The White House is reportedly preparing an executive order that would penalize banks for dropping customers over political or ideological reasons, in a move aimed at curbing what conservatives and crypto firms have long called financial discrimination. A draft of the order, viewed by The Wall Street Journal , instructs bank regulators to investigate whether financial institutions have breached laws like the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, antitrust statutes or consumer protection rules. Banks found in violation could face fines, consent decrees or other penalties. Bank of America Case Resurfaces in Draft Order While the order does not name any specific banks, it references cases that have drawn political attention in recent years. Exclusive: The White House is preparing to step up pressure against big banks over perceived discrimination against conservatives and crypto companies with an executive order https://t.co/Flha5sPtCN — The Wall Street Journal (@WSJ) August 4, 2025 Among them is a 2023 accusation that Bank of America shut down the accounts of a Christian charity operating in Uganda, according to WSJ. The bank responded by saying the closure was due to its policy of not serving small businesses located overseas. The draft also takes issue with the role certain financial institutions played in federal investigations surrounding the Jan. 6 Capitol riots. It presses regulators to eliminate any internal policies that may have contributed to the exclusion of customers based on reputational or ideological concerns. The Journal reported that the order could be signed as soon as this week, though delays remain possible. Banks Cite Risk, AML Rules in Defense This issue of “de-banking” has been a longstanding complaint among conservative groups, which argue that their accounts and donations are often restricted or terminated without clear justification. Crypto firms have also raised alarm over what they see as unofficial pressure from regulators that has pushed banks to quietly cut ties with blockchain startups, particularly since the collapse of crypto-friendly institutions like Silvergate and Signature Bank. Banks, meanwhile, have defended these decisions as risk-based, citing compliance with anti-money-laundering regulations and federal scrutiny of emerging sectors like digital assets. They have pointed to existing regulatory frameworks that make onboarding crypto clients especially difficult, with heightened know-your-customer and transaction monitoring expectations. Banking Rules Face Shake-Up in Politicization Fight The draft order adds further pressure. It directs the Small Business Administration to examine how banks handle loan guarantees. This area is especially important for crypto startups and conservative nonprofit groups that rely on access to financial services. During President Trump’s presidency, banking regulators made a key policy change. They announced they would stop evaluating banks based on the reputational risks of their customers. Previously, banks had used this as a reason to avoid certain clients or industries. Additionally, the draft gives regulators the power to refer certain cases directly to the Department of Justice. In April, the Justice Department launched a task force in Virginia. This team was set up to investigate claims that banks had denied services or credit access based on impermissible factors. Though the draft is not yet final, it signals a broader federal effort. Critics say this effort aims to curb the growing politicization of financial services. If enacted, the order would mark a big moment in the ongoing debate over free speech, financial access and the role of banking institutions in a polarized political climate.The White House is reportedly preparing an executive order that would penalize banks for dropping customers over political or ideological reasons, in a move aimed at curbing what conservatives and crypto firms have long called financial discrimination. A draft of the order, viewed by The Wall Street Journal , instructs bank regulators to investigate whether financial institutions have breached laws like the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, antitrust statutes or consumer protection rules. Banks found in violation could face fines, consent decrees or other penalties. Bank of America Case Resurfaces in Draft Order While the order does not name any specific banks, it references cases that have drawn political attention in recent years. Exclusive: The White House is preparing to step up pressure against big banks over perceived discrimination against conservatives and crypto companies with an executive order https://t.co/Flha5sPtCN — The Wall Street Journal (@WSJ) August 4, 2025 Among them is a 2023 accusation that Bank of America shut down the accounts of a Christian charity operating in Uganda, according to WSJ. The bank responded by saying the closure was due to its policy of not serving small businesses located overseas. The draft also takes issue with the role certain financial institutions played in federal investigations surrounding the Jan. 6 Capitol riots. It presses regulators to eliminate any internal policies that may have contributed to the exclusion of customers based on reputational or ideological concerns. The Journal reported that the order could be signed as soon as this week, though delays remain possible. Banks Cite Risk, AML Rules in Defense This issue of “de-banking” has been a longstanding complaint among conservative groups, which argue that their accounts and donations are often restricted or terminated without clear justification. Crypto firms have also raised alarm over what they see as unofficial pressure from regulators that has pushed banks to quietly cut ties with blockchain startups, particularly since the collapse of crypto-friendly institutions like Silvergate and Signature Bank. Banks, meanwhile, have defended these decisions as risk-based, citing compliance with anti-money-laundering regulations and federal scrutiny of emerging sectors like digital assets. They have pointed to existing regulatory frameworks that make onboarding crypto clients especially difficult, with heightened know-your-customer and transaction monitoring expectations. Banking Rules Face Shake-Up in Politicization Fight The draft order adds further pressure. It directs the Small Business Administration to examine how banks handle loan guarantees. This area is especially important for crypto startups and conservative nonprofit groups that rely on access to financial services. During President Trump’s presidency, banking regulators made a key policy change. They announced they would stop evaluating banks based on the reputational risks of their customers. Previously, banks had used this as a reason to avoid certain clients or industries. Additionally, the draft gives regulators the power to refer certain cases directly to the Department of Justice. In April, the Justice Department launched a task force in Virginia. This team was set up to investigate claims that banks had denied services or credit access based on impermissible factors. Though the draft is not yet final, it signals a broader federal effort. Critics say this effort aims to curb the growing politicization of financial services. If enacted, the order would mark a big moment in the ongoing debate over free speech, financial access and the role of banking institutions in a polarized political climate.

Banks Could Face Fines for ‘De-Banking’ Crypto Firms Under White House Order: Report

The White House is reportedly preparing an executive order that would penalize banks for dropping customers over political or ideological reasons, in a move aimed at curbing what conservatives and crypto firms have long called financial discrimination.

