After businesses and consumers spent 2024 testing out new AI tools and last year rolling them out widely, the technology now faces tough questions about whetherAfter businesses and consumers spent 2024 testing out new AI tools and last year rolling them out widely, the technology now faces tough questions about whether

AI faces a reality check as investors demand proof it can deliver real value

After businesses and consumers spent 2024 testing out new AI tools and last year rolling them out widely, the technology now faces tough questions about whether it can deliver on its promises. 

While hundreds of thousands of companies and several hundred million people put AI to work in various ways, some found it helpful while others ran into problems that led to costly mistakes.

The coming months will see an intense examination of whether AI systems work reliably enough and make financial sense for the massive amounts of money being poured into them. Investment in AI equipment and infrastructure could reach $500bn in 2026, making it crucial for the industry to answer three major challenges.

Growth strategy hits a wall as investors demand results

The first issue centers on whether AI’s growth strategy has reached its limits. In 2019, researcher Rich Sutton published a piece called “The Bitter Lesson” that explained how feeding more information and computing power into deep learning systems proved the best way to make them stronger. Companies like OpenAI proved this approach right by creating increasingly powerful systems that needed more and more computing resources.

However, Sutton now joins other researchers in believing this method is losing steam. This doesn’t mean AI development will stop making progress. Instead, companies will need to show investors they can write better computer programs and find other ways to advance the technology that uses less energy. Experts predict neurosymbolic AI, which combines current data-based systems with rule-following programs, will get much more attention this year.

The second challenge involves whether major players can make money as AI becomes more common and ordinary. Tech giants like Alphabet, Amazon, and Microsoft will keep using AI to lower costs and improve services that already reach billions of people worldwide.

But newer companies such as OpenAI and Anthropic, which plan to go public this year, must prove they can build lasting advantages that keep competitors away. Business values across the sector shot up in 2025, but companies will soon be judged more carefully on their individual merits.

Chinese competitors win users with cheaper, open systems

The third question concerns how American tech companies will handle the growing success of Chinese AI systems that anyone can modify and use. About a year ago, a Chinese company called DeepSeek surprised the industry by releasing a high-quality thinking model that cost far less to train than similar American products.

Since then, Chinese systems that are more focused, cheaper, and easier to adjust have grabbed significant market presence. Research from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Hugging Face showed that Chinese-made systems, which anyone can access, jumped ahead of American ones, making up 17 percent of all downloads.

Even Sam Altman, who runs OpenAI, said his company may have picked “the wrong side of history” by mainly building expensive, private systems that users cannot modify. American firms are now putting out more open systems to compete in this space.

AI holds real promise when used carefully. It can make business operations smoother, help workers get more done, and speed up scientific research. But users and investors will now separate services and companies that provide genuine value from those simply riding the wave of AI excitement.

If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter.

Market Opportunity
Sleepless AI Logo
Sleepless AI Price(AI)
$0.04218
$0.04218$0.04218
+2.13%
USD
Sleepless AI (AI) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Solana Prepares Major Consensus Upgrade with Alpenglow Protocol

Solana Prepares Major Consensus Upgrade with Alpenglow Protocol

TLDR: Alpenglow reduces Solana finality from 12.8 seconds to 100-150 milliseconds, a 100-fold improvement. Votor enables one or two-round block finalization through
Share
Blockonomi2026/01/03 02:29
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41