Ripple, Coinbase, and Circle Bank Charters at Risk as ABA Demands OCC Slowdown

The post Ripple, Coinbase, and Circle Bank Charters at Risk as ABA Demands OCC Slowdown appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News

The American Bankers Association (ABA), the largest banking lobby in the United States, has asked the OCC to immediately pause national bank charter reviews for crypto firms. Ripple, Coinbase, Circle, and several others are directly affected.

In a letter to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the ABA said the process should be put on hold until Congress finishes writing the rules these companies will operate under.

Why Is the ABA Pushing Back?

The GENIUS Act, the federal stablecoin law, requires five agencies to complete their own rulemaking before it’s fully implemented. That includes the OCC, Treasury, Federal Reserve, FDIC, and state regulators.

The ABA says that process is likely still years away, making it too early to approve charters based on compliance with a law that isn’t finished yet.

• Also Read :
•   Thailand Approves Bitcoin for Derivatives Market, Crypto ETFs Could Follow
•   ,

The association also raised concerns about insolvency risk. If a crypto firm with an OCC charter goes under, the OCC would be responsible for handling the fallout.

They pointed to FTX, which misused roughly $8 billion in client funds, and Celsius, which had a $1.2 billion deficit on its balance sheet, as reasons the current system may not be ready.

Which Crypto Firms Could Be Affected?

Ripple is at the top of the list. The OCC granted the XRP issuer conditional approval last month, which drew immediate opposition from the ABA. World Liberty Financial also filed to become a federally chartered national trust bank, a move that led Senator Warren to call for a halt.

Other firms waiting in the queue include Circle, BitGo, Paxos, Coinbase, and Nomura’s Laser Digital.

What Comes Next?

The ABA also pushed for a naming rule change. They want crypto firms that only handle trust or fiduciary activities to be barred from using “bank” in their name, arguing it could mislead consumers and damage public confidence in the banking system if one of these entities fails.

With the regulatory framework still incomplete and traditional banks pressing the OCC to slow down, the path to a national crypto bank charter just got a lot harder for these firms.

Never Miss a Beat in the Crypto World!

Stay ahead with breaking news, expert analysis, and real-time updates on the latest trends in Bitcoin, altcoins, DeFi, NFTs, and more.

Subscribe to News

FAQs

What would a delay in OCC charter approvals mean for crypto companies?

A pause could slow expansion plans, limit access to certain federal banking privileges, and delay partnerships with traditional financial institutions. Firms may need to continue operating under state licenses or alternative structures while waiting for clarity.

How could this debate affect consumers using crypto-linked financial services?

Regulatory uncertainty may delay the rollout of new banking-style products tied to digital assets. At the same time, a slower approval process could lead to stricter oversight, potentially offering stronger consumer protections in the long term.

Why does the use of the word “bank” matter in charter discussions?

In the U.S., the term “bank” carries legal and consumer trust implications tied to deposit insurance and federal supervision. Restricting its use could reduce confusion about what protections customers actually have if a firm faces financial trouble.

What factors will influence the OCC’s next move?

The agency will likely weigh input from industry groups, lawmakers, and other regulators while monitoring progress on federal rulemaking. Political pressure, financial stability concerns, and interagency coordination could all shape the final decision.