TLDR The Coinbase Premium Gap has reached its lowest level in over a year, signaling weaker institutional demand for Bitcoin. The negative gap between Bitcoin pricesTLDR The Coinbase Premium Gap has reached its lowest level in over a year, signaling weaker institutional demand for Bitcoin. The negative gap between Bitcoin prices

Coinbase Premium Gap Hits Yearly Low, Signaling Institutional Selling

2026/02/06 01:40
3 min read

TLDR

  • The Coinbase Premium Gap has reached its lowest level in over a year, signaling weaker institutional demand for Bitcoin.
  • The negative gap between Bitcoin prices on Coinbase and Binance indicates intensified selling pressure from institutional investors.
  • CryptoQuant analysts report that institutional selling activity has increased, contributing to the current market downturn.
  • US spot Bitcoin ETFs have turned into net sellers in 2026, offloading more than 10,600 BTC, further adding to selling pressure.
  • The ongoing decrease in the Coinbase Premium Gap points to reduced interest and activity from professional Bitcoin investors.

The Coinbase Premium Gap has fallen to its lowest point in over a year, signaling weaker demand from institutional investors. This gap measures the price difference between Bitcoin on Coinbase and Binance, with a negative gap suggesting growing selling pressure. According to analysts, the decline highlights a potential reduction in institutional activity, with the latest figures revealing a shift in market dynamics.

Weaker Demand for Bitcoin on Coinbase

The Coinbase Premium Gap, which tracks the difference in Bitcoin’s price on Coinbase and Binance, has dropped to -167.8, its lowest level since December 2024. The metric reflects a negative gap when Bitcoin’s price on Coinbase is lower than on Binance. This shift points to weaker demand on Coinbase-linked platforms, which are generally associated with institutional investors.

CryptoQuant analyst Darkfost commented, “The selling pressure is intensifying on the institutional side.” This suggests that institutional players, who typically trade on Coinbase’s Advanced Trade platform, may be offloading Bitcoin at lower premiums. As a result, the selling activity of institutional investors could be driving Bitcoin’s price down, creating this negative gap.

Coinbase Premium Gap Suggests Decreased Institutional Activity

The Coinbase Premium Gap has steadily declined since mid-October 2025, showing a sharp acceleration over the past week. This decreasing trend suggests a reduction in the interest of institutional investors, whose activity often drives higher premiums. CryptoQuant pointed out that, in this uncertain market, institutions may be scaling back on riskier investments such as Bitcoin.

In its latest report, CryptoQuant highlighted that the reversal in institutional demand is substantial. The firm noted that US spot exchange-traded funds (ETFs), which had bought over 46,000 BTC last year, are now net sellers. In 2026, these ETFs have sold more than 10,600 BTC, contributing to persistent selling pressure in the market.

Bitcoin ETFs See Outflows, Adding to Selling Pressure

Recent data from CryptoQuant shows that Bitcoin ETFs have experienced $1.2 billion in outflows over the past week. These outflows reflect the broader trend of decreasing institutional demand, which has put additional pressure on Bitcoin’s price. As Bitcoin dipped to a 15-month low below $71,000, the ongoing ETF outflows continue to add to the negative gap.

With institutional investors retreating from the market, the Coinbase Premium Gap’s drop to its lowest level indicates the weakening appetite for Bitcoin among professional investors. CryptoQuant also noted that the shift from buying to selling among these investors creates a “56,000 BTC demand gap” compared to last year, further exacerbating the pressure on Bitcoin’s price.

The post Coinbase Premium Gap Hits Yearly Low, Signaling Institutional Selling appeared first on CoinCentral.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
SEI Technical Analysis Feb 6

SEI Technical Analysis Feb 6

The post SEI Technical Analysis Feb 6 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SEI is consolidating at the $0.08 level under general downtrend pressure; although RSI
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/07 02:43
South Korean Crypto Exchange Accidentally Gave Away $95 Billion in Bitcoin

South Korean Crypto Exchange Accidentally Gave Away $95 Billion in Bitcoin

The post South Korean Crypto Exchange Accidentally Gave Away $95 Billion in Bitcoin appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief South Korean exchange Bithumb
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/07 02:16