The post Crypto experts fiercely against possible exclusion of Bitcoin treasuries from MSCI indexes appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto professionals are opposed to a possible move to exclude Bitcoin treasuries from MSCI indexes, arguing that such a move could cut investors off from a lucrative market niche. The MSCI is mulling excluding DATs that have invested over 50% of their assets in Bitcoin or other crypto, claiming they are more investment funds than operating firms. However, the idea has not only drawn fierce backlash from the industry but also from industry leaders such as Michael Saylor of Strategy and Viek Ramaswamy of Strive Asset Management. The MSCI announced its possible exclusion plans in October, with a final decision expected to be reached at the beginning of next year.  Meanwhile, players in the crypto market emphasize that the MSCI’s exclusion of DATs from its indexes is a mistake. Adam Levine, Fireblocks’ CEO, said the MSCI plan might backfire and will likely not play well with institutional investors. He noted that these institutional investors have already warmed up to crypto in recent years and may be forced to rebalance their holdings to track the index.  Levine claims businesses could miss out on tokenized equity The Fireblocks CEO pointed out that the MSCI is introducing the risk of missing key market players if it leaves out companies that have a meaningful presence in the crypto space. He further compared it to the equivalence of intentionally ignoring early internet companies 30 years ago, especially now that businesses are innovating with tokenized equity and stablecoins.   Meanwhile, Spencer Hallarn, the head of OTC trading at GSR, said the decisions by the MSCI and other index providers to exclude DATs have real implications on the broader industry, and by extension, the crypto they hold. He, however, believes that the rumored exclusion has been well planned for, so it would be reasonable to assume that the… The post Crypto experts fiercely against possible exclusion of Bitcoin treasuries from MSCI indexes appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto professionals are opposed to a possible move to exclude Bitcoin treasuries from MSCI indexes, arguing that such a move could cut investors off from a lucrative market niche. The MSCI is mulling excluding DATs that have invested over 50% of their assets in Bitcoin or other crypto, claiming they are more investment funds than operating firms. However, the idea has not only drawn fierce backlash from the industry but also from industry leaders such as Michael Saylor of Strategy and Viek Ramaswamy of Strive Asset Management. The MSCI announced its possible exclusion plans in October, with a final decision expected to be reached at the beginning of next year.  Meanwhile, players in the crypto market emphasize that the MSCI’s exclusion of DATs from its indexes is a mistake. Adam Levine, Fireblocks’ CEO, said the MSCI plan might backfire and will likely not play well with institutional investors. He noted that these institutional investors have already warmed up to crypto in recent years and may be forced to rebalance their holdings to track the index.  Levine claims businesses could miss out on tokenized equity The Fireblocks CEO pointed out that the MSCI is introducing the risk of missing key market players if it leaves out companies that have a meaningful presence in the crypto space. He further compared it to the equivalence of intentionally ignoring early internet companies 30 years ago, especially now that businesses are innovating with tokenized equity and stablecoins.   Meanwhile, Spencer Hallarn, the head of OTC trading at GSR, said the decisions by the MSCI and other index providers to exclude DATs have real implications on the broader industry, and by extension, the crypto they hold. He, however, believes that the rumored exclusion has been well planned for, so it would be reasonable to assume that the…

Crypto experts fiercely against possible exclusion of Bitcoin treasuries from MSCI indexes

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Crypto professionals are opposed to a possible move to exclude Bitcoin treasuries from MSCI indexes, arguing that such a move could cut investors off from a lucrative market niche.

The MSCI is mulling excluding DATs that have invested over 50% of their assets in Bitcoin or other crypto, claiming they are more investment funds than operating firms.

However, the idea has not only drawn fierce backlash from the industry but also from industry leaders such as Michael Saylor of Strategy and Viek Ramaswamy of Strive Asset Management. The MSCI announced its possible exclusion plans in October, with a final decision expected to be reached at the beginning of next year. 

Meanwhile, players in the crypto market emphasize that the MSCI’s exclusion of DATs from its indexes is a mistake. Adam Levine, Fireblocks’ CEO, said the MSCI plan might backfire and will likely not play well with institutional investors. He noted that these institutional investors have already warmed up to crypto in recent years and may be forced to rebalance their holdings to track the index. 

Levine claims businesses could miss out on tokenized equity

The Fireblocks CEO pointed out that the MSCI is introducing the risk of missing key market players if it leaves out companies that have a meaningful presence in the crypto space. He further compared it to the equivalence of intentionally ignoring early internet companies 30 years ago, especially now that businesses are innovating with tokenized equity and stablecoins.  

Meanwhile, Spencer Hallarn, the head of OTC trading at GSR, said the decisions by the MSCI and other index providers to exclude DATs have real implications on the broader industry, and by extension, the crypto they hold. He, however, believes that the rumored exclusion has been well planned for, so it would be reasonable to assume that the market has already priced it in. It is unlikely to come as a surprise, he added. 

