ETH ETFs have drawn steadier inflows even in volatile weeks, contrasting with BTC funds that have struggled with sizable outflows since July.ETH ETFs have drawn steadier inflows even in volatile weeks, contrasting with BTC funds that have struggled with sizable outflows since July.

6 Weeks Straight: Ethereum ETFs Leave Bitcoin in the Dust

Ethereum exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have outperformed their Bitcoin counterparts for six consecutive weeks, highlighting a shifting preference among investors.

Fresh data shows ETH products are drawing steadier inflows even as Bitcoin ETFs continue to command the lion’s share of assets under management.

Weekly Data Highlights Ethereum’s Edge

According to data from SoSoValue, as of August 27, cumulative inflows into U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs stood at $54.19 billion, with $144.57 billion in assets under management.

By contrast, Ethereum ETFs have drawn $13.64 billion in total inflows and now manage $30.17 billion, representing 5.44% of ETH’s market capitalization. However, while BTC funds remain far larger, Ethereum’s pace of accumulation has become quite notable.

Analysis by DefiLlama based on data from Farside Investors shows that spot ETH ETFs have posted stronger inflows than the BTC ones in six straight weeks, including periods of overall market turbulence.

You would have to go back to the July 14-20 window, when BTC ETFs were in the middle of a long inflow streak, to find the last time they topped Ethereum. In that week, the Bitcoin-based products saw $2.386 billion in net inflows against Ethereum’s $2.182 billion. Since then, it has all been downhill for the OG cryptocurrency.

Between July 21 and 27, Bitcoin ETFs saw just $72.3 million in inflows, while Ethereum ETFs brought in $1.84 billion. The trend deepened from July 28 to August 3, when BTC posted $642.9 million in outflows compared to ETH’s net gains of $154.3 million.

Even in weeks where both asset classes recorded losses, ETH still fared better. For example, between August 18 and 24, Bitcoin funds shed $1.179 billion, while only about $241 million worth of capital trickled out of Ethereum ETFs.

With still a few days left in the last week of August, ETH is again leading after raking in over $1.2 billion in inflows. Meanwhile, since Monday, their BTC counterparts have collectively managed a more modest $388.6 million.

Market Context

Looking closer, within the ETF ecosystem, BlackRock dominates both asset classes. Its IBIT product leads Bitcoin with $83.54 billion in net assets after a $50.87 million single-day inflow on August 27.

On the Ethereum side, the investment firm’s ETHA fund accounts for $17.19 billion in assets and added $262.63 million that same day, dwarfing activity from competitors such as Fidelity and Grayscale.

The story is also similar in the markets, with the two leading crypto assets moving in opposite directions. Bitcoin is trading at $112,967, down slightly by 0.4% on the week compared to ETH’s 7.5% pump in the same period.

BTC also lags in the monthly charts, dipping by 5%, while ETH went up by almost 19% in that time. In one year, ETH has advanced by 86%, which is broadly in line with Bitcoin. Furthermore, both assets recently hit new all-time highs, but have since dropped from their respective peaks by almost the same rate.

The post 6 Weeks Straight: Ethereum ETFs Leave Bitcoin in the Dust appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Market Opportunity
Bitcoin Logo
Bitcoin Price(BTC)
$95,428.43
$95,428.43$95,428.43
+0.89%
USD
Bitcoin (BTC) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

XRPL Validator Reveals Why He Just Vetoed New Amendment

XRPL Validator Reveals Why He Just Vetoed New Amendment

Vet has explained that he has decided to veto the Token Escrow amendment to prevent breaking things
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:28
Unleashing A New Era Of Seller Empowerment

Unleashing A New Era Of Seller Empowerment

The post Unleashing A New Era Of Seller Empowerment appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Amazon AI Agent: Unleashing A New Era Of Seller Empowerment Skip to content Home AI News Amazon AI Agent: Unleashing a New Era of Seller Empowerment Source: https://bitcoinworld.co.in/amazon-ai-seller-tools/
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:10
Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28