As of September 10, 2025, over 1 million BTC – equivalent to approximately $110 billion Financial Times – are parked in the so-called Digital Asset Treasuries (DAT), a record level that, along with improving macro liquidity and clearer regulatory signals, positions Bitcoin strongly at the start of the 4th quarter.
According to data aggregated by our editorial team, based on corporate filings and official communications as of 09/10/2025, over 1M BTC are held by DAT.
Direct verifications reveal that this figure is equivalent to just over 5% of the circulating supply of Bitcoin in September 2025, a fact that confirms the systemic relevance of these vehicles. Market analysts consulted also note that the concentration in DAT has increased compared to 2024, strengthening the “sticky” component of demand.
DAT refers to corporate vehicles, listed funds, and company balance sheets that hold crypto-assets as part of the treasury. The current “PvP” (player-vs-player) phase describes a market where execution, governance, and cost of capital become distinguishing factors. In this context, investor selectivity increases.
Chart 1 — DAT Reserves per asset (BTC, ETH, SOL) in 2025. Source: aggregation of corporate filings and official communications.
The central outlook for crypto markets remains constructive at the start of the 4th quarter, supported by cooling inflation and rates that might decrease, favoring the search for yield and appetite for risky assets.
That said, attention remains focused on the FOMC meetings expected on September 17, 2025, and October 29, 2025, where guidance and dot plot could provide indications on the timing and extent of cuts Bitcoin down after the FOMC rally, but the probability of returning to $100,000 increases.
A crucial technical factor is the growing institutional demand coming from the DATs, which are distinguished by increasingly disciplined allocation criteria. As of September 10, 2025, the DATs boast:
These numbers indicate a structural demand that acts as a floor for the price during phases of volatility, accelerating movements in conjunction with an improvement in macro liquidity. In fact, the combined effect of stable flows and more relaxed financial conditions acts as a catalyst.
Bitcoin benefits from numerous favorable macro factors: its scarcity profile, market depth, and the improvement of microstructure (in terms of spot and derivatives flows) are elements that play to its advantage. It should be noted that the “programmatic” demand component further consolidates the thesis.
The expected outcome is an outperformance of Bitcoin during risk-on phases, with the possibility of new highs in the second half of 2025, given favorable macroeconomic conditions.
The narrative of Bitcoin’s “September weakness” has been repeated on several occasions, but data analysis suggests caution in relying solely on seasonality as a decision-making driver. In other words, seasonality alone provides weak signals.
The operational reading indicates that seasonality, in isolation, is not a reliable predictor; it is preferable to integrate it with macro variables, flows, and market positioning. That said, the combined framework offers greater robustness.
Chart 2 — Historical seasonality of Bitcoin’s monthly returns. Source: analysis based on market data (dataset and code to be attached in a public repository).
The growth of DATs has attracted increased regulatory scrutiny. In the USA, market practices and exchange requirements are steering towards greater disclosures in operations involving digital assets.
Although Nasdaq has not introduced formal rules specifically dedicated to DATs, the guidelines required for enhanced due diligence and, in some cases, the need to obtain shareholder approvals are driving the market. In this sense, transparency expectations are rising Michael Saylor continues to purchase BTC: post on X.
In essence, a more rigorous selection of issuers and vehicles could reduce informational asymmetries and idiosyncratic volatility.
In the PvP phase, capital tends to concentrate on assets and vehicles that guarantee greater liquidity and transparency.
One can expect a convergence on large caps (such as BTC and ETH) during macro uncertainty cycles, M&A operations, and partnerships among smaller players aimed at cost and distribution optimization, and the exit from the market of those vehicles with fragile governance or unsustainable economic models. Yet, the competitive balance could remain dynamic Bitcoin in national reserve: Ukraine’s ambitious project.
The outlook for the short term appears positive: structural demand from the DAT, potential easing of rates, and a more defined regulatory framework support the hypothesis of Bitcoin’s outperformance in the 4th quarter of 2025.
It remains essential to monitor data related to inflation, energy, and flows from listed instruments to confirm this trajectory. Ultimately, the combination of top-down factors and dedicated flows is the point to follow.


