Metaplanet is choosing accumulation over retreat as Bitcoin trades nearly 50% below its October peak, with CEO Simon Gerovich confirming that the company will continueMetaplanet is choosing accumulation over retreat as Bitcoin trades nearly 50% below its October peak, with CEO Simon Gerovich confirming that the company will continue

Metaplanet Doubles Down on Bitcoin as Drawdown Tests Conviction

2026/02/07 17:14
3 min read

Metaplanet is choosing accumulation over retreat as Bitcoin trades nearly 50% below its October peak, with CEO Simon Gerovich confirming that the company will continue adding BTC despite mounting unrealized losses.

The stance comes as both Bitcoin and Metaplanet’s equity absorb heavy pressure, forcing investors to reassess how far a Bitcoin-first strategy can stretch during a prolonged downturn.

Commitment Holds Even as Price Structure Weakens

Bitcoin briefly dipped near $60,000 in early February, extending a drawdown that has persisted since late 2025. Rather than signaling caution, Gerovich reiterated that accumulation will continue steadily, framing the sell-off as a test of discipline rather than a thesis break.

That approach mirrors Metaplanet’s positioning over the past year, where purchases were concentrated during volatility rather than strength. The strategy assumes that long-term balance-sheet exposure matters more than near-term mark-to-market performance.

Treasury Scale and Accumulation Targets

As of February 6, Metaplanet holds 35,102 BTC, making it the fourth-largest publicly traded Bitcoin holder globally. The company’s so-called “555 Million Plan” sets ambitious targets: 100,000 BTC by the end of 2026 and 210,000 BTC by 2027.

The most aggressive phase of buying occurred in Q4 2025, when Metaplanet added 4,279 BTC for roughly $451 million. That expansion materially lifted exposure but also locked in a high cost basis. The firm’s average acquisition price now sits near $107,000 per BTC, leaving the treasury deeply underwater at current market levels.

Equity Pressure Reflects Balance-Sheet Risk

The impact has been most visible in the stock. Metaplanet shares (TYO: 3350) closed at ¥340 on February 6, down 5.56% on the session and roughly 82% below their June 2025 peak. The equity has increasingly traded as a leveraged proxy for Bitcoin, amplifying downside during drawdowns.

At the same time, management has continued to signal confidence. On January 29, the board approved an equity financing plan to raise up to ¥21 billion (around $137 million), earmarked for further Bitcoin purchases and debt management.

Bitcoin Inflows to Binance Rise as Selling Pressure and Panic Build

Balancing Losses With Operating Income

Financially, the company is absorbing pressure on multiple fronts. Metaplanet expects non-cash impairment charges of roughly $680 million for 2025 due to Bitcoin’s decline. Even so, it raised its 2026 revenue guidance to $103 million, pointing to growth in its Bitcoin income generation business as a partial offset.

The balance sheet also carries approximately $280 million in outstanding debt, adding another layer of sensitivity to prolonged weakness in BTC prices. Management’s challenge is maintaining access to capital without forcing dilution at depressed equity levels.

Structural Takeaway

Metaplanet’s position is becoming clearer: this is no longer a tactical Bitcoin allocation, but a structural identity. The company is willing to tolerate deep unrealized losses, equity volatility, and balance-sheet strain in exchange for maximizing long-term BTC exposure.

Whether that conviction is rewarded will depend less on short-term rebounds and more on Bitcoin’s ability to reassert an upward macro structure before financing and dilution risks begin to dominate the narrative.

The post Metaplanet Doubles Down on Bitcoin as Drawdown Tests Conviction appeared first on ETHNews.

Market Opportunity
Bitcoin Logo
Bitcoin Price(BTC)
$69,341.45
$69,341.45$69,341.45
+0.27%
USD
Bitcoin (BTC) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 7, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — HitPaw, a leader in AI-powered visual enhancement solutions, announced Comfy, a global content creation platform, is
Share
AI Journal2026/02/08 09:15
Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

A Journalist gave a brutal review of the new Melania documentary, which has been criticized by those who say it won't make back the huge fees spent to make it,
Share
Rawstory2026/02/08 09:08
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00