Richard Teng is the CEO of Binance. Illustration: Osato Avan-Nomayo. Credit: Shutterstock.Richard Teng is the CEO of Binance. Illustration: Osato Avan-Nomayo. Credit: Shutterstock.

Binance files defamation lawsuit against Wall Street Journal, demands jury trial

2026/03/12 00:10
4 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Binance is raising the temperature over a slew of negative reports on its compliance practices — even as more keep pouring in.

The crypto industry’s largest exchange filed a defamation lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal on Wednesday over the newspaper’s reporting in February that Binance fired employees after they uncovered $1.7 billion in crypto tied to sanctioned entities had flowed through the platform.

The lawsuit seen by DL News alleges that the Wall Street Journal planned its reports with “hatred” and “ill will,” and that the outlet rushed out a “clickbait” version of the story to beat competing news outlets.

Binance is pressing for a jury trial to decide the case.

Dow Jones, the Wall Street Journal’s parent company, did not immediately respond to comment.

In February, the Wall Street Journal and a host of other media outlets, including Fortune and The New York Times, published stories about how Binance fired compliance staff who flagged $1 billion in crypto was flowing through the exchange to sanctioned entities with ties to Iran.

Those entities allegedly included the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and the Houthis.

A Binance spokesperson told DL News that the company had not filed similar lawsuits against Fortune or The New York Times. They declined to clarify why.

Binance has denied the version of events laid out in those reports.

Meanwhile, the Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday that the Department of Justice is investigating Iran’s use of Binance to evade sanctions.

“We are not aware of any investigations,” a Binance spokesperson told DL News. “As always, we are collaborating with regulators and law enforcement to investigate the facts.”

Heart of the matter

Ongoing reports of sanctioned entities allegedly turning to Binance to move money cuts at the heart of the crypto exchange’s $4.3 billion settlement in 2023.

The company’s then-CEO, Changpeng Zhao, pleaded guilty to failing to implement adequate anti-money-laundering and anti-terrorist-financing safeguards on the exchange. As part of a plea deal, Zhao stepped down as CEO and spent four months in prison in 2024.

Binance also agreed to oversight from two independent monitors to review its compliance practices.

New reports this year, however, paint a picture of a company that continues to struggle to fend off sanctioned entities.

Citing reporting by the Wall Street Journal, Fortune and the New York Times, Connecticut Senator Richard Blumenthal, the ranking member of the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, slammed Binance in February.

“Binance is a repeat offender,” he said, formally opening a US Senate investigation into the company.

“It has long been aware that the Iranian regime and its terrorist proxies use its cryptocurrency platform as a convenient and reliable means to bypass international sanctions, anti-money laundering controls, and other banking restrictions.”

Binance’s legal team said the reporting that Blumenthal’s inquiry relies on is “demonstrably false” and “defamatory in several material respects.”

A ‘hollow offer‘

Wednesday’s lawsuit alleges that despite reporting, Binance’s compliance team was never dismantled.

Instead, after uncovering ties to sanctioned entities, Binance removed these users from the platform.

The company’s compliance personnel were fired, rather for breaching the company’s data protection and confidentiality policies, the company claims.

The crypto exchange also alleges that the outlet set an unreasonable deadline for its response to a detailed list of 27 questions. And when Binance responded, the company claims the reporters disregarded it.

The Wall Street Journal‘s hollow offer to later correct or update the article with further comments or facts from Binance epitomises the Wall Street Journal’s ‘shoot first, ask questions later’ approach to the article,” the lawsuit reads.

Liam Kelly is DL News’ Berlin-based DeFi correspondent. Have a tip? Get in touch at liam@dlnews.com.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Stephen Gregory named binance us ceo as exchange targets expansion in US crypto market

Stephen Gregory named binance us ceo as exchange targets expansion in US crypto market

Binance.US names Stephen Gregory as binance us ceo, signaling expansion in the US crypto market with a renewed focus on compliance.
Share
The Cryptonomist2026/03/12 20:09
The Growing World of Medical Aesthetics: Enhancing Beauty Through Science and Innovation

The Growing World of Medical Aesthetics: Enhancing Beauty Through Science and Innovation

In recent years, the field of medical aesthetics has grown rapidly as more individuals seek safe and effective ways to enhance their appearance and improve their
Share
Techbullion2026/03/12 23:21