Explains Culper Research's bear case on ether after the Fusaka upgrade, showing why post-upgrade tokenomics could drive a short ethereum bet.Explains Culper Research's bear case on ether after the Fusaka upgrade, showing why post-upgrade tokenomics could drive a short ethereum bet.

Why funds short Ethereum as Culper Research targets ETH after Fusaka upgrade

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com
short ethereum

Markets are debating whether to short Ethereum after a US research firm publicly attacked the network’s post-upgrade economics and recent selling by Vitalik Buterin.

Culper Research reveals bearish ether bet

On Thursday, Culper Research disclosed a short position in ether and ETH-linked securities, arguing that Ethereum’s latest design changes will pressure the token for an extended period. The firm said the December 2025 Fusaka upgrade and Vitalik Buterin‘s recent on-chain activity both indicate that “ETH is going lower.”

“NEW: We are short Ether ETH, and ETH-linked securities, incl. BMNR,” Culper wrote on X. However, it emphasized that the call is grounded in tokenomics, not just price action. “We think ETH tokenomics are impaired following the December 2025 Fusaka upgrade. Vitalik knows it and is selling, while ETH’s most ardent bull, Tom Lee, is throwing good money after bad.”

How Culper interprets Ethereum’s Fusaka upgrade

Culper’s central argument is that Fusaka’s L1 scaling overhaul has reshaped Ethereum’s fee and demand mechanics far more aggressively than core developers anticipated. The report points to a gas limit increase “45 to 60M” intended to scale the base layer and to internal estimates that “Vitalik and PTG” expected transaction fees to drop roughly 10% to 30%.

According to Culper, the realized outcome was far more extreme. “In reality, gas fees fell ~90%,” the firm wrote, claiming Ethereum’s leadership and validators “miscalculated L1 demand elasticity by 3-9x based on outdated math (pre-EIP-1559 and pre-L2s).” Moreover, the group suggests this error is structural rather than a short-term market aberration.

That fee compression matters because it flows directly into validator revenue and staking incentives. “Further, the gas-limit increase killed $ETH validators, who are now seeing 40-50% lower tips per gas,” Culper argued. The firm contends weaker yields discourage staking and “high-value activity,” which in turn undermines Ethereum’s long-running institutional adoption narrative. “The flywheel is now running in reverse.”

Challenging Tom Lee’s bullish thesis

The thread then positions Tom Lee and BMNR as the main high-profile bulls on ETH, before attempting to dismantle their post-Fusaka optimism. Culper says Lee has defended ether by arguing that “ETH is not in a death spiral because utility is going up.” According to the research firm, Lee cited spikes in active addresses and transaction volumes after the December 2025 upgrade as evidence of “strengthening fundamentals” and institutional demand.

Culper’s rebuttal is highly pointed and leans on Lee’s own framing. “By Lee’s own logic, if ETH activity does NOT reflect increased utility and strengthening fundamentals, then $ETH would be in a death spiral,” the post stated. “Our research says this is exactly what’s happening.” That said, the firm stresses that the dispute is less about raw activity counts and more about what is actually driving those metrics.

On-chain data and the rise of low-value activity

To explain the sudden activity surge, Culper points to its analysis of Ethereum on-chain data from January 2025 through February 2026. The research claims that much of the post-Fusaka growth did not come from organic usage, but from a wave of low-value address poisoning and wallet dusting made economical by cheaper blockspace.

“Post-Fusaka: 95% of growth in new wallets is explained by newly-created ‘dusting’ wallets,” Culper wrote. The firm adds that poisoning attacks have “more than 3x’ed,” that such activity explains “>50% of $ETH transaction growth,” and that it now makes up “22.5% of all ETH transactions.” However, critics might argue that even low-value traffic still reflects broader experimentation with the network.

Culper also said it tested the phenomenon directly. The team claims it created two new wallets, transferred funds between them, and was targeted by poisoning attacks “within 5 minutes.” It further asserts that realized poisoning losses are “already pacing >8x higher than pre-Fusaka,” presenting this as another hidden cost of the upgrade’s aggressive L1 scaling.

