The White House is reportedly preparing an executive order that would penalize banks for dropping customers over political or ideological reasons, in a move aimed at curbing what conservatives and crypto firms have long called financial discrimination. A draft of the order, viewed by The Wall Street Journal , instructs bank regulators to investigate whether financial institutions have breached laws like the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, antitrust statutes or consumer protection rules. Banks found in violation could face fines, consent decrees or other penalties. Bank of America Case Resurfaces in Draft Order While the order does not name any specific banks, it references cases that have drawn political attention in recent years. Exclusive: The White House is preparing to step up pressure against big banks over perceived discrimination against conservatives and crypto companies with an executive order https://t.co/Flha5sPtCN — The Wall Street Journal (@WSJ) August 4, 2025 Among them is a 2023 accusation that Bank of America shut down the accounts of a Christian charity operating in Uganda, according to WSJ. The bank responded by saying the closure was due to its policy of not serving small businesses located overseas. The draft also takes issue with the role certain financial institutions played in federal investigations surrounding the Jan. 6 Capitol riots. It presses regulators to eliminate any internal policies that may have contributed to the exclusion of customers based on reputational or ideological concerns. The Journal reported that the order could be signed as soon as this week, though delays remain possible. Banks Cite Risk, AML Rules in Defense This issue of “de-banking” has been a longstanding complaint among conservative groups, which argue that their accounts and donations are often restricted or terminated without clear justification. Crypto firms have also raised alarm over what they see as unofficial pressure from regulators that has pushed banks to quietly cut ties with blockchain startups, particularly since the collapse of crypto-friendly institutions like Silvergate and Signature Bank. Banks, meanwhile, have defended these decisions as risk-based, citing compliance with anti-money-laundering regulations and federal scrutiny of emerging sectors like digital assets. They have pointed to existing regulatory frameworks that make onboarding crypto clients especially difficult, with heightened know-your-customer and transaction monitoring expectations. Banking Rules Face Shake-Up in Politicization Fight The draft order adds further pressure. It directs the Small Business Administration to examine how banks handle loan guarantees. This area is especially important for crypto startups and conservative nonprofit groups that rely on access to financial services. During President Trump’s presidency, banking regulators made a key policy change. They announced they would stop evaluating banks based on the reputational risks of their customers. Previously, banks had used this as a reason to avoid certain clients or industries. Additionally, the draft gives regulators the power to refer certain cases directly to the Department of Justice. In April, the Justice Department launched a task force in Virginia. This team was set up to investigate claims that banks had denied services or credit access based on impermissible factors. Though the draft is not yet final, it signals a broader federal effort. Critics say this effort aims to curb the growing politicization of financial services. If enacted, the order would mark a big moment in the ongoing debate over free speech, financial access and the role of banking institutions in a polarized political climate.The White House is reportedly preparing an executive order that would penalize banks for dropping customers over political or ideological reasons, in a move aimed at curbing what conservatives and crypto firms have long called financial discrimination. A draft of the order, viewed by The Wall Street Journal , instructs bank regulators to investigate whether financial institutions have breached laws like the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, antitrust statutes or consumer protection rules. Banks found in violation could face fines, consent decrees or other penalties. Bank of America Case Resurfaces in Draft Order While the order does not name any specific banks, it references cases that have drawn political attention in recent years. Exclusive: The White House is preparing to step up pressure against big banks over perceived discrimination against conservatives and crypto companies with an executive order https://t.co/Flha5sPtCN — The Wall Street Journal (@WSJ) August 4, 2025 Among them is a 2023 accusation that Bank of America shut down the accounts of a Christian charity operating in Uganda, according to WSJ. The bank responded by saying the closure was due to its policy of not serving small businesses located overseas. The draft also takes issue with the role certain financial institutions played in federal investigations surrounding the Jan. 6 Capitol riots. It presses regulators to eliminate any internal policies that may have contributed to the exclusion of customers based on reputational or ideological concerns. The Journal reported that the order could be signed as soon as this week, though delays remain possible. Banks Cite Risk, AML Rules in Defense This issue of “de-banking” has been a longstanding complaint among conservative groups, which argue that their accounts and donations are often restricted or terminated without clear justification. Crypto firms have also raised alarm over what they see as unofficial pressure from regulators that has pushed banks to quietly cut ties with blockchain startups, particularly since the collapse of crypto-friendly institutions like Silvergate and Signature Bank. Banks, meanwhile, have defended these decisions as risk-based, citing compliance with anti-money-laundering regulations and federal scrutiny of emerging sectors like digital assets. They have pointed to existing regulatory frameworks that make onboarding crypto clients especially difficult, with heightened know-your-customer and transaction monitoring expectations. Banking Rules Face Shake-Up in Politicization Fight The draft order adds further pressure. It directs the Small Business Administration to examine how banks handle loan guarantees. This area is especially important for crypto startups and conservative nonprofit groups that rely on access to financial services. During President Trump’s presidency, banking regulators made a key policy change. They announced they would stop evaluating banks based on the reputational risks of their customers. Previously, banks had used this as a reason to avoid certain clients or industries. Additionally, the draft gives regulators the power to refer certain cases directly to the Department of Justice. In April, the Justice Department launched a task force in Virginia. This team was set up to investigate claims that banks had denied services or credit access based on impermissible factors. Though the draft is not yet final, it signals a broader federal effort. Critics say this effort aims to curb the growing politicization of financial services. If enacted, the order would mark a big moment in the ongoing debate over free speech, financial access and the role of banking institutions in a polarized political climate.

