The post Regulation encourages the separation of income and liquidity appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed here belong solely to the author and do not represent the views and opinions of crypto.news’ editorial. Digital assets have long grappled with regulatory ambiguity, but two recently enacted United States legislative pieces are ending an era of chaos by delivering structural clarity. The Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins Act (GENIUS Act) and the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 (Clarity Act) are potent signals of a major shift in how digital assets are built, traded, and understood. Summary The GENIUS Act ring-fences stablecoin liquidity — requiring 1:1 backing in highly liquid assets, banning yield for simply holding, and segregating reserves to prevent rehypothecation. Income and liquidity are now legally separated — yield-generating activity must happen on distinct layers or products, freeing the base liquidity layer from speculative pressure. The Clarity Act defines digital commodities vs. investment contracts — giving builders a modular framework to separate utility tokens from profit-driven schemes, reducing SEC/CFTC turf wars. Regulatory certainty fuels innovation — clearer rules, consumer protections, and risk disclosures are drawing praise from industry leaders and setting the stage for U.S. leadership in crypto. Most importantly, there is now a logical basis of separation between income-generating mechanisms and underlying liquidity. Let’s unpack what that means. How the GENIUS Act ring-fences liquidity The GENIUS Act targets payment stablecoins with unprecedented precision, mandating that they must be 1:1 backed by highly liquid assets, like U.S. dollars or short-term treasuries. Reserves must be held in segregated accounts without re-hypothecation (the holding institute cannot use the funds). The act also explicitly prohibits interest or yield payments solely for holding, using, or retaining stablecoins. With a separation of income and liquidity, we can unequivocally define stablecoins as a pure form of base-layer liquidity, perfect for payments, settlements,… The post Regulation encourages the separation of income and liquidity appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed here belong solely to the author and do not represent the views and opinions of crypto.news’ editorial. Digital assets have long grappled with regulatory ambiguity, but two recently enacted United States legislative pieces are ending an era of chaos by delivering structural clarity. The Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins Act (GENIUS Act) and the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 (Clarity Act) are potent signals of a major shift in how digital assets are built, traded, and understood. Summary The GENIUS Act ring-fences stablecoin liquidity — requiring 1:1 backing in highly liquid assets, banning yield for simply holding, and segregating reserves to prevent rehypothecation. Income and liquidity are now legally separated — yield-generating activity must happen on distinct layers or products, freeing the base liquidity layer from speculative pressure. The Clarity Act defines digital commodities vs. investment contracts — giving builders a modular framework to separate utility tokens from profit-driven schemes, reducing SEC/CFTC turf wars. Regulatory certainty fuels innovation — clearer rules, consumer protections, and risk disclosures are drawing praise from industry leaders and setting the stage for U.S. leadership in crypto. Most importantly, there is now a logical basis of separation between income-generating mechanisms and underlying liquidity. Let’s unpack what that means. How the GENIUS Act ring-fences liquidity The GENIUS Act targets payment stablecoins with unprecedented precision, mandating that they must be 1:1 backed by highly liquid assets, like U.S. dollars or short-term treasuries. Reserves must be held in segregated accounts without re-hypothecation (the holding institute cannot use the funds). The act also explicitly prohibits interest or yield payments solely for holding, using, or retaining stablecoins. With a separation of income and liquidity, we can unequivocally define stablecoins as a pure form of base-layer liquidity, perfect for payments, settlements,…

Regulation encourages the separation of income and liquidity

Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed here belong solely to the author and do not represent the views and opinions of crypto.news’ editorial.

Digital assets have long grappled with regulatory ambiguity, but two recently enacted United States legislative pieces are ending an era of chaos by delivering structural clarity. The Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins Act (GENIUS Act) and the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 (Clarity Act) are potent signals of a major shift in how digital assets are built, traded, and understood.

Summary

  • The GENIUS Act ring-fences stablecoin liquidity — requiring 1:1 backing in highly liquid assets, banning yield for simply holding, and segregating reserves to prevent rehypothecation.
  • Income and liquidity are now legally separated — yield-generating activity must happen on distinct layers or products, freeing the base liquidity layer from speculative pressure.
  • The Clarity Act defines digital commodities vs. investment contracts — giving builders a modular framework to separate utility tokens from profit-driven schemes, reducing SEC/CFTC turf wars.
  • Regulatory certainty fuels innovation — clearer rules, consumer protections, and risk disclosures are drawing praise from industry leaders and setting the stage for U.S. leadership in crypto.