Vitalik Buterin’s ETH sales under the microscope

The short thesis then links these tokenomics concerns to Vitalik Buterin‘s recent sales, framing his moves as informed decision-making rather than routine treasury management. Culper suggests that Buterin’s activity reinforces the research view that ETH economics have worsened since December 2025.

“This is why, we think, Vitalik is selling ETH hand over fist,” the group wrote. “On January 30, Vitalik pre-announced he’d sell 16,384 ETH to fund the Foundation’s ‘austerity period.’ Since then, he’s sold over 19,300 ETH and counting.” Moreover, Culper concludes that “He knows what Tom Lee doesn’t: ETH tokenomics are broken.” For traders wondering how to execute a short Ethereum trade, this messaging clearly aims to signal insider alignment with the bearish case.

Competition from Solana and Ethereum’s own L2s

Culper closes its argument by reframing ether’s situation as a market share problem rather than a pure valuation dispute. The firm says Ethereum is losing ground both to Solana at the base layer and to its own L2 networks, which increasingly capture user activity and fee revenue. That comparison echoes earlier tech cycles where incumbents led one era, then ceded dominance to faster-moving challengers.

According to the research, the combination of cheaper L1 blockspace, lower validator yields and the migration of activity to alternative chains weakens ETH’s long-term investment profile. However, supporters counter that rollups and L2s were always part of the roadmap, and that near-term fee compression could pave the way for broader adoption.

At press time, ETH traded at $2,080, leaving both bulls and bears focused on whether post-Fusaka economics and Buterin’s sales will justify Culper’s high-conviction short.

In summary, Culper Research’s campaign combines concerns over the December 2025 Fusaka upgrade, rising low-value on-chain activity, sliding validator economics, and Vitalik Buterin’s recent sales to build a comprehensive bear case on ether.

Market Opportunity
Ethereum Logo
Ethereum Price(ETH)
$2,140.48
$2,140.48$2,140.48
+1.02%
USD
Ethereum (ETH) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Trump-backed WLFI  launches AgentPay SDK open-source payment toolkit for AI agents

Trump-backed WLFI  launches AgentPay SDK open-source payment toolkit for AI agents

The Trump family has expanded its presence in the crypto community with a major development for artificial intelligence (AI) agents. According to reports, World
Share
Cryptopolitan2026/03/20 19:03
Summarize Any Stock’s Earnings Call in Seconds Using FMP API