Banks Could Face Fines for ‘De-Banking’ Crypto Firms Under White House Order: Report

The White House is reportedly preparing an executive order that would penalize banks for dropping customers over political or ideological reasons, in a move aimed at curbing what conservatives and crypto firms have long called financial discrimination.

A draft of the order, viewed by The Wall Street Journal, instructs bank regulators to investigate whether financial institutions have breached laws like the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, antitrust statutes or consumer protection rules.

Banks found in violation could face fines, consent decrees or other penalties.

Bank of America Case Resurfaces in Draft Order

While the order does not name any specific banks, it references cases that have drawn political attention in recent years.

Among them is a 2023 accusation that Bank of America shut down the accounts of a Christian charity operating in Uganda, according to WSJ. The bank responded by saying the closure was due to its policy of not serving small businesses located overseas.

The draft also takes issue with the role certain financial institutions played in federal investigations surrounding the Jan. 6 Capitol riots. It presses regulators to eliminate any internal policies that may have contributed to the exclusion of customers based on reputational or ideological concerns.

The Journal reported that the order could be signed as soon as this week, though delays remain possible.

Banks Cite Risk, AML Rules in Defense

This issue of “de-banking” has been a longstanding complaint among conservative groups, which argue that their accounts and donations are often restricted or terminated without clear justification.

Crypto firms have also raised alarm over what they see as unofficial pressure from regulators that has pushed banks to quietly cut ties with blockchain startups, particularly since the collapse of crypto-friendly institutions like Silvergate and Signature Bank.

Banks, meanwhile, have defended these decisions as risk-based, citing compliance with anti-money-laundering regulations and federal scrutiny of emerging sectors like digital assets.

They have pointed to existing regulatory frameworks that make onboarding crypto clients especially difficult, with heightened know-your-customer and transaction monitoring expectations.

Banking Rules Face Shake-Up in Politicization Fight

The draft order adds further pressure. It directs the Small Business Administration to examine how banks handle loan guarantees. This area is especially important for crypto startups and conservative nonprofit groups that rely on access to financial services.

During President Trump’s presidency, banking regulators made a key policy change. They announced they would stop evaluating banks based on the reputational risks of their customers. Previously, banks had used this as a reason to avoid certain clients or industries.

Additionally, the draft gives regulators the power to refer certain cases directly to the Department of Justice. In April, the Justice Department launched a task force in Virginia. This team was set up to investigate claims that banks had denied services or credit access based on impermissible factors.

Though the draft is not yet final, it signals a broader federal effort. Critics say this effort aims to curb the growing politicization of financial services.

If enacted, the order would mark a big moment in the ongoing debate over free speech, financial access and the role of banking institutions in a polarized political climate.

Market Opportunity
LETSTOP Logo
LETSTOP Price(STOP)
$0.01522
$0.01522$0.01522
-2.74%
USD
LETSTOP (STOP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Gold hits yet another new all-time high of $4,740 as Bitcoin crashes to $91,000

Gold hits yet another new all-time high of $4,740 as Bitcoin crashes to $91,000

The post Gold hits yet another new all-time high of $4,740 as Bitcoin crashes to $91,000 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Gold futures pushed to a new all time
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/20 14:04
CLARITY Act Gains Support as Bitcoin Policy Momentum Builds

CLARITY Act Gains Support as Bitcoin Policy Momentum Builds

The post CLARITY Act Gains Support as Bitcoin Policy Momentum Builds appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The crypto regulation in the United States has gained momentum ahead of midterm elections in 2026. Satoshi Action Fund CEO has promised a massive Bitcoin announcement that may change crypto adoption optics. The Clarity Act has already received minimum required support from the Democratic Senators. Crypto regulation in the U.S. is picking up speed heading into the 2026 midterms. The Satoshi Action Fund, led by Dennis Porter, has ramped up lobbying efforts in Washington D.C., pushing lawmakers to prioritize the CLARITY Act. Porter also teased that a “massive” Bitcoin announcement is coming next week; one he claims could change the trajectory of Bitcoin adoption in the U.S.  Industry voices are urging traders to watch closely. Benjamin Aaron Semchee, chairman of Averliz, told followers that Porter’s call deserves attention, underscoring how policy shifts could hit markets fast. What Crypto Regulations Are Expected from Washington D.C? Building on the GENIUS Act The U.S. lawmakers came together from both major parties to pass the GENIUS Act, which focuses on stablecoins as a form of payment.  With the country’s labor data having revealed weakness, lawmakers are now more keen than ever to tap into the emerging technologies to create new and higher paying jobs. Bipartisan Push for the CLARITY Act Momentum is now behind the CLARITY Act, which aims to overhaul crypto market structure rules. On Friday, 12 Democratic Senators, led by Senator Ruben Gallego, reaffirmed their intent to work across the aisle. “We hope our Republican colleagues will agree to a bipartisan authorship process, as is the norm for legislation of this scale. Given our shared interest in moving forward quickly on this issue, we hope they will agree to reasonable requests to allow for true collaboration,” the Dem Senators noted. Related: Ray Dalio Warns of US ‘Economic Heart Attack’ From Debt, Sees…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/20 21:02
Goddess of Wealth Jailed for $7.2 Billion Crypto Scam Targeting Thousands

Goddess of Wealth Jailed for $7.2 Billion Crypto Scam Targeting Thousands

Zhimin Qian jailed in UK for $7.2B crypto scam targeting 128,000 victims; 61,000 Bitcoin seized in record-breaking operation. Zhimin Qian, also known as Yadi Zhang
Share
LiveBitcoinNews2026/01/20 14:00