The Business Insider also predicts that the MSCI’s potential exclusion of DATs has already been factored into the market’s outlook despite the likely adverse implications for DATs. Meanwhile, Wojciech Kaszycki, BTCS S.A.’s chief strategy officer, predicts that Bitcoin can still recover from the bear market and the rebound is definitely coming. 

Strive urges MSCI to scrap exclusion plans

Nasdaq-listed Strive Asset Management is among the many crypto-related firms urging the MSCI to scrap its potential exclusion plans. The company emphasizes that cutting off BTC-focused DATs is unfair because they are crucial to structured finance and AI infrastructure. The MSCI’s chairman and CEO, Henry Fernandez, believes that the exclusion risks shutting down passive investors from a fast-growing market. 

Meanwhile, JPMorgan cautions that Strategy stands to lose nearly $2.8 billion if the MSCI index decides to exclude such Bitcoin treasuries. Strategy’s Saylor has confirmed that talks with MSCI are ongoing, as the company remains opposed to the move. 

Strive’s CEO, Matt Cole, also argues that the proposed exclusion misunderstands the role played by large Bitcoin firms in emerging industries, particularly in the field of AI. However, he notes that potential exclusion targets, such as MARA, Riot Platforms, and Hut 8, are expanding into AI by repurposing data centers for high-intensity compute workloads. 

On the other hand, Cole further noted that these companies will continue holding substantial Bitcoin reserves amid increasing AI revenue. He points out that the MSCI’s exclusion would permanently isolate a sector of the crypto industry that sits at the intersection of the next generation of computing and crypto.  

Strive further challenged the practicality of the MSCI’s exclusion threshold of 50% or more, highlighting the Trump Media & Technology Group as an example. The Trump-backed company narrowly avoided the initial MSCI exclusion because its BTC exposure is currently below the cutoff. 

Meanwhile, Strive suggests a parallel version of MSCI’s index for ex-DATs, rather than a blanket rule. The company says this will allow asset managers to avoid crypto-heavy firms as they await the MSCI’s final decision.

Want your project in front of crypto’s top minds? Feature it in our next industry report, where data meets impact.

Source: https://www.cryptopolitan.com/crypto-against-msci-indexes-exclusion/

Market Opportunity
Movement Logo
Movement Price(MOVE)
$0.01084
$0.01084$0.01084
-0.73%
USD
Movement (MOVE) Live Price Chart

World Cup Combo: Aim for 200x

World Cup Combo: Aim for 200xWorld Cup Combo: Aim for 200x

Combine up to 20 World Cup matches in one order

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Not a loophole: Singapore AI export controls let China tap US AI legally

Not a loophole: Singapore AI export controls let China tap US AI legally

American AI technology is reaching Chinese tech giants through a route that US export controls were never designed to close: Singapore. The city-state sits outside
Share
The Cryptonomist2026/07/10 14:46
CME Group to launch Solana and XRP futures options in October

CME Group to launch Solana and XRP futures options in October

The post CME Group to launch Solana and XRP futures options in October appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. CME Group is preparing to launch options on SOL and XRP futures next month, giving traders new ways to manage exposure to the two assets.  The contracts are set to go live on October 13, pending regulatory approval, and will come in both standard and micro sizes with expiries offered daily, monthly and quarterly. The new listings mark a major step for CME, which first brought bitcoin futures to market in 2017 and added ether contracts in 2021. Solana and XRP futures have quickly gained traction since their debut earlier this year. CME says more than 540,000 Solana contracts (worth about $22.3 billion), and 370,000 XRP contracts (worth $16.2 billion), have already been traded. Both products hit record trading activity and open interest in August. Market makers including Cumberland and FalconX plan to support the new contracts, arguing that institutional investors want hedging tools beyond bitcoin and ether. CME’s move also highlights the growing demand for regulated ways to access a broader set of digital assets. The launch, which still needs the green light from regulators, follows the end of XRP’s years-long legal fight with the US Securities and Exchange Commission. A federal court ruling in 2023 found that institutional sales of XRP violated securities laws, but programmatic exchange sales did not. The case officially closed in August 2025 after Ripple agreed to pay a $125 million fine, removing one of the biggest uncertainties hanging over the token. This is a developing story. This article was generated with the assistance of AI and reviewed by editor Jeffrey Albus before publication. Get the news in your inbox. Explore Blockworks newsletters: Source: https://blockworks.co/news/cme-group-solana-xrp-futures
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/17 23:55
Iran’s army chief warns of ‘total destruction’ for ground invasion

Iran’s army chief warns of ‘total destruction’ for ground invasion

The post Iran’s army chief warns of ‘total destruction’ for ground invasion appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Iran’s army chief warned of “total destruction”
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/04/02 18:15

Activate to Enjoy Special Perks

Activate to Enjoy Special PerksActivate to Enjoy Special Perks

Access 0 fees, premium support, and loss coverage.