Stablecoins moved back to the center of the U.S. policy debate as Senator Cynthia Lummis urged banks to adopt digital assets and expand their services. The call arrived while Congress faced new gridlock on the crypto market structure bill. Lawmakers continued to negotiate major sticking points that slowed efforts to form a unified regulatory framework.
Senator Lummis pressed banks to view stablecoins as an entry point into digital asset services and she argued that the products create new revenue options. Banks maintained firm resistance because they feared deposit outflows linked to stablecoin rewards. The disagreement continued to shape the debate as both committees examined financial risks and operational shifts.
Bank groups objected to any model that allowed platforms to offer yield on stablecoin balances, and they warned of negative impacts on community institutions. Lawmakers responded by adding strict language that barred digital asset firms from providing interest on idle holdings. The move strengthened the banking position yet expanded divisions within the broader policy discussion.
The updated draft forced digital asset companies to reassess their stance, and some withdrew support because they opposed the yield provision. Coinbase became the most prominent firm to exit the talks, which slowed momentum for the bill. Additional negotiations now aimed to reconcile positions that covered custody, payments, and stablecoin oversight.
The Senate Banking Committee and the Agriculture Committee continued to work through different frameworks, and both sides emphasized the need for clarity. Stablecoins remained the most sensitive element because lawmakers viewed them as a fast-growing competitor to traditional financial products. The committees also faced pressure to avoid regulatory gaps that could undermine market stability.
Treasury officials backed the creation of a federal regime and predicted rapid growth in the stablecoin market with supportive legislation. Analysts also warned that stablecoins could shift large sums away from bank deposits during the next few years. These assessments increased urgency, yet they also amplified fears inside the banking sector.
Senator Lummis said the opposition targeted specific rules tied to the GENIUS Act rather than the main market structure bill. She argued that stablecoins could speed payments and expand bank custody services across several states. The push framed digital assets as a growth channel while highlighting the industry’s long-term economic potential.
The stablecoin sector continued to grow even as Congress remained divided on yield restrictions. Market capitalization reached new highs, and companies expanded cross-border payment use cases. The trend highlighted rising demand and created further urgency for formal regulation.
Supporters said stablecoins strengthened the role of the U.S. dollar in global finance, and they noted their importance during economic stress. Analysts added that digital assets might continue gaining ground regardless of legislative delays. The perspective suggested that federal action would shape adoption but not stop long-term structural shifts.
Senate leadership signaled that the bill could return for debate later in the spring. Committee members planned additional reviews to align stablecoin standards, payment rules, and custody requirements. The outcome could determine how banks integrate digital assets and how stablecoins operate within the U.S. financial system.
The post Sen Lummis Pushes Banks to Embrace Stablecoins as Crypto Bill Faces Major Roadblocks appeared first on CoinCentral.