Summarize Any Stock’s Earnings Call in Seconds Using FMP API

Turn lengthy earnings call transcripts into one-page insights using the Financial Modeling Prep APIPhoto by Bich Tran Earnings calls are packed with insights. They tell you how a company performed, what management expects in the future, and what analysts are worried about. The challenge is that these transcripts often stretch across dozens of pages, making it tough to separate the key takeaways from the noise. With the right tools, you don’t need to spend hours reading every line. By combining the Financial Modeling Prep (FMP) API with Groq’s lightning-fast LLMs, you can transform any earnings call into a concise summary in seconds. The FMP API provides reliable access to complete transcripts, while Groq handles the heavy lifting of distilling them into clear, actionable highlights. In this article, we’ll build a Python workflow that brings these two together. You’ll see how to fetch transcripts for any stock, prepare the text, and instantly generate a one-page summary. Whether you’re tracking Apple, NVIDIA, or your favorite growth stock, the process works the same — fast, accurate, and ready whenever you are. Fetching Earnings Transcripts with FMP API The first step is to pull the raw transcript data. FMP makes this simple with dedicated endpoints for earnings calls. If you want the latest transcripts across the market, you can use the stable endpoint /stable/earning-call-transcript-latest. For a specific stock, the v3 endpoint lets you request transcripts by symbol, quarter, and year using the pattern: https://financialmodelingprep.com/api/v3/earning_call_transcript/{symbol}?quarter={q}&year={y}&apikey=YOUR_API_KEY here’s how you can fetch NVIDIA’s transcript for a given quarter: import requestsAPI_KEY = "your_api_key"symbol = "NVDA"quarter = 2year = 2024url = f"https://financialmodelingprep.com/api/v3/earning_call_transcript/{symbol}?quarter={quarter}&year={year}&apikey={API_KEY}"response = requests.get(url)data = response.json()# Inspect the keysprint(data.keys())# Access transcript contentif "content" in data[0]: transcript_text = data[0]["content"] print(transcript_text[:500]) # preview first 500 characters The response typically includes details like the company symbol, quarter, year, and the full transcript text. If you aren’t sure which quarter to query, the “latest transcripts” endpoint is the quickest way to always stay up to date. Cleaning and Preparing Transcript Data Raw transcripts from the API often include long paragraphs, speaker tags, and formatting artifacts. Before sending them to an LLM, it helps to organize the text into a cleaner structure. Most transcripts follow a pattern: prepared remarks from executives first, followed by a Q&A session with analysts. Separating these sections gives better control when prompting the model. In Python, you can parse the transcript and strip out unnecessary characters. A simple way is to split by markers such as “Operator” or “Question-and-Answer.” Once separated, you can create two blocks — Prepared Remarks and Q&A — that will later be summarized independently. This ensures the model handles each section within context and avoids missing important details. Here’s a small example of how you might start preparing the data: import re# Example: using the transcript_text we fetched earliertext = transcript_text# Remove extra spaces and line breaksclean_text = re.sub(r'\s+', ' ', text).strip()# Split sections (this is a heuristic; real-world transcripts vary slightly)if "Question-and-Answer" in clean_text: prepared, qna = clean_text.split("Question-and-Answer", 1)else: prepared, qna = clean_text, ""print("Prepared Remarks Preview:\n", prepared[:500])print("\nQ&A Preview:\n", qna[:500]) With the transcript cleaned and divided, you’re ready to feed it into Groq’s LLM. Chunking may be necessary if the text is very long. A good approach is to break it into segments of a few thousand tokens, summarize each part, and then merge the summaries in a final pass. Summarizing with Groq LLM Now that the transcript is clean and split into Prepared Remarks and Q&A, we’ll use Groq to generate a crisp one-pager. The idea is simple: summarize each section separately (for focus and accuracy), then synthesize a final brief. Prompt design (concise and factual) Use a short, repeatable template that pushes for neutral, investor-ready language: You are an equity research analyst. Summarize the following earnings call sectionfor {symbol} ({quarter} {year}). Be factual and concise.Return:1) TL;DR (3–5 bullets)2) Results vs. guidance (what improved/worsened)3) Forward outlook (specific statements)4) Risks / watch-outs5) Q&A takeaways (if present)Text:<<<{section_text}>>> Python: calling Groq and getting a clean summary Groq provides an OpenAI-compatible API. Set your GROQ_API_KEY and pick a fast, high-quality model (e.g., a Llama-3.1 70B variant). We’ll write a helper to summarize any text block, then run it for both sections and merge. import osimport textwrapimport requestsGROQ_API_KEY = os.environ.get("GROQ_API_KEY") or "your_groq_api_key"GROQ_BASE_URL = "https://api.groq.com/openai/v1" # OpenAI-compatibleMODEL = "llama-3.1-70b" # choose your preferred Groq modeldef call_groq(prompt, temperature=0.2, max_tokens=1200): url = f"{GROQ_BASE_URL}/chat/completions" headers = { "Authorization": f"Bearer {GROQ_API_KEY}", "Content-Type": "application/json", } payload = { "model": MODEL, "messages": [ {"role": "system", "content": "You are a precise, neutral equity research analyst."