Most importantly, there is now a logical basis of separation between income-generating mechanisms and underlying liquidity. Let’s unpack what that means.

How the GENIUS Act ring-fences liquidity

The GENIUS Act targets payment stablecoins with unprecedented precision, mandating that they must be 1:1 backed by highly liquid assets, like U.S. dollars or short-term treasuries. Reserves must be held in segregated accounts without re-hypothecation (the holding institute cannot use the funds). The act also explicitly prohibits interest or yield payments solely for holding, using, or retaining stablecoins.

With a separation of income and liquidity, we can unequivocally define stablecoins as a pure form of base-layer liquidity, perfect for payments, settlements, and stable value transfers. In the U.S., they are no longer a passive income vehicle, and by stripping them of their yield mechanisms, the GENIUS Act forces builders to innovate. 

For U.S.-based crypto investors, any yield-generating activity involving stablecoins must now take place on a separate layer or financial product, distinct from the stablecoin itself. Some may not be thrilled by this news, but this regulatory clarity ensures that speculative yield expectations unburden the liquidity layer. This will force disruption in one of the most widely adopted use cases for cryptocurrency. 

The Clarity Act is an architect for modular systems

Complementing the GENIUS Act is the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 (H.R. 3633). This passed the House and is heading to the Senate, aiming to resolve the longstanding jurisdictional ambiguities between the SEC and CFTC. It introduced statutory definitions for various digital assets, notably distinguishing “digital commodities” from “investment contracts.”

From now on, digital commodities will be those that derive their value from utility within a network. Investment contracts, however, will be vehicles through which a profit expectation from the efforts of others is conveyed. The core utility token (now a digital commodity) will be separated from any associated investment schemes or yield-generating activities (now investment contracts). This clarity will empower projects to build modular systems and go to market without worrying that the SEC may challenge their activities. 

Yield-bearing layers vs. Base-layer liquidity

There’s now a framework in place to separate the different functions of a blockchain system and regulate them accordingly. This is thanks to the Clarity Act’s provisions regarding tailored registration for digital commodity offerings and its recognition of “Decentralized Systems” and “Decentralized Finance Trading Protocols”. Consider this a kind of regulatory sandbox and definitive demarcation line between “yield-bearing layers” and “base-layer liquidity”. These are terms we will be seeing used more frequently. 

The eventual outcome of this decoupling is that transparency and proper disclosure are achieved, ensuring users (and builders) understand the risks associated with yield. Builders gain clearer pathways to design compliant products, while investors know exactly what they’re getting into. 

Predictability provides the confidence and trust to attract substantial capital, while the U.S. taking this unique stance could inspire a great deal of domestic innovation and leadership. Sure, there will be implementation challenges and friction ahead, but this is a real moment of maturation for crypto in the U.S. 

A new dawn of certainty

Experts generally echo positive sentiment about this change. Forbes, for example, has lauded the acts for providing much-needed clarity, reducing “jurisdictional turf wars,” and setting the stage for institutional engagement. Paul Grewal, Chief Legal Officer at Coinbase, noted:

Ji Hun Kim, President and Acting Chief Executive Officer, Crypto Council for Innovation, stated that the GENIUS Act “includes important consumer protections, such as segregating customer funds, bankruptcy procedures, addressing conflicts of interest, and requiring risk disclosures of operation, ownership, and structure. We strongly support these requirements that would protect consumers and their funds.”

These powerful regulatory design signals are confidently reshaping digital assets, compelling necessary separations and modularity. Ultimately, they encourage much-needed innovation of the liquidity and yield-bearing layers by legally protecting them and their architectures. The Gensler era is over, as the GENIUS era begins.

Andrei Grachev

Andrei Grachev is the managing partner of DWF Labs, a new-generation web3 investor and one of the world’s largest high-frequency trading entities in the digital asset space. Under his leadership, DWF Labs operates across more than 60 top exchanges, executing sophisticated trading strategies in both spot and derivatives markets, while actively investing in and supporting web3 projects globally. Andrei is also the managing partner of Falcon Finance, a next-generation synthetic dollar protocol. Falcon’s flagship asset, USDf, is an overcollateralized synthetic dollar backed by diversified crypto and real-world assets. Built for sustainable yield and capital preservation, Falcon combines transparency, institutional-grade risk management, and composability, setting a new standard for synthetic finance in a regulated future. Known for his deep understanding of market dynamics, infrastructure development, and digital asset economics, Andrei sits at the intersection of crypto finance and long-term ecosystem building. His work continues to shape the global conversation around stablecoins, synthetic assets, and the evolution of on-chain capital markets.

