More than 80% of the tokens launched this year are trading underwater, marking a definitive shift in the market's appetite for venture-backed cryptocurrency projectsMore than 80% of the tokens launched this year are trading underwater, marking a definitive shift in the market's appetite for venture-backed cryptocurrency projects

Crypto insiders stopped buying new tokens 2 years ago, creating a liquidity trap that’s crushing retail buyers

More than 80% of the tokens launched this year are trading underwater, marking a definitive shift in the market's appetite for venture-backed cryptocurrency projects.

Data from Memento Research showed that it tracked 118 major token generation events in 2025 and found that 100 of them, or 84.7%, are trading below their opening fully diluted valuations. At the same time, the median token in that cohort is down 71% from its launch price.

Crypto TGEsCrypto TGEs Breakdown in 2025 (Source: Memento Research)

According to the firm:

The mechanics of the  crash

To understand the severity of the drawdown, it is crucial to distinguish between market capitalization and Fully Diluted Valuation (FDV).

Retail investors typically buy the circulating float, which is usually the 10% to 15% of tokens actually available for trading.

However, the price of that float is increasingly determined by the FDV, which represents the project's total value once all venture capital and team tokens vest.

Memento's report showed that the “low float, high FDV” model, where projects launch with a small circulating supply but a massive total valuation, has hit a hard ceiling. It noted:

This meant that high-profile projects with high FDVs like Berachain saw their valuations compress violently after launch.

For context, Berachain, a layer-1 blockchain that commanded significant hype, saw its implied valuation drop from over $4 billion to roughly $300 million.

Crypto TGEsCrypto TGEs With The Most Significant Losses (Source: Memento Research)

While these drops represent “paper” losses for locked-up insiders, they translate to real losses for buyers of the liquid token.

Speaking on this situation, Alexander Lin, co-founder of venture firm Reforge, pointed out:

The liquidity vacuum

Meanwhile, this token's underperformance was not solely due to poor tokenomics. It could also be linked to a brutal macro environment that saw the broader crypto market struggle.

According to CryptoSlate's data, the broader crypto market shed approximately $1.2 trillion in value between mid-October and late November.

During this period, Bitcoin retraced roughly 30% from its $126,000 highs to under $90,000. Still, it remained the primary venue for institutional flows and interest in the crypto market.

This created a tiered liquidity environment. The approval of Spot ETFs in the United States has successfully channeled capital into Bitcoin and Ethereum, but it has arguably cannibalized demand for riskier, long-tail assets.

So, institutional allocators now have a regulated, liquid avenue for crypto exposure that does not require them to diligence new protocols or manage complex custody risks.

Jeff Dorman, Chief Investment Officer at digital asset manager Arca, points to this shift as a primary driver of the TGE failure rate. He noted:

When liquid hedge funds and family offices abstain from participating in TGEs, the “bid” side of the order book evaporates.

Without institutional support to absorb the initial selling pressure from airdrop recipients and market makers, prices have nowhere to go but down.

So, most crypto TGEs for this year launched into a liquidity vacuum, hoping for a retail frenzy that never materialized.

The ‘predatory' structure

Nonetheless, the sheer consistency of the losses has reignited a fierce debate over the ethics of the current crypto venture capital model.

Critics argue that the industry has optimized for “extraction” rather than value creation, with insiders incentivized to sell into whatever liquidity exists before the project has established a sustainable revenue model.

Omid Malekan, an adjunct professor at Columbia Business School, suggests that the market is finally punishing this behavior. He said:

Meanwhile, there were rare crypto projects that bucked the red sea trend, though they often relied on idiosyncratic catalysts.

For context, Aster, a project backed by Binance founder Changpeng Zhao, saw its valuation surge approximately 750% post-launch, growing from a strategic FDV of $675 million to over $5 billion.

Aster's Growth Bolster Perpetual DEXsAster's Growth Bolster Perpetual DEXs (Source: Memento Research)

Similarly, projects like Humanity and Pieverse maintained their value.

Yet, even among the winners, a pattern emerges: none of the tokens trading above their listing price launched with an FDV of $1 billion or more.

Essentially, the market proved willing to support modest valuations where upside was visible, and it flatly rejected the “unicorn” premiums attached to unproven protocols.

Preparing for 2026

The wreckage of 2025 provides a distinct roadmap for issuers and investors heading into 2026.

The market has signaled that it will no longer accept tokens that serve merely as fundraising mechanisms. The era of the “governance token” that does nothing but vote on forum posts is ending.

