Ethereum has just smashed its L1 transaction record by processing 2.2 million transactions in one day, all while doing so with lower gas fees than it used to.  Ethereum has just smashed its L1 transaction record by processing 2.2 million transactions in one day, all while doing so with lower gas fees than it used to. 

Ethereum smashes L1 record with 2.2 million transactions in a single day

2025/12/31 23:39
4 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Ethereum has just smashed its L1 transaction record by processing 2.2 million transactions in one day, all while doing so with lower gas fees than it used to. 

Data from Etherscan has revealed the Ethereum mainnet logged about 2.2 million transactions on December 30 at gas fee levels users could only dream about even six months ago. The new transaction record surpasses the mainnet’s all-time number set in 2021. 

Ethereum smashes L1 transaction record count with December 30's 2.2MEthereum sets a new record for daily transactions. Source: Etherscan

This is happening as quarterly deployments on the network have surged with a record 8.7 million smart contracts deployed in the last quarter of the year. 

Ethereum L1 has a new transaction record  

The latest achievement of the network regarding transaction count has mostly been linked to the fundamental upgrades done to its architecture, with the most recent being the Fusaka upgrade. The Fusaka upgrade happened quietly, but it increased gas limits to 33% and enabled higher throughput that did not require higher fees or allow congestion.

There was also the Pectra upgrade, which happened earlier in the year, enhancing validator performance and staking flexibility while laying the groundwork for future scalability issues. 

Other factors that may have contributed to the surge in transaction volume include increased DeFi activity, a resurgent interest in NFT marketplaces, and L2 transactions. 

High gas fees are no longer an Ethereum bottleneck 

In the past, building on Ethereum was a game of funds because almost everything you could do on the chain triggered microtransactions, which were not always micro in sum. 

It is why meme culture on the network never took off as it has on Solana, where the gas fees are almost negligible. However, that might change in the future because even as transaction volume has gone up, gas fees have gone down. 

An average transaction now costs around 17 cents, which is a far cry from the $2.15 average transaction cost six months earlier. The fee reduction has also persisted despite the increase in transactions, which dismisses the old saying that gas increases with network usage and congestion. 

As for what made this possible, that would be the protocol-level optimizations that have taken place via recent upgrades. Some of those upgrades were deliberately tailored towards enhancing gas efficiency and block space utilization, like the EIP-7702 implementation, the Blob storage efficiency, validator optimization, and state management. 

All those upgrades improved various things, and those technical improvements have translated directly into user benefits. So from now on, average transactions will cost no more than 12 cents, while complex DeFi interactions will range from $1 to $3, unlike before when they would cost $25-$50. 

Ethereum’s plans for 2026

Since the Fusaka update on the Ethereum (ETH) network was a success, developers have shifted their focus to the next major items on the roadmap. That includes more upgrades like Glamsterdam, scheduled for release in 2026, and Hegota, postponed to a later date, which are expected to play a decisive role in Ethereum’s goals of scalability, transaction costs, and censorship resistance.

The Glamsterdam update has two main features: block-level access lists and enshrined proposer-builder separation (ePBS).

Block-level access lists are considered critical, especially for complex applications like DeFi, while the ePBS mechanism aims to increase the network’s transaction capacity while lowering costs. 

Initially, a more robust anti-censorship feature was planned for Glamsterdam. However, it has been postponed to the Hegota update. Note that there is currently no clear timeline for Hegota yet, and it’s not certain which Ethereum Improvement Proposals (EIPs) will be included in this release. 

So far, only the FOCIL (Fork-Choice Inclusion Lists) feature is in the “under consideration” status. The feature aims to guarantee that every valid transaction is included in a block, but the proposal has sparked intense debate within the Ethereum developer community that has persisted throughout 2025.

Discussions regarding which features will be added in the Hegota update will begin from January 8 and is expected to have been finalized by the end of February.

Sign up to Bybit and start trading with $30,050 in welcome gifts

Market Opportunity
SIX Logo
SIX Price(SIX)
$0.00902
$0.00902$0.00902
-1.42%
USD
SIX (SIX) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Navigating The Critical Sideways Bias With Safe-Haven Support

Navigating The Critical Sideways Bias With Safe-Haven Support

The post Navigating The Critical Sideways Bias With Safe-Haven Support appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. USD/CAD Forecast: Navigating The Critical Sideways Bias
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/09 17:39
Support at 1.15 under pressure – ING

Support at 1.15 under pressure – ING

The post Support at 1.15 under pressure – ING appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. ING’s Chris Turner highlights that strong support just below 1.1500 in EUR/USD
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/09 17:19
Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

