Onchain data is drawing attention to two large ETH whales after analysts spotted a shared Binance deposit address. According to Lookonchain, wallets are tied toOnchain data is drawing attention to two large ETH whales after analysts spotted a shared Binance deposit address. According to Lookonchain, wallets are tied to

Onchain Data Links Two Major ETH Whales via Binance Address

2026/02/07 14:38
3 min read

Onchain data is drawing attention to two large ETH whales after analysts spotted a shared Binance deposit address. According to Lookonchain, wallets are tied to Garrett Jin and Trend Research. Both routed funds through the same Binance address before reaching a Binance hot wallet. The discovery comes after both entities reported heavy losses during recent Ethereum market volatility. The link has sparked debate across the crypto community. About whether the activity shows coordination or just normal exchange behavior.

Shared Deposit Route Raises Questions

Onchain tracker Lookonchain said the address starting with 0xcdF acted as a middle step before funds reached Binance. One day earlier, a wallet tied to Trend Research sent about 7.98 million USDT to that Binance address. The funds then moved to a Binance hot wallet. At around the same time, another large wallet linked to Garrett Jin sent 10K ETH through the same Binance address. That transfer also ended up at the same Binance hot wallet.

Since both flows used the same deposit route. Some observers suggested a possible connection between the two traders. But others pointed out that exchanges often use shared deposit Binance addresses for different clients. This means the overlap may not signal direct coordination.

Both Traders Suffered Large Losses

The discovery gained attention because both ETH whales faced major losses during recent market moves. Onchain data show leveraged positions getting hit as Ethereum prices dropped sharply. Trend Research reportedly lost hundreds of millions of dollars after large long positions faced liquidation. Garrett Jin also suffered heavy losses after aggressive leveraged trades. These events happened during a broader market decline. When many leveraged positions across the crypto space were forced to close. The pressure caused a wave of liquidations and added to price swings.

Community Divided on the Meaning

The shared Binance address triggered speculation online. Some users suggested the two entities could be part of a larger coordinated strategy or even the same operator. But other analysts urged caution. They said shared deposit Binance addresses are common on large exchanges. Many traders may use the same routing address without knowing it. One market observer noted that the losses likely came from crowded trades and high leverage, not secret coordination. In fast moving markets, even experienced traders can face forced liquidations if prices move against them.

Focus Shifts to Risk and Leverage

The situation shows the risks of aggressive leverage in crypto markets. Large positions can look safe during calm periods. But when prices drop quickly, liquidation levels can trigger chain reactions. Recent market data already showed billions of dollars in long positions at risk across Ethereum. The losses tied to these whales reflect that broader trend. 

Currently, the shared Binance address link remains an onchain observation. Rather than confirmed evidence of coordination. Still, the episode has added another layer of intrigue to an already volatile period for ETH whales.

The post Onchain Data Links Two Major ETH Whales via Binance Address appeared first on Coinfomania.

Market Opportunity
Ethereum Logo
Ethereum Price(ETH)
$2,031.99
$2,031.99$2,031.99
+2.60%
USD
Ethereum (ETH) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Future of Metalworking: Advancements and Innovations

The Future of Metalworking: Advancements and Innovations

The demand for precision and efficiency in manufacturing processes continues to rise, leading to groundbreaking advancements in metalworking. This sector constantly
Share
Techbullion2026/02/07 19:24
Crypto whale loses $6M to sneaky phishing scheme targeting staked Ethereum

Crypto whale loses $6M to sneaky phishing scheme targeting staked Ethereum

The post Crypto whale loses $6M to sneaky phishing scheme targeting staked Ethereum appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A crypto whale lost more than $6 million in staked Ethereum (stETH) and Aave-wrapped Bitcoin (aEthWBTC) after approving malicious signatures in a phishing scheme on Sept. 18, according to blockchain security firm Scam Sniffer. According to the firm, the attackers disguised their move as a routine wallet confirmation through “Permit” signatures, which tricked the victim into authorizing fund transfers without triggering obvious red flags. Yu Xian, founder of blockchain security company SlowMist, noted that the victim did not recognize the danger because the transaction required no gas fees. He wrote: “From the victim’s perspective, he just clicked a few times to confirm the wallet’s pop-up signature requests, didn’t spend a single penny of gas, and $6.28 million was gone.” How Permit exploits work Permit approvals were originally designed to simplify token transfers. Instead of submitting an on-chain approval and paying fees, a user can sign an off-chain message authorizing a spender. That efficiency, however, has created a new attack surface for malicious players. Once a user signs such a permit, attackers can combine two functions—Permit and TransferFrom—to drain assets directly. Because the authorization takes place off-chain, wallet dashboards show no unusual activity until the funds move. As a result, the assets are gone when the approval executes on-chain, and tokens are redirected to the attacker’s wallet. This loophole has made permit exploits increasingly attractive for malicious actors, who can siphon millions without needing complex hacks or high-cost gas wars. Phishing losses The latest theft highlights a wider trend of escalating phishing campaigns. Scam Sniffer reported that in August alone, attackers stole $12.17 million from more than 15,200 victims. That figure represented a 72% jump in losses compared with July. According to the firm, the most significant share of August’s damages came from three large accounts that accounted for nearly half…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/19 02:31
WHALE ALERT: $351 MILLION Bitcoin Dump Incoming

WHALE ALERT: $351 MILLION Bitcoin Dump Incoming

One crypto whale transferred 5,000 Bitcoin, which is worth about 351 million, to Binance. Ash Crypto reported this transfer. It happened only several days after
Share
Coinfomania2026/02/07 19:36