Weeks after Tornado Cash co-founder Roman Storm was convicted on a money transmission charge, a Department of Justice official said the agency would reject similar charges going forward. “Where the evidence shows that software is truly decentralised and solely automates peer to peer transactions, and where a third-party does not have custody and control over user assets, new [money transmission] charges against a third party will not be approved,” Matthew Galeotti, acting assistant attorney general of the department’s Justice Criminal Division, said Thursday. “If criminal intent is present, other charges may be appropriate.” Galeotti was speaking at the American Innovation Project Summit in Jackson, Wyoming. The AIP is a nonprofit that launched earlier this week with support from several crypto companies and advocacy groups, including Coinbase and Uniswap Labs. “The fact the DOJ acknowledged that software developers should not be held responsible for third party’s misuse of their code affirms what we have bee advocating for years,” Amanda Tuminelli, executive director of crypto advocacy firm DeFi Education Fund, said in a statement. Tuminelli introduced Galeotti at the conference. Galeotti’s comments address one of the industry’s chief concerns: prosecutors’ ability to bring charges against software developers who build applications that were later used by cybercriminals seeking to launder stolen crypto. Storm, the Tornado Cash developer, said his protocol was developed to provide privacy on Ethereum and other blockchains. But Tornado Cash became popular with cybercriminals, including hackers affiliated with North Korea, who used the protocol to launder more than $500 million in crypto stolen in 2022. Last month, Storm’s criminal trial began in New York. Storm was facing charges of conspiracy to launder money, evade sanctions, and operate an unlicensed money transmitting business. The money transmission charge alarmed the industry. Storm’s supporters said that it misunderstood the way Tornado Cash works and that a conviction would chill the development of privacy-preserving software. Early this month, jurors convicted Storm on the money transmission charge, but could not reach a unanimous decision on the money laundering and sanctions evasion charges. Prosecutors could choose to retry Storm on both counts. It was not immediately clear whether Galeotti’s announcement would have protected Storm from the charges he faced in his criminal trial. Although the industry held that Tornado Cash never took custody of user funds and was fully decentralised — in other words, that Storm was powerless to stop hackers from using the protocol — prosecutors argued Storm in reality exercised meaningful control. Nevertheless, crypto policy experts celebrated Galeotti’s announcement Thursday. “For too long, crypto and open source developers in the US have been living under a cloud of doubt,” Katie Biber, chief legal officer at crypto venture firm Paradigm, wrote on X. “That uncertainty ends today, with an emphatic statement from the DOJ that *shipping code is not a crime.*” The announcement builds on a Justice Department memo issued before Storm’s trial began in July. In a four-page memo published in April, the department said it no longer intends to pursue cases in which it charges crypto mixers “for the acts of their end users or unwitting violations of regulations.”In a footnote, however, the department said it was not changing its guidance in cases where business owners know they’re handling dirty money — exactly the argument that prosecutors made in Storm’s trial. Galeotti doubled down on that sentiment Thursday. “Our view is that merely writing code without ill intent is not a crime,” Galeotti said. “Innovating new ways for the economy to store and transmit value and create wealth without ill intent is not a crime. The criminal division will, however, continue to prosecute those who willingly commit crimes.” Aleks Gilbert is DL News’ New York-based DeFi reporter. You can reach him at aleks@dlnews.com.Weeks after Tornado Cash co-founder Roman Storm was convicted on a money transmission charge, a Department of Justice official said the agency would reject similar charges going forward. “Where the evidence shows that software is truly decentralised and solely automates peer to peer transactions, and where a third-party does not have custody and control over user assets, new [money transmission] charges against a third party will not be approved,” Matthew Galeotti, acting assistant attorney general of the department’s Justice Criminal Division, said Thursday. “If criminal intent is present, other charges may be appropriate.” Galeotti was speaking at the American Innovation Project Summit in Jackson, Wyoming. The AIP is a nonprofit that launched earlier this week with support from several crypto companies and advocacy groups, including Coinbase and Uniswap Labs. “The fact the DOJ acknowledged that software developers should not be held responsible for third party’s misuse of their code affirms what we have bee advocating for years,” Amanda Tuminelli, executive director of crypto advocacy firm DeFi Education Fund, said in a statement. Tuminelli introduced Galeotti at the conference. Galeotti’s comments address one of the industry’s chief concerns: prosecutors’ ability to bring charges against software developers who build applications that were later used by cybercriminals seeking to launder stolen crypto. Storm, the Tornado Cash developer, said his protocol was developed to provide privacy on Ethereum and other blockchains. But Tornado Cash became popular with cybercriminals, including hackers affiliated with North Korea, who used the protocol to launder more than $500 million in crypto stolen in 2022. Last month, Storm’s criminal trial began in New York. Storm was facing charges of conspiracy to launder money, evade sanctions, and operate an unlicensed money transmitting business. The money transmission charge alarmed the industry. Storm’s supporters said that it misunderstood the way Tornado Cash works and that a conviction would chill the development of privacy-preserving software. Early this month, jurors convicted Storm on the money transmission charge, but could not reach a unanimous decision on the money laundering and sanctions evasion charges. Prosecutors could choose to retry Storm on both counts. It was not immediately clear whether Galeotti’s announcement would have protected Storm from the charges he faced in his criminal trial. Although the industry held that Tornado Cash never took custody of user funds and was fully decentralised — in other words, that Storm was powerless to stop hackers from using the protocol — prosecutors argued Storm in reality exercised meaningful control. Nevertheless, crypto policy experts celebrated Galeotti’s announcement Thursday. “For too long, crypto and open source developers in the US have been living under a cloud of doubt,” Katie Biber, chief legal officer at crypto venture firm Paradigm, wrote on X. “That uncertainty ends today, with an emphatic statement from the DOJ that *shipping code is not a crime.*” The announcement builds on a Justice Department memo issued before Storm’s trial began in July. In a four-page memo published in April, the department said it no longer intends to pursue cases in which it charges crypto mixers “for the acts of their end users or unwitting violations of regulations.”In a footnote, however, the department said it was not changing its guidance in cases where business owners know they’re handling dirty money — exactly the argument that prosecutors made in Storm’s trial. Galeotti doubled down on that sentiment Thursday. “Our view is that merely writing code without ill intent is not a crime,” Galeotti said. “Innovating new ways for the economy to store and transmit value and create wealth without ill intent is not a crime. The criminal division will, however, continue to prosecute those who willingly commit crimes.” Aleks Gilbert is DL News’ New York-based DeFi reporter. You can reach him at aleks@dlnews.com.