BitcoinWorld Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security Ever wondered why withdrawing your staked Ethereum (ETH) isn’t an instant process? It’s a question that often sparks debate within the crypto community. Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin recently stepped forward to defend the network’s approximately 45-day ETH unstaking period, asserting its crucial role in safeguarding the network’s integrity. This lengthy waiting time, while sometimes seen as an inconvenience, is a deliberate design choice with profound implications for security. Why is the ETH Unstaking Period a Vital Security Measure? Vitalik Buterin’s defense comes amidst comparisons to other networks, like Solana, which boast significantly shorter unstaking times. He drew a compelling parallel to military operations, explaining that an army cannot function effectively if its soldiers can simply abandon their posts at a moment’s notice. Similarly, a blockchain network requires a stable and committed validator set to maintain its security. The current ETH unstaking period isn’t merely an arbitrary delay. It acts as a critical buffer, providing the network with sufficient time to detect and respond to potential malicious activities. If validators could instantly exit, it would open doors for sophisticated attacks, jeopardizing the entire system. Currently, Ethereum boasts over one million active validators, collectively staking approximately 35.6 million ETH, representing about 30% of the total supply. This massive commitment underpins the network’s robust security model, and the unstaking period helps preserve this stability. Network Security: Ethereum’s Paramount Concern A shorter ETH unstaking period might seem appealing for liquidity, but it introduces significant risks. Imagine a scenario where a large number of validators, potentially colluding, could quickly withdraw their stake after committing a malicious act. Without a substantial delay, the network would have limited time to penalize them or mitigate the damage. This “exit queue” mechanism is designed to prevent sudden validator exodus, which could lead to: Reduced decentralization: A rapid drop in active validators could concentrate power among fewer participants. Increased vulnerability to attacks: A smaller, less stable validator set is easier to compromise. Network instability: Frequent and unpredictable changes in validator numbers can lead to performance issues and consensus failures. Therefore, the extended period is not a bug; it’s a feature. It’s a calculated trade-off between immediate liquidity for stakers and the foundational security of the entire Ethereum ecosystem. Ethereum vs. Solana: Different Approaches to Unstaking When discussing the ETH unstaking period, many point to networks like Solana, which offers a much quicker two-day unstaking process. While this might seem like an advantage for stakers seeking rapid access to their funds, it reflects fundamental differences in network architecture and security philosophies. Solana’s design prioritizes speed and immediate liquidity, often relying on different consensus mechanisms and validator economics to manage security risks. Ethereum, on the other hand, with its proof-of-stake evolution from proof-of-work, has adopted a more cautious approach to ensure its transition and long-term stability are uncompromised. Each network makes design choices based on its unique goals and threat models. Ethereum’s substantial value and its role as a foundational layer for countless dApps necessitate an extremely robust security posture, making the current unstaking duration a deliberate and necessary component. What Does the ETH Unstaking Period Mean for Stakers? For individuals and institutions staking ETH, understanding the ETH unstaking period is crucial for managing expectations and investment strategies. It means that while staking offers attractive rewards, it also comes with a commitment to the network’s long-term health. Here are key considerations for stakers: Liquidity Planning: Stakers should view their staked ETH as a longer-term commitment, not immediately liquid capital. Risk Management: The delay inherently reduces the ability to react quickly to market volatility with staked assets. Network Contribution: By participating, stakers contribute directly to the security and decentralization of Ethereum, reinforcing its value proposition. While the current waiting period may not be “optimal” in every sense, as Buterin acknowledged, simply shortening it without addressing the underlying security implications would be a dangerous gamble for the network’s reliability. In conclusion, Vitalik Buterin’s defense of the lengthy ETH unstaking period underscores a fundamental principle: network security cannot be compromised for the sake of convenience. It is a vital mechanism that protects Ethereum’s integrity, ensuring its stability and trustworthiness as a leading blockchain platform. This deliberate design choice, while requiring patience from stakers, ultimately fortifies the entire ecosystem against potential threats, paving the way for a more secure and reliable decentralized future. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What is the main reason for Ethereum’s long unstaking period? A1: The primary reason is network security. A lengthy ETH unstaking period prevents malicious actors from quickly withdrawing their stake after an attack, giving the network time to detect and penalize them, thus maintaining stability and integrity. Q2: How long is the current ETH unstaking period? A2: The current ETH unstaking period is approximately 45 days. This duration can fluctuate based on network conditions and the number of validators in the exit queue. Q3: How does Ethereum’s unstaking period compare to other blockchains? A3: Ethereum’s unstaking period is notably longer than some other networks, such as Solana, which has a two-day period. This difference reflects varying network architectures and security priorities. Q4: Does the unstaking period affect ETH stakers? A4: Yes, it means stakers need to plan their liquidity carefully, as their staked ETH is not immediately accessible. It encourages a longer-term commitment to the network, aligning staker interests with Ethereum’s stability. Q5: Could the ETH unstaking period be shortened in the future? A5: While Vitalik Buterin acknowledged the current period might not be “optimal,” any significant shortening would likely require extensive research and network upgrades to ensure security isn’t compromised. For now, the focus remains on maintaining robust network defenses. Found this article insightful? Share it with your friends and fellow crypto enthusiasts on social media to spread awareness about the critical role of the ETH unstaking period in Ethereum’s security! To learn more about the latest Ethereum trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Ethereum’s institutional adoption. This post Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 15:30