The post Meta caught in storm of unauthorized creation of flirty chatbot of female celebs appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Meta has come under fire again, as recent findings published by Reuters show that its artificial intelligence tools enabled the creation of deepfake images and chatbots impersonating popular celebrities such as Taylor Swift, Scarlett Johansson, Anne Hathaway and Selena Gomez, without their consent. The investigation discovered that most of the bots were built by users through Meta’s AI chatbot platform. However, there were a few that were created internally by a Meta employee. Some of the Taylor Swift parody chatbot accounts insisted that they were the real singer, and oftentimes made flirtatious advances and encouraged meet-ups. Reports implicate Meta in flirty avatars scandal Reuters reported that several weeks of testing found that the celebrity chatbots, available across Meta’s Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp platforms, sometimes went far beyond playful conversation. Users prompted them to produce photorealistic images of stars in lingerie, posing in bathtubs, and even suggesting intimate encounters. One troubling discovery was the creation of a chatbot of Walker Scobell, a 16-year-old actor. When asked for a beach photo, the bot generated a lifelike image of the teenager shirtless with the caption, “Pretty cute, huh?” Meta is not alone in facing scrutiny. Elon Musk’s xAI has also come under criticism for enabling users to generate deepfake images of celebrities in underwear. Meta spokesman Andy Stone acknowledged the failures, saying the company’s tools should not have generated either intimate depictions of adult celebrities or any sexualized material involving minors. “Like others, we permit the generation of images containing public figures, but our policies are intended to prohibit nude, intimate or sexually suggestive imagery,” he told Reuters. He added that the lingerie depictions reflected failures in enforcing company policy. Meta’s rules prohibit “direct impersonation,” but the company argued that parody bots were permissible if labeled clearly. However, Reuters found that some avatars… The post Meta caught in storm of unauthorized creation of flirty chatbot of female celebs appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Meta has come under fire again, as recent findings published by Reuters show that its artificial intelligence tools enabled the creation of deepfake images and chatbots impersonating popular celebrities such as Taylor Swift, Scarlett Johansson, Anne Hathaway and Selena Gomez, without their consent. The investigation discovered that most of the bots were built by users through Meta’s AI chatbot platform. However, there were a few that were created internally by a Meta employee. Some of the Taylor Swift parody chatbot accounts insisted that they were the real singer, and oftentimes made flirtatious advances and encouraged meet-ups. Reports implicate Meta in flirty avatars scandal Reuters reported that several weeks of testing found that the celebrity chatbots, available across Meta’s Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp platforms, sometimes went far beyond playful conversation. Users prompted them to produce photorealistic images of stars in lingerie, posing in bathtubs, and even suggesting intimate encounters. One troubling discovery was the creation of a chatbot of Walker Scobell, a 16-year-old actor. When asked for a beach photo, the bot generated a lifelike image of the teenager shirtless with the caption, “Pretty cute, huh?” Meta is not alone in facing scrutiny. Elon Musk’s xAI has also come under criticism for enabling users to generate deepfake images of celebrities in underwear. Meta spokesman Andy Stone acknowledged the failures, saying the company’s tools should not have generated either intimate depictions of adult celebrities or any sexualized material involving minors. “Like others, we permit the generation of images containing public figures, but our policies are intended to prohibit nude, intimate or sexually suggestive imagery,” he told Reuters. He added that the lingerie depictions reflected failures in enforcing company policy. Meta’s rules prohibit “direct impersonation,” but the company argued that parody bots were permissible if labeled clearly. However, Reuters found that some avatars…

Meta caught in storm of unauthorized creation of flirty chatbot of female celebs

Meta has come under fire again, as recent findings published by Reuters show that its artificial intelligence tools enabled the creation of deepfake images and chatbots impersonating popular celebrities such as Taylor Swift, Scarlett Johansson, Anne Hathaway and Selena Gomez, without their consent.

The investigation discovered that most of the bots were built by users through Meta’s AI chatbot platform. However, there were a few that were created internally by a Meta employee.

Some of the Taylor Swift parody chatbot accounts insisted that they were the real singer, and oftentimes made flirtatious advances and encouraged meet-ups.

Reports implicate Meta in flirty avatars scandal

Reuters reported that several weeks of testing found that the celebrity chatbots, available across Meta’s Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp platforms, sometimes went far beyond playful conversation. Users prompted them to produce photorealistic images of stars in lingerie, posing in bathtubs, and even suggesting intimate encounters.

One troubling discovery was the creation of a chatbot of Walker Scobell, a 16-year-old actor. When asked for a beach photo, the bot generated a lifelike image of the teenager shirtless with the caption, “Pretty cute, huh?”

Meta is not alone in facing scrutiny. Elon Musk’s xAI has also come under criticism for enabling users to generate deepfake images of celebrities in underwear.

Meta spokesman Andy Stone acknowledged the failures, saying the company’s tools should not have generated either intimate depictions of adult celebrities or any sexualized material involving minors.

“Like others, we permit the generation of images containing public figures, but our policies are intended to prohibit nude, intimate or sexually suggestive imagery,” he told Reuters. He added that the lingerie depictions reflected failures in enforcing company policy.

Meta’s rules prohibit “direct impersonation,” but the company argued that parody bots were permissible if labeled clearly. However, Reuters found that some avatars carried no disclaimer. Meta deleted about a dozen of the bots, both parody and unlabeled, shortly before the Reuters report was published. The company declined to comment on the removals.

AI safety concerns could lead to regulatory pressure

Following the report, Meta said it would roll out new safeguards aimed at protecting teenagers, including restricting youth access to certain AI characters and retraining its models to reduce inappropriate themes.

California Attorney General Rob Bonta issued a warning to the sector, saying, “Exposing children to sexualized content is indefensible.”

In one tragic case earlier this month, a cognitively impaired 76-year-old man in New Jersey died after attempting to meet a Meta chatbot he believed to be a real woman. Critics say such cases highlight the dangers of deploying large-scale AI tools without adequate guardrails.

Legal experts warn that Meta could face significant challenges under existing intellectual property and publicity laws. Mark Lemley, a Stanford University law professor, said that California’s “right of publicity” statute prohibits the use of an individual’s name or likeness for commercial purposes without consent.

“That doesn’t seem to be true here,” he said, noting the bots simply replicated celebrities’ images rather than creating transformative works.

The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them.

Source: https://www.cryptopolitan.com/meta-flirty-chatbot-of-female-celebs/

Market Opportunity
RealLink Logo
RealLink Price(REAL)
$0.079
$0.079$0.079
-1.92%
USD
RealLink (REAL) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

X to cut off InfoFi crypto projects from accessing its API

X to cut off InfoFi crypto projects from accessing its API

X, the most widely used app for crypto projects, is changing its API access policy. InfoFi projects, which proliferated non-organic bot content, will be cut off
Share
Cryptopolitan2026/01/16 02:50
X Just Killed Kaito and InfoFi Crypto, Several Tokens Crash

X Just Killed Kaito and InfoFi Crypto, Several Tokens Crash

The post X Just Killed Kaito and InfoFi Crypto, Several Tokens Crash appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. X has revoked API access for apps that reward users for
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/16 03:42
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37