Devs behind ‘truly decentralised’ protocols won’t face DoJ prosecution, official says

Weeks after Tornado Cash co-founder Roman Storm was convicted on a money transmission charge, a Department of Justice official said the agency would reject similar charges going forward.

“Where the evidence shows that software is truly decentralised and solely automates peer to peer transactions, and where a third-party does not have custody and control over user assets, new [money transmission] charges against a third party will not be approved,” Matthew Galeotti, acting assistant attorney general of the department’s Justice Criminal Division, said Thursday.

“If criminal intent is present, other charges may be appropriate.”

Galeotti was speaking at the American Innovation Project Summit in Jackson, Wyoming. The AIP is a nonprofit that launched earlier this week with support from several crypto companies and advocacy groups, including Coinbase and Uniswap Labs.

“The fact the DOJ acknowledged that software developers should not be held responsible for third party’s misuse of their code affirms what we have bee advocating for years,” Amanda Tuminelli, executive director of crypto advocacy firm DeFi Education Fund, said in a statement. Tuminelli introduced Galeotti at the conference.

Galeotti’s comments address one of the industry’s chief concerns: prosecutors’ ability to bring charges against software developers who build applications that were later used by cybercriminals seeking to launder stolen crypto.

Storm, the Tornado Cash developer, said his protocol was developed to provide privacy on Ethereum and other blockchains.

But Tornado Cash became popular with cybercriminals, including hackers affiliated with North Korea, who used the protocol to launder more than $500 million in crypto stolen in 2022.

Last month, Storm’s criminal trial began in New York. Storm was facing charges of conspiracy to launder money, evade sanctions, and operate an unlicensed money transmitting business.

The money transmission charge alarmed the industry. Storm’s supporters said that it misunderstood the way Tornado Cash works and that a conviction would chill the development of privacy-preserving software.

Early this month, jurors convicted Storm on the money transmission charge, but could not reach a unanimous decision on the money laundering and sanctions evasion charges. Prosecutors could choose to retry Storm on both counts.

It was not immediately clear whether Galeotti’s announcement would have protected Storm from the charges he faced in his criminal trial.

Although the industry held that Tornado Cash never took custody of user funds and was fully decentralised — in other words, that Storm was powerless to stop hackers from using the protocol — prosecutors argued Storm in reality exercised meaningful control.

Nevertheless, crypto policy experts celebrated Galeotti’s announcement Thursday.

“For too long, crypto and open source developers in the US have been living under a cloud of doubt,” Katie Biber, chief legal officer at crypto venture firm Paradigm, wrote on X.

“That uncertainty ends today, with an emphatic statement from the DOJ that *shipping code is not a crime.*”

The announcement builds on a Justice Department memo issued before Storm’s trial began in July.

In a four-page memo published in April, the department said it no longer intends to pursue cases in which it charges crypto mixers “for the acts of their end users or unwitting violations of regulations.”

In a footnote, however, the department said it was not changing its guidance in cases where business owners know they’re handling dirty money — exactly the argument that prosecutors made in Storm’s trial.

Galeotti doubled down on that sentiment Thursday.

“Our view is that merely writing code without ill intent is not a crime,” Galeotti said. “Innovating new ways for the economy to store and transmit value and create wealth without ill intent is not a crime. The criminal division will, however, continue to prosecute those who willingly commit crimes.”

Aleks Gilbert is DL News’ New York-based DeFi reporter. You can reach him at aleks@dlnews.com.

Market Opportunity
LETSTOP Logo
LETSTOP Price(STOP)
$0.01916
$0.01916$0.01916
-0.41%
USD
LETSTOP (STOP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
BFX Presale Raises $7.5M as Solana Holds $243 and Avalanche Eyes $1B Treasury — Best Cryptos to Buy in 2025

BFX Presale Raises $7.5M as Solana Holds $243 and Avalanche Eyes $1B Treasury — Best Cryptos to Buy in 2025

BFX presale hits $7.5M with tokens at $0.024 and 30% bonus code BLOCK30, while Solana holds $243 and Avalanche builds a $1B treasury to attract institutions.
Share
Blockchainreporter2025/09/18 01:07
XRP Price Prediction: XRP to Soar as This Top Crypto Under $0.05 Eyes 5000% Rally

XRP Price Prediction: XRP to Soar as This Top Crypto Under $0.05 Eyes 5000% Rally

While the sentiment grows with regard to a possible positive breakout in the XRP pricing, expert investors continue to turn their attention to the best cryptocurrency
Share
Cryptopolitan2025/12/29 01:30