TLDR JPMorgan warned that Strategy may be removed from the MSCI indices on January 15. The removal could lead to passive outflows of up to $2.8 billion. An additional $8.8 billion in exposure remains if other index providers follow suit. Strategy’s stock has already dropped to levels seen during the pandemic. JPMorgan stated that losing [...] The post JPMorgan Flags $2.8B Risk as MSCI May Drop Strategy from Indices appeared first on Blockonomi.TLDR JPMorgan warned that Strategy may be removed from the MSCI indices on January 15. The removal could lead to passive outflows of up to $2.8 billion. An additional $8.8 billion in exposure remains if other index providers follow suit. Strategy’s stock has already dropped to levels seen during the pandemic. JPMorgan stated that losing [...] The post JPMorgan Flags $2.8B Risk as MSCI May Drop Strategy from Indices appeared first on Blockonomi.

JPMorgan Flags $2.8B Risk as MSCI May Drop Strategy from Indices

2025/11/21 05:26
4 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

TLDR

  • JPMorgan warned that Strategy may be removed from the MSCI indices on January 15.
  • The removal could lead to passive outflows of up to $2.8 billion.
  • An additional $8.8 billion in exposure remains if other index providers follow suit.
  • Strategy’s stock has already dropped to levels seen during the pandemic.
  • JPMorgan stated that losing index status could hurt liquidity and reputation.

JPMorgan has warned that Strategy (MSTR) may be ejected from the MSCI indices following the January 15 review. This could cause nearly $2.8 billion in passive outflows and affect an additional $8.8 billion. The firm’s exposure to Bitcoin and its structure could push it out of key benchmarks, according to JPMorgan.

MSCI Decision Could Lead to $2.8 Billion in Passive Outflows

JPMorgan analysts said Strategy could lose its place in the MSCI World and MSCI USA indices next year. They stated that the stock’s current classification and exposure to Bitcoin could influence the ruling. The analysts estimate this removal could drive passive outflows of up to $2.8 billion.

They added that another $8.8 billion in exposure would remain if other index providers follow MSCI’s lead. Passive funds that track these benchmarks may be forced to exit their positions. JPMorgan stated this would cause significant shifts in institutional exposure to Strategy.

“Strategy’s presence in indexes let Bitcoin reach traditional portfolios indirectly,” said JPMorgan analyst Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou. He added that this dynamic could change rapidly if MSCI removes the stock from its indices. The current market response reflects that possibility.

Index Removal May Affect Stock Liquidity and Reputation

JPMorgan believes that being dropped from MSCI indices could lower Strategy’s market liquidity. It might also hurt the stock’s appeal to institutional clients. Analysts said this could raise new concerns about the company’s ability to raise equity capital.

The firm currently holds over $9 billion in passive inflows through ETFs and index funds. JPMorgan noted that losing index exposure could also affect pricing efficiency and valuation support. “These effects usually materialize fast in modern passive-heavy markets,” the analysts said.

Strategy’s stock value has already dropped to levels last seen during the pandemic. Market participants appear to be reacting to the potential index reclassification. JPMorgan highlighted this as a reflection of sentiment tied to benchmark inclusion.

JPMorgan Says Strategy Resembles an ETF

The S&P 500 committee excluded Strategy from its latest update, citing structure and earnings issues. Robinhood, AppLovin, and Emcor were added instead. JPMorgan said Strategy’s profile resembles an ETF more than a company with recurring profits.

Benchmark analyst Mark Palmer said the company likely missed the cut due to earnings volatility. “The committee may want more clean quarters before considering inclusion,” he said. JPMorgan supported this view in its own notes.

Strategy Chairman Michael Saylor said he did not expect an immediate S&P 500 inclusion. “We’re a new concept making believers every quarter,” he said. Saylor remains confident about the firm’s long-term trajectory.

Strategy holds more than 638,000 BTC, currently worth around $72 billion. This amounts to about 3% of the total Bitcoin supply. JPMorgan said this makes the firm more of a financial entity than a software company.

S&P Dow Jones still classifies Strategy as a software firm under GICS. JPMorgan said this legacy classification affects index decisions. The analysts noted this mismatch may delay broader index inclusion.

The company’s market capitalization stands at $94 billion. JPMorgan said most of this valuation now relies on Bitcoin. Its Bitcoin holdings remain the largest among public companies globally.

MSCI Adds and Removes Dozens of Stocks Across Index Families

MSCI has added 69 securities and deleted 64 from the MSCI ACWI Index. JPMorgan said Strategy’s name was absent from both lists. This implies that further review may determine its status in the upcoming update.

Nebius Group A, CoreWeave, and Insmed are the three most significant additions to the MSCI World Index. GF Securities, Barito Renewable Energy, and Zijin Gold International are joining the Emerging Markets Index.

The MSCI ACWI Small Cap Index saw 207 additions and 224 deletions. JPMorgan noted that Strategy did not appear in these changes either.

MSCI’s next index review and rebalance will take effect on January 15, 2025. JPMorgan expects that the Strategy’s position will be finalized during that round. Index fund managers are preparing for potential rebalancing actions.

The post JPMorgan Flags $2.8B Risk as MSCI May Drop Strategy from Indices appeared first on Blockonomi.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Gold continues to hit new highs. How to invest in gold in the crypto market?

Gold continues to hit new highs. How to invest in gold in the crypto market?

As Bitcoin encounters a "value winter", real-world gold is recasting the iron curtain of value on the blockchain.
Share
PANews2025/04/14 17:12
XRP Multi-Year Accumulation Signals Potential 1000% Breakout

XRP Multi-Year Accumulation Signals Potential 1000% Breakout

The post XRP Multi-Year Accumulation Signals Potential 1000% Breakout appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. XRP Builds Multi-Year Base as Whales Accumulate and Volume
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/21 00:04