Source: https://crypto.news/regulation-encourages-separation-income-and-liquidity/

Market Opportunity
FORM Logo
FORM Price(FORM)
$0.3745
$0.3745$0.3745
-0.82%
USD
FORM (FORM) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Taiko Makes Chainlink Data Streams Its Official Oracle

Taiko Makes Chainlink Data Streams Its Official Oracle

The post Taiko Makes Chainlink Data Streams Its Official Oracle appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Notes Taiko has officially integrated Chainlink Data Streams for its Layer 2 network. The integration provides developers with high-speed market data to build advanced DeFi applications. The move aims to improve security and attract institutional adoption by using Chainlink’s established infrastructure. Taiko, an Ethereum-based ETH $4 514 24h volatility: 0.4% Market cap: $545.57 B Vol. 24h: $28.23 B Layer 2 rollup, has announced the integration of Chainlink LINK $23.26 24h volatility: 1.7% Market cap: $15.75 B Vol. 24h: $787.15 M Data Streams. The development comes as the underlying Ethereum network continues to see significant on-chain activity, including large sales from ETH whales. The partnership establishes Chainlink as the official oracle infrastructure for the network. It is designed to provide developers on the Taiko platform with reliable and high-speed market data, essential for building a wide range of decentralized finance (DeFi) applications, from complex derivatives platforms to more niche projects involving unique token governance models. According to the project’s official announcement on Sept. 17, the integration enables the creation of more advanced on-chain products that require high-quality, tamper-proof data to function securely. Taiko operates as a “based rollup,” which means it leverages Ethereum validators for transaction sequencing for strong decentralization. Boosting DeFi and Institutional Interest Oracles are fundamental services in the blockchain industry. They act as secure bridges that feed external, off-chain information to on-chain smart contracts. DeFi protocols, in particular, rely on oracles for accurate, real-time price feeds. Taiko leadership stated that using Chainlink’s infrastructure aligns with its goals. The team hopes the partnership will help attract institutional crypto investment and support the development of real-world applications, a goal that aligns with Chainlink’s broader mission to bring global data on-chain. Integrating real-world economic information is part of a broader industry trend. Just last week, Chainlink partnered with the Sei…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:34
Kalshi Prediction Markets Are Pulling In $1 Billion Monthly as State Regulators Loom

Kalshi Prediction Markets Are Pulling In $1 Billion Monthly as State Regulators Loom

The post Kalshi Prediction Markets Are Pulling In $1 Billion Monthly as State Regulators Loom appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief Kalshi reached $1 billion in monthly volume and now dominates 62% of the global prediction market industry, surpassing Polymarket’s 37% share. Four states including Massachusetts have filed lawsuits claiming Kalshi operates as an unlicensed sportsbook, with Massachusetts seeking to permanently bar the platform. Kalshi operates under federal CFTC regulation as a designated contract market, arguing this preempts state gambling laws that require separate licensing. Prediction market Kalshi just topped $1 billion in monthly volume as state regulators nip at its heels with lawsuits alleging that it’s an unregistered sports betting platform. “Despite being limited to only American customers, Kalshi has now risen to dominate the global prediction market industry,” the company said in a press release. “New data scraped from publicly available activity metrics details this rise.” The publicly available data appears on a Dune Analytics dashboard that’s been tracking prediction market notional volume. The data show that Kalshi now accounts for roughly 62% of global prediction market volume, Polymarket for 37%, and the rest split between Limitless and Myriad, the prediction market owned by Decrypt parent company Dastan. Trading volume on Kalshi skyrocketed in August, not coincidentally at the start of the NFL season and as the prediction market pushes further into sports.  But regulators in Maryland, Nevada, and New Jersey have all issued cease-and-desist orders, arguing Kalshi’s event contracts amount to unlicensed sports betting. Each case has spilled into federal court, with judges issuing preliminary rulings but no final decisions yet. Last week, Massachusetts went further, filing a lawsuit that calls Kalshi’s sports contracts “illegal and unsafe sports wagering.” The 43-page Massachusetts lawsuit seeks to stop the company from allowing state residents on its platform—much the way Coinbase has had to do with its staking offerings in parts of the United States. Massachusetts Attorney General…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/19 09:21
[Pastilan] End the confidential fund madness

[Pastilan] End the confidential fund madness

UPDATE RULES. Former Commission on Audit commissioner Heidi Mendoza speaks during a public forum.
Share
Rappler2026/01/16 14:02