A draft of the order, viewed by The Wall Street Journal, instructs bank regulators to investigate whether financial institutions have breached laws like the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, antitrust statutes or consumer protection rules.

Banks found in violation could face fines, consent decrees or other penalties.

Bank of America Case Resurfaces in Draft Order

While the order does not name any specific banks, it references cases that have drawn political attention in recent years.

Among them is a 2023 accusation that Bank of America shut down the accounts of a Christian charity operating in Uganda, according to WSJ. The bank responded by saying the closure was due to its policy of not serving small businesses located overseas.

The draft also takes issue with the role certain financial institutions played in federal investigations surrounding the Jan. 6 Capitol riots. It presses regulators to eliminate any internal policies that may have contributed to the exclusion of customers based on reputational or ideological concerns.

The Journal reported that the order could be signed as soon as this week, though delays remain possible.

Banks Cite Risk, AML Rules in Defense

This issue of “de-banking” has been a longstanding complaint among conservative groups, which argue that their accounts and donations are often restricted or terminated without clear justification.

Crypto firms have also raised alarm over what they see as unofficial pressure from regulators that has pushed banks to quietly cut ties with blockchain startups, particularly since the collapse of crypto-friendly institutions like Silvergate and Signature Bank.

Banks, meanwhile, have defended these decisions as risk-based, citing compliance with anti-money-laundering regulations and federal scrutiny of emerging sectors like digital assets.

They have pointed to existing regulatory frameworks that make onboarding crypto clients especially difficult, with heightened know-your-customer and transaction monitoring expectations.

Banking Rules Face Shake-Up in Politicization Fight

The draft order adds further pressure. It directs the Small Business Administration to examine how banks handle loan guarantees. This area is especially important for crypto startups and conservative nonprofit groups that rely on access to financial services.

During President Trump’s presidency, banking regulators made a key policy change. They announced they would stop evaluating banks based on the reputational risks of their customers. Previously, banks had used this as a reason to avoid certain clients or industries.

Additionally, the draft gives regulators the power to refer certain cases directly to the Department of Justice. In April, the Justice Department launched a task force in Virginia. This team was set up to investigate claims that banks had denied services or credit access based on impermissible factors.

Though the draft is not yet final, it signals a broader federal effort. Critics say this effort aims to curb the growing politicization of financial services.

If enacted, the order would mark a big moment in the ongoing debate over free speech, financial access and the role of banking institutions in a polarized political climate.

Market Opportunity
LETSTOP Logo
LETSTOP Price(STOP)
$0.01582
$0.01582$0.01582
-5.09%
USD
LETSTOP (STOP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Wealthfront Corporation (WLTH) Shareholders Who Lost Money – Contact Law Offices of Howard G. Smith About Securities Fraud Investigation

Wealthfront Corporation (WLTH) Shareholders Who Lost Money – Contact Law Offices of Howard G. Smith About Securities Fraud Investigation

BENSALEM, Pa.–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Law Offices of Howard G. Smith announces an investigation on behalf of Wealthfront Corporation (“Wealthfront” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ
Share
AI Journal2026/01/21 05:30
Polygon Tops RWA Rankings With $1.1B in Tokenized Assets

Polygon Tops RWA Rankings With $1.1B in Tokenized Assets

The post Polygon Tops RWA Rankings With $1.1B in Tokenized Assets appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Notes A new report from Dune and RWA.xyz highlights Polygon’s role in the growing RWA sector. Polygon PoS currently holds $1.13 billion in RWA Total Value Locked (TVL) across 269 assets. The network holds a 62% market share of tokenized global bonds, driven by European money market funds. The Polygon POL $0.25 24h volatility: 1.4% Market cap: $2.64 B Vol. 24h: $106.17 M network is securing a significant position in the rapidly growing tokenization space, now holding over $1.13 billion in total value locked (TVL) from Real World Assets (RWAs). This development comes as the network continues to evolve, recently deploying its major “Rio” upgrade on the Amoy testnet to enhance future scaling capabilities. This information comes from a new joint report on the state of the RWA market published on Sept. 17 by blockchain analytics firm Dune and data platform RWA.xyz. The focus on RWAs is intensifying across the industry, coinciding with events like the ongoing Real-World Asset Summit in New York. Sandeep Nailwal, CEO of the Polygon Foundation, highlighted the findings via a post on X, noting that the TVL is spread across 269 assets and 2,900 holders on the Polygon PoS chain. The Dune and https://t.co/W6WSFlHoQF report on RWA is out and it shows that RWA is happening on Polygon. Here are a few highlights: – Leading in Global Bonds: Polygon holds 62% share of tokenized global bonds (driven by Spiko’s euro MMF and Cashlink euro issues) – Spiko U.S.… — Sandeep | CEO, Polygon Foundation (※,※) (@sandeepnailwal) September 17, 2025 Key Trends From the 2025 RWA Report The joint publication, titled “RWA REPORT 2025,” offers a comprehensive look into the tokenized asset landscape, which it states has grown 224% since the start of 2024. The report identifies several key trends driving this expansion. According to…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:40
VIRGINIA BEACH’S LANDSTOWN COMMONS ACQUIRED FOR $102 MILLION BY AN AFFILIATE OF YALE REALTY SERVICES CORP.

VIRGINIA BEACH’S LANDSTOWN COMMONS ACQUIRED FOR $102 MILLION BY AN AFFILIATE OF YALE REALTY SERVICES CORP.

First-in-Class Retail Plaza, Located in Prime Area Appeals with Demographic Diversity, High Employment Rate, Military and Vacation Population WHITE PLAINS, N.Y.,
Share
AI Journal2026/01/21 05:28