Michael Burry, known for predicting the 2008 crisis, warns Bitcoin may replicate its 2021-2022 collapse pattern, potentially dropping to $50,000 or lower. The postMichael Burry, known for predicting the 2008 crisis, warns Bitcoin may replicate its 2021-2022 collapse pattern, potentially dropping to $50,000 or lower. The post

‘Big Short’ Michael Burry Warns Bitcoin May Repeat 2022 Collapse Pattern

2026/02/06 00:47
3 min read

Michael Burry, the investor who anticipated the 2008 mortgage crisis, issued a stark warning on February 5 about Bitcoin BTC $66 775 24h volatility: 8.0% Market cap: $1.33 T Vol. 24h: $115.13 B : the cryptocurrency could be replicating the 2021-2022 collapse pattern, which would imply an additional drop toward $50,000 or even lower.

Burry posted on X a comparative chart with the simple message “$BTC Patterns,” where he draws structural similarities between the current drop—from $126,000 to $70,000—and the previous brutal plunge that took Bitcoin from $35,000 to below $20,000.

Although Burry did not specify an exact price target, the visual implication is clear: if the pattern repeats, Bitcoin has room to fall to the $50,000 zone.

Burry’s warning doesn’t come out of nowhere. Just two days earlier, on February 3, he had published an extensive analysis on his Substack detailing why he believes Bitcoin is entering dangerous territory. According to Bloomberg, Burry warned that “sickening scenarios have now come within reach” if Bitcoin fell another 10% from early-week levels.

Burry was specific on something: such a drop would leave Strategy billions in the red with capital markets essentially closed. Beyond that, an additional drop toward $50,000 would not only devastate miners—many operate with tight margins that wouldn’t survive those prices—but would trigger cascading effects that could contaminate other markets.

Technical Analysis Suggests Further Downside

Bitcoin is currently trading at $67,274, down 8.15% in the last 24 hours. Technical indicators show a bearish trend firmly established, with multiple short signals activated across different timeframes. The chart reveals a descending price channel that has been driving the cryptocurrency lower since its all-time high near $126,000.

BTC price chart 1H | Source: TradingView

BTC price chart 1H | Source: TradingView

For Bitcoin to reach Burry’s $50,000 target, it would need to fall an additional 25% from current levels. The technical pattern visible on the chart suggests this scenario remains within the realm of possibility, particularly if the descending trend continues.

Short-term indicators including moving averages, momentum oscillators, and volume profiles all point to continued selling pressure, with resistance levels forming around $76,000 that could cap any potential recovery attempts.

Burry’s central thesis is that Bitcoin has been exposed as a purely speculative asset that failed to become a true hedge against monetary debasement. Unlike gold and silver, which have reached all-time highs amid geopolitical tensions and dollar concerns, Bitcoin has completely ignored those traditional catalysts.

Burry dismantles the argument that institutional adoption—through spot ETFs and corporate treasuries—will protect Bitcoin from severe corrections. He points out that approximately 200 public companies hold Bitcoin on their balance sheets, but this doesn’t guarantee stability because “there is nothing permanent about treasury assets.”

The big question dividing analysts is whether this historical pattern has real predictive validity. The 2021-2022 collapse occurred under very different conditions: aggressive Federal Reserve tightening, collapse of unsustainable retail leverage, and the implosion of platforms like Terra and FTX. Today the market has institutional ETFs, greater liquidity depth, and better regulatory infrastructure. But Burry seems to be betting that market psychology and technical patterns can repeat regardless of macro context.

next

The post ‘Big Short’ Michael Burry Warns Bitcoin May Repeat 2022 Collapse Pattern appeared first on Coinspeaker.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
SEI Technical Analysis Feb 6

SEI Technical Analysis Feb 6

The post SEI Technical Analysis Feb 6 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SEI is consolidating at the $0.08 level under general downtrend pressure; although RSI
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/07 02:43
South Korean Crypto Exchange Accidentally Gave Away $95 Billion in Bitcoin

South Korean Crypto Exchange Accidentally Gave Away $95 Billion in Bitcoin

The post South Korean Crypto Exchange Accidentally Gave Away $95 Billion in Bitcoin appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief South Korean exchange Bithumb
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/07 02:16