Nathaniel Sokoll-Ward, co-founder of RWA platform Manifest Finance, describes the current state of token design as “cargo cult thinking” because these projects mimic the aesthetics of successful networks without the underlying mechanics.

He questioned:

Considering this, the mandate for token issuers is to launch differently next year. The “Price to Reality” ratio must reset; anchoring opening valuations to single-digit multiples of actual annualized fees is the only way to build secondary market support.

Furthermore, projects must “Float like a Business.” The practice of releasing 5% of a token's supply to simulate scarcity is dead. Issuers need to target initial floats of 15–25% to deepen liquidity and reduce the volatility of early unlocks.

For investors, the shift is behavioral.

Memento Research's Ash urged investors to treat the TGEs as earnings reports, not lottery tickets. According to him, investors in these projects should map the unlock schedule for the next 30 to 90 days, verify that market-maker terms provide real depth, and track specific catalysts, such as listings and incentives.

Meanwhile, most importantly, he advised investors to be patient, saying:

The post Crypto insiders stopped buying new tokens 2 years ago, creating a liquidity trap that’s crushing retail buyers appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Market Opportunity
Moonveil Logo
Moonveil Price(MORE)
$0.002618
$0.002618$0.002618
+1.23%
USD
Moonveil (MORE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Here’s How Consumers May Benefit From Lower Interest Rates

Here’s How Consumers May Benefit From Lower Interest Rates

The post Here’s How Consumers May Benefit From Lower Interest Rates appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline The Federal Reserve on Wednesday opted to ease interest rates for the first time in months, leading the way for potentially lower mortgage rates, bond yields and a likely boost to cryptocurrency over the coming weeks. Average long-term mortgage rates dropped to their lowest levels in months ahead of the central bank’s policy shift. Copyright{2018} The Associated Press. All rights reserved. Key Facts The central bank’s policymaking panel voted this week to lower interest rates, which have sat between 4.25% and 4.5% since December, to a new range of 4% and 4.25%. How Will Lower Interest Rates Impact Mortgage Rates? Mortgage rates tend to fall before and during a period of interest rate cuts: The average 30-year fixed-rate mortgage dropped to 6.35% from 6.5% last week, the lowest level since October 2024, mortgage buyer Freddie Mac reported. Borrowing costs on 15-year fixed-rate mortgages also dropped to 5.5% from 5.6% as they neared the year-ago rate of 5.27%. When the Federal Reserve lowered the funds rate to between 0% and 0.25% during the pandemic, 30-year mortgage rates hit record lows between 2.7% and 3% by the end of 2020, according to data published by Freddie Mac. Consumers who refinanced their mortgages in 2020 saved about $5.3 billion annually as rates dropped, according to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Similarly, mortgage rates spiked around 7% as interest rates were hiked in 2022 and 2023, though mortgage rates appeared to react within weeks of the Fed opting to cut or raise rates. How Do Treasury Bonds Respond To Lower Interest Rates? Long-term Treasury yields are more directly influenced by interest rates, as lower rates tend to result in lower yields. When the Fed pushed rates to near zero during the pandemic, 10-year Treasury yields fell to an all-time low of 0.5%. As…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 05:59
Two new wallets withdrew 26,241 ZEC from Binance within 12 hours, worth $13.5 million.

Two new wallets withdrew 26,241 ZEC from Binance within 12 hours, worth $13.5 million.

PANews reported on December 28 that, according to Lookonchain monitoring, two newly created wallets withdrew 26,241 ZEC (US$13.5 million) from Binance in the past
Share
PANews2025/12/28 09:13
Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

