The post MIT-educated brothers contest use of Google searches in $25M crypto fraud case appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The two Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) graduates accused of stealing $25 million worth of crypto are trying to block federal prosecutors from adding Google search history in court as evidence. According to a motion filed in a Manhattan Federal court on Friday by Anton and James Peraire-Bueno, searches for “top crypto lawyers” and “wire fraud statute of limitations” are irrelevant and prejudicial to their case.  The searches were reportedly made when the brothers were in consultations with their attorneys after the alleged theft. Per the defense, this history “cannot demonstrate intent to commit fraud.” US District Judge Jessica G.L. Clarke will have to decide if the searches can be admissible in court. Search history is not evidence, defense attest According to federal prosecutors, the searches show consciousness of guilt from the defendants. But the Peraire-Bueno brothers insist they are just part of a prudent legal consultation during an ongoing investigation. Court documents show one search for “top crypto lawyers” occurred the same day the brothers first contacted their legal counsel. Per the two MIT grads’ attorneys, if prosecutors use the searches, it will undercut the government’s argument that they are guilty.  “For the government to argue its preferred inference, the government would first need to establish that any given search was connected to this case,” the filing stated. “But the contents of the searches themselves do not show that.” Alex Chandra, a partner at Indonesian-based IGNOS Law Alliance firm, said Google search histories can be used as hints, “but they’re context-dependent.”  “The mere fact that someone googled something isn’t automatic proof of intent or guilt,” he explained, adding that searches conducted before a crime can suggest planning. However, those made afterward are not really profound indicators of intent.  MIT brothers exploited Ethereum’s MEV, prosecution says According to a US… The post MIT-educated brothers contest use of Google searches in $25M crypto fraud case appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The two Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) graduates accused of stealing $25 million worth of crypto are trying to block federal prosecutors from adding Google search history in court as evidence. According to a motion filed in a Manhattan Federal court on Friday by Anton and James Peraire-Bueno, searches for “top crypto lawyers” and “wire fraud statute of limitations” are irrelevant and prejudicial to their case.  The searches were reportedly made when the brothers were in consultations with their attorneys after the alleged theft. Per the defense, this history “cannot demonstrate intent to commit fraud.” US District Judge Jessica G.L. Clarke will have to decide if the searches can be admissible in court. Search history is not evidence, defense attest According to federal prosecutors, the searches show consciousness of guilt from the defendants. But the Peraire-Bueno brothers insist they are just part of a prudent legal consultation during an ongoing investigation. Court documents show one search for “top crypto lawyers” occurred the same day the brothers first contacted their legal counsel. Per the two MIT grads’ attorneys, if prosecutors use the searches, it will undercut the government’s argument that they are guilty.  “For the government to argue its preferred inference, the government would first need to establish that any given search was connected to this case,” the filing stated. “But the contents of the searches themselves do not show that.” Alex Chandra, a partner at Indonesian-based IGNOS Law Alliance firm, said Google search histories can be used as hints, “but they’re context-dependent.”  “The mere fact that someone googled something isn’t automatic proof of intent or guilt,” he explained, adding that searches conducted before a crime can suggest planning. However, those made afterward are not really profound indicators of intent.  MIT brothers exploited Ethereum’s MEV, prosecution says According to a US…

MIT-educated brothers contest use of Google searches in $25M crypto fraud case

The two Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) graduates accused of stealing $25 million worth of crypto are trying to block federal prosecutors from adding Google search history in court as evidence.

According to a motion filed in a Manhattan Federal court on Friday by Anton and James Peraire-Bueno, searches for “top crypto lawyers” and “wire fraud statute of limitations” are irrelevant and prejudicial to their case. 

The searches were reportedly made when the brothers were in consultations with their attorneys after the alleged theft. Per the defense, this history “cannot demonstrate intent to commit fraud.” US District Judge Jessica G.L. Clarke will have to decide if the searches can be admissible in court.

Search history is not evidence, defense attest

According to federal prosecutors, the searches show consciousness of guilt from the defendants. But the Peraire-Bueno brothers insist they are just part of a prudent legal consultation during an ongoing investigation.

Court documents show one search for “top crypto lawyers” occurred the same day the brothers first contacted their legal counsel. Per the two MIT grads’ attorneys, if prosecutors use the searches, it will undercut the government’s argument that they are guilty. 

“For the government to argue its preferred inference, the government would first need to establish that any given search was connected to this case,” the filing stated. “But the contents of the searches themselves do not show that.”

Alex Chandra, a partner at Indonesian-based IGNOS Law Alliance firm, said Google search histories can be used as hints, “but they’re context-dependent.” 

“The mere fact that someone googled something isn’t automatic proof of intent or guilt,” he explained, adding that searches conducted before a crime can suggest planning. However, those made afterward are not really profound indicators of intent. 

MIT brothers exploited Ethereum’s MEV, prosecution says

According to a US Department of Justice statement on the case, the brothers are accused of exploiting Ethereum’s Maximal Extractible Value (MEV) boost system in April 2023. They allegedly intercepted private transactions and manipulated them to siphon $25 million in just 12 seconds.

“And once they put their plan into action, their heist only took 12 seconds to complete,” US Attorney Damian Williams mentioned in his press briefing.

Authorities say the brothers targeted Ethereum traders by altering pending transactions, allowing them to divert the crypto funds before the trades were finalized. Court filings further reveal that the pair retained legal counsel immediately after being contacted by anonymous “sandwich attackers” who demanded the return of the stolen funds.

Anton was detained in Boston, while James was booked in New York during their arrest in May last year. In the afternoon of their indictment, the former appeared before US Magistrate Judge Paul G. Levenson in Massachusetts. James faced US Magistrate Judge Valerie Figueredo in the Southern District of New York.

“As alleged in today’s indictment, the Peraire-Bueno brothers stole $25 million in Ethereum cryptocurrency through a technologically sophisticated, cutting-edge scheme they plotted for months and executed in seconds,” Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco told reporters at the time of their indictment.

Defense files other motions to scrap evidence

The Peraire-Bueno brothers also moved to exclude several other pieces of evidence. They asked the court to block prosecutors from introducing news articles that contain “inflammatory descriptions” of them as inadmissible hearsay.

Motion to exclude Twitter screenshot as evidence. Source: CourtListener.

Moreover, they sought to prevent the government from using a screenshot from X that allegedly shows a “false signature.” The screenshot was originally posted by pseudonymous Paradigm crypto researcher “Samczsun.” Defense attorneys are trying to convince the court that prosecutors cannot properly authenticate the image, and that they should admit it would be prejudicial.

If you’re reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter.

Source: https://www.cryptopolitan.com/brothers-google-searches-in-25m-crypto-fcase/

Market Opportunity
Gravity Logo
Gravity Price(G)
$0.003454
$0.003454$0.003454
+0.29%
USD
Gravity (G) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
MYX Finance price surges again as funding rate points to a crash

MYX Finance price surges again as funding rate points to a crash

MYX Finance price went parabolic again as the recent short-squeeze resumed. However, the formation of a double-top pattern and the funding rate point to an eventual crash in the coming days. MYX Finance (MYX) came in the spotlight earlier this…
Share
Crypto.news2025/09/18 02:57
Trump enlists GOP to translate his conspiracy theories into new action

Trump enlists GOP to translate his conspiracy theories into new action

President Donald Trump will deliver his "State of the Union" address on Tuesday and is expected to bring up some of his election conspiracies before calling on
Share
Alternet2026/02/25 04:52