}, {"role": "user", "content": prompt}, ], "temperature": temperature, "max_tokens": max_tokens, } r = requests.post(url, headers=headers, json=payload, timeout=60) r.raise_for_status() return r.json()["choices"][0]["message"]["content"].strip()def build_prompt(section_text, symbol, quarter, year): template = """ You are an equity research analyst. Summarize the following earnings call section for {symbol} ({quarter} {year}). Be factual and concise. Return: 1) TL;DR (3–5 bullets) 2) Results vs. guidance (what improved/worsened) 3) Forward outlook (specific statements) 4) Risks / watch-outs 5) Q&A takeaways (if present) Text: <<< {section_text} >>> """ return textwrap.dedent(template).format( symbol=symbol, quarter=quarter, year=year, section_text=section_text )def summarize_section(section_text, symbol="NVDA", quarter="Q2", year="2024"): if not section_text or section_text.strip() == "": return "(No content found for this section.)" prompt = build_prompt(section_text, symbol, quarter, year) return call_groq(prompt)# Example usage with the cleaned splits from Section 3prepared_summary = summarize_section(prepared, symbol="NVDA", quarter="Q2", year="2024")qna_summary = summarize_section(qna, symbol="NVDA", quarter="Q2", year="2024")final_one_pager = f"""# {symbol} Earnings One-Pager — {quarter} {year}## Prepared Remarks — Key Points{prepared_summary}## Q&A Highlights{qna_summary}""".strip()print(final_one_pager[:1200]) # preview Tips that keep quality high: Keep temperature low (≈0.2) for factual tone. If a section is extremely long, chunk at ~5–8k tokens, summarize each chunk with the same prompt, then ask the model to merge chunk summaries into one section summary before producing the final one-pager. If you also fetched headline numbers (EPS/revenue, guidance) earlier, prepend them to the prompt as brief context to help the model anchor on the right outcomes. Building the End-to-End Pipeline At this point, we have all the building blocks: the FMP API to fetch transcripts, a cleaning step to structure the data, and Groq LLM to generate concise summaries. The final step is to connect everything into a single workflow that can take any ticker and return a one-page earnings call summary. The flow looks like this: Input a stock ticker (for example, NVDA). Use FMP to fetch the latest transcript. Clean and split the text into Prepared Remarks and Q&A. Send each section to Groq for summarization. Merge the outputs into a neatly formatted earnings one-pager. Here’s how it comes together in Python: def summarize_earnings_call(symbol, quarter, year, api_key, groq_key): # Step 1: Fetch transcript from FMP url = f"https://financialmodelingprep.com/api/v3/earning_call_transcript/{symbol}?quarter={quarter}&year={year}&apikey={api_key}" resp = requests.get(url) resp.raise_for_status() data = resp.json() if not data or "content" not in data[0]: return f"No transcript found for {symbol} {quarter} {year}" text = data[0]["content"] # Step 2: Clean and split clean_text = re.sub(r'\s+', ' ', text).strip() if "Question-and-Answer" in clean_text: prepared, qna = clean_text.split("Question-and-Answer", 1) else: prepared, qna = clean_text, "" # Step 3: Summarize with Groq prepared_summary = summarize_section(prepared, symbol, quarter, year) qna_summary = summarize_section(qna, symbol, quarter, year) # Step 4: Merge into final one-pager return f"""# {symbol} Earnings One-Pager — {quarter} {year}## Prepared Remarks{prepared_summary}## Q&A Highlights{qna_summary}""".strip()# Example runprint(summarize_earnings_call("NVDA", 2, 2024, API_KEY, GROQ_API_KEY)) With this setup, generating a summary becomes as simple as calling one function with a ticker and date. You can run it inside a notebook, integrate it into a research workflow, or even schedule it to trigger after each new earnings release. Free Stock Market API and Financial Statements API... Conclusion Earnings calls no longer need to feel overwhelming. With the Financial Modeling Prep API, you can instantly access any company’s transcript, and with Groq LLM, you can turn that raw text into a sharp, actionable summary in seconds. This pipeline saves hours of reading and ensures you never miss the key results, guidance, or risks hidden in lengthy remarks. Whether you track tech giants like NVIDIA or smaller growth stocks, the process is the same — fast, reliable, and powered by the flexibility of FMP’s data. Summarize Any Stock’s Earnings Call in Seconds Using FMP API was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/09/18 14:40
Tom Lee Declares That Ethereum Has Bottomed Out

Tom Lee Declares That Ethereum Has Bottomed Out

Experienced analyst Tom Lee conducted an in-depth analysis of the Ethereum price. Here are some of the highlights from Lee's findings. Continue Reading: Tom Lee
Share
Bitcoinsistemi2026/03/20 19:05