CoinGlass has called into question the authenticity of decentralized perps platforms, with Aster, Lighter and Hyperliquid data showing discrepancies. Some, likeCoinGlass has called into question the authenticity of decentralized perps platforms, with Aster, Lighter and Hyperliquid data showing discrepancies. Some, like

Hyperliquid Draws Scrutiny as Coinglass Exposes Inconsistencies in Perp DEX Volumes

  • CoinGlass has called into question the authenticity of decentralized perps platforms, with Aster, Lighter and Hyperliquid data showing discrepancies.
  • Some, like Multicoin Capital founder Kyle Samani, used the data to attack Hyperliquid, calling it a facilitator of crime and terror.

Decentralized derivatives exchanges are once again on the spotlight, with data from CoinGlass calling into questions some of the figures reported by Hyperliquid, Aster and Lighter.

CoinGlass compared the three platforms on data recorded on Sunday, Feb 9. Hyperliquid reportedly posted $3.76 billion in trading volume, with a $4.05 billion open interest and $122.96 million in liquidations. Aster’s volume stood at $2.76 billion, but its open interest and liquidations hit $927 million and $7.2 million, respectively.

Lighter came in at third with $1.81 billion in volume, and open interest and liquidations at $731 million and $3.34 million, respectively.

As CoinGlass points out, in a perps trading environment with authentic activity that’s not manipulated, there should be “meaningful open interest dynamics and larger liquidation numbers.” During market moves, there must also be stronger long and short stress.

However, the data from the three shows that while trading volume is relatively close, Aster and Lighter’s liquidations are much lower than Hyperliquid’s at 1:17 and 1:37.

CoinGlass believes that this notable discrepancy stems from these two platforms’ outsized incentive-driven looping. This means that they have been offering incentives to some traders on their platforms, such as through points and airdrop farming.

It could also stem from market makers engaging in self trading and wash trading or the platforms could be inflating the volume by using a different methodology to report on their metrics. CoinGlass concluded:

The Hyperliquid and Aster Manipulation Debates

The CoinGlass data stirred mixed responses. Those who have been critical of the DEXes jumped on to use the data to double down on their criticism, while their communities were quick to defend the metrics and question’s CoinGlass’ motives.

One of the notable critics is Kyle Samani, the founder and former managing partner of Multicoin Capital, an investment fund that was an early backer of projects like Algorand, Dfinity, Kalshi, Lido, Solana and Worldcoin. He stepped down from Multicoin last week.

Samani took to X to describe Hyperliquid as “everything wrong with crypto.” He claims that the platform openly facilitates crime and terror and that a combination of a permissioned and closed-source platform, with a founder who fled the country, presents a level of risk traders should avoid. (It’s worth noting that Hyperliquid founder Jeff Yan grew up in California and is still a resident of the US).

KYLEImage courtesy of Kyle Samani on X.

Samani was immediately called out by many, with some describing his post as “Elizabeth Warren-style fearmongering.” Arthur Hayes, the founder and former CEO of BitMEX exchange even bet Samani that HYPE would outperform any token with over $1 billion in market cap; the wager was for $100,000, although Samani hasn’t accepted it at press time.

Aster also had its defenders. One user on X, who identifies as the DEX’s Spanish Discord moderator, dismissed the CoinGlass research as just speculation.

“Wow, I thought Coinglass was a reputable company…Taking these metrics from a single day, a Sunday, just to speculate on a possible explanation is truly malicious,” he posted.

It’s not the first time Hyperliquid has been caught up in such speculation. As we reported, IOTA founder Dominik Schiener had to come to the project’s defense in December after multiple claims of a lack of transparency.

]]>
Market Opportunity
Perpetual Protocol Logo
Perpetual Protocol Price(PERP)
$0.0251
$0.0251$0.0251
+1.66%
USD
Perpetual Protocol (PERP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Hadron Labs Launches Bitcoin Summer on Neutron, Offering 5–10% BTC Yield

Hadron Labs Launches Bitcoin Summer on Neutron, Offering 5–10% BTC Yield

Hadron Labs launches 'Bitcoin Summer' on Neutron, BTC vaults for WBTC, eBTC, solvBTC, uniBTC and USDC. Earn 5–10% BTC via maxBTC, with up to 10x looping.
Share
Blockchainreporter2025/09/18 02:00
South Korea Launches First Won-Backed Stablecoin KRW1 on Avalanche

South Korea Launches First Won-Backed Stablecoin KRW1 on Avalanche

South Korea made history this week by launching its first Korean won-backed stablecoin.
Share
Brave Newcoin2025/09/19 03:15
Curve Finance votes on revenue-sharing model for CRV holders

Curve Finance votes on revenue-sharing model for CRV holders

The post Curve Finance votes on revenue-sharing model for CRV holders appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Curve Finance has proposed a new protocol called Yield Basis that would share revenue directly with CRV holders, marking a shift from one-off incentives to sustainable income. Summary Curve Finance has put forward a revenue-sharing protocol to give CRV holders sustainable income beyond emissions and fees. The plan would mint $60M in crvUSD to seed three Bitcoin liquidity pools (WBTC, cbBTC, tBTC), with 35–65% of revenue distributed to veCRV stakers. The DAO vote runs from up to Sept. 24, with the proposal seen as a major step to strengthen CRV tokenomics after past liquidity and governance challenges. Curve Finance founder Michael Egorov has introduced a proposal to give CRV token holders a more direct way to earn income, launching a system called Yield Basis that aims to turn the governance token into a sustainable, yield-bearing asset.  The proposal has been published on the Curve DAO (CRV) governance forum, with voting open until Sept. 24. A new model for CRV rewards Yield Basis is designed to distribute transparent and consistent returns to CRV holders who lock their tokens for veCRV governance rights. Unlike past incentive programs, which relied heavily on airdrops and emissions, the protocol channels income from Bitcoin-focused liquidity pools directly back to token holders. To start, Curve would mint $60 million worth of crvUSD, its over-collateralized stablecoin, with proceeds allocated across three pools — WBTC, cbBTC, and tBTC — each capped at $10 million. 25% of Yield Basis tokens would be reserved for the Curve ecosystem, and between 35% and 65% of Yield Basis’s revenue would be given to veCRV holders. By emphasizing Bitcoin (BTC) liquidity and offering yields without the short-term loss risks associated with automated market makers, the protocol hopes to draw in professional traders and institutions. Context and potential impact on Curve Finance The proposal comes as Curve continues to modify…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 14:37