1.88 Fibonacci Support as 3-Day Chart Signals Bullish Continuation

XRP is once again drawing attention on higher timeframes as its 3-day chart begins to mirror past bullish phases. Market observers are closely watching how the
Share
Tronweekly2026/01/11 21:30
Russians ask government hotlines whether pensions are paid in crypto

Russians ask government hotlines whether pensions are paid in crypto

                                                                               Crypto-related questions about pension payments are reaching Russia’s Social 
Share
Coinstats2026/01/11 20:13