BitcoinWorld Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security Ever wondered why withdrawing your staked Ethereum (ETH) isn’t an instant process? It’s a question that often sparks debate within the crypto community. Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin recently stepped forward to defend the network’s approximately 45-day ETH unstaking period, asserting its crucial role in safeguarding the network’s integrity. This lengthy waiting time, while sometimes seen as an inconvenience, is a deliberate design choice with profound implications for security. Why is the ETH Unstaking Period a Vital Security Measure? Vitalik Buterin’s defense comes amidst comparisons to other networks, like Solana, which boast significantly shorter unstaking times. He drew a compelling parallel to military operations, explaining that an army cannot function effectively if its soldiers can simply abandon their posts at a moment’s notice. Similarly, a blockchain network requires a stable and committed validator set to maintain its security. The current ETH unstaking period isn’t merely an arbitrary delay. It acts as a critical buffer, providing the network with sufficient time to detect and respond to potential malicious activities. If validators could instantly exit, it would open doors for sophisticated attacks, jeopardizing the entire system. Currently, Ethereum boasts over one million active validators, collectively staking approximately 35.6 million ETH, representing about 30% of the total supply. This massive commitment underpins the network’s robust security model, and the unstaking period helps preserve this stability. Network Security: Ethereum’s Paramount Concern A shorter ETH unstaking period might seem appealing for liquidity, but it introduces significant risks. Imagine a scenario where a large number of validators, potentially colluding, could quickly withdraw their stake after committing a malicious act. Without a substantial delay, the network would have limited time to penalize them or mitigate the damage. This “exit queue” mechanism is designed to prevent sudden validator exodus, which could lead to: Reduced decentralization: A rapid drop in active validators could concentrate power among fewer participants. Increased vulnerability to attacks: A smaller, less stable validator set is easier to compromise. Network instability: Frequent and unpredictable changes in validator numbers can lead to performance issues and consensus failures. Therefore, the extended period is not a bug; it’s a feature. It’s a calculated trade-off between immediate liquidity for stakers and the foundational security of the entire Ethereum ecosystem. Ethereum vs. Solana: Different Approaches to Unstaking When discussing the ETH unstaking period, many point to networks like Solana, which offers a much quicker two-day unstaking process. While this might seem like an advantage for stakers seeking rapid access to their funds, it reflects fundamental differences in network architecture and security philosophies. Solana’s design prioritizes speed and immediate liquidity, often relying on different consensus mechanisms and validator economics to manage security risks. Ethereum, on the other hand, with its proof-of-stake evolution from proof-of-work, has adopted a more cautious approach to ensure its transition and long-term stability are uncompromised. Each network makes design choices based on its unique goals and threat models. Ethereum’s substantial value and its role as a foundational layer for countless dApps necessitate an extremely robust security posture, making the current unstaking duration a deliberate and necessary component. What Does the ETH Unstaking Period Mean for Stakers? For individuals and institutions staking ETH, understanding the ETH unstaking period is crucial for managing expectations and investment strategies. It means that while staking offers attractive rewards, it also comes with a commitment to the network’s long-term health. Here are key considerations for stakers: Liquidity Planning: Stakers should view their staked ETH as a longer-term commitment, not immediately liquid capital. Risk Management: The delay inherently reduces the ability to react quickly to market volatility with staked assets. Network Contribution: By participating, stakers contribute directly to the security and decentralization of Ethereum, reinforcing its value proposition. While the current waiting period may not be “optimal” in every sense, as Buterin acknowledged, simply shortening it without addressing the underlying security implications would be a dangerous gamble for the network’s reliability. In conclusion, Vitalik Buterin’s defense of the lengthy ETH unstaking period underscores a fundamental principle: network security cannot be compromised for the sake of convenience. It is a vital mechanism that protects Ethereum’s integrity, ensuring its stability and trustworthiness as a leading blockchain platform. This deliberate design choice, while requiring patience from stakers, ultimately fortifies the entire ecosystem against potential threats, paving the way for a more secure and reliable decentralized future. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What is the main reason for Ethereum’s long unstaking period? A1: The primary reason is network security. A lengthy ETH unstaking period prevents malicious actors from quickly withdrawing their stake after an attack, giving the network time to detect and penalize them, thus maintaining stability and integrity. Q2: How long is the current ETH unstaking period? A2: The current ETH unstaking period is approximately 45 days. This duration can fluctuate based on network conditions and the number of validators in the exit queue. Q3: How does Ethereum’s unstaking period compare to other blockchains? A3: Ethereum’s unstaking period is notably longer than some other networks, such as Solana, which has a two-day period. This difference reflects varying network architectures and security priorities. Q4: Does the unstaking period affect ETH stakers? A4: Yes, it means stakers need to plan their liquidity carefully, as their staked ETH is not immediately accessible. It encourages a longer-term commitment to the network, aligning staker interests with Ethereum’s stability. Q5: Could the ETH unstaking period be shortened in the future? A5: While Vitalik Buterin acknowledged the current period might not be “optimal,” any significant shortening would likely require extensive research and network upgrades to ensure security isn’t compromised. For now, the focus remains on maintaining robust network defenses. Found this article insightful? Share it with your friends and fellow crypto enthusiasts on social media to spread awareness about the critical role of the ETH unstaking period in Ethereum’s security! To learn more about the latest Ethereum trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Ethereum’s institutional adoption. This post Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 15:30