The post A commodity without a market: the hazelnut shock appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. I’m convinced that Nutella is the second most important inventionThe post A commodity without a market: the hazelnut shock appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. I’m convinced that Nutella is the second most important invention

A commodity without a market: the hazelnut shock

I’m convinced that Nutella is the second most important invention after the wheel. So yes, I’m an unapologetic hazelnut fan.

That said, a few months ago I started to notice something odd. The price of natural hazelnuts had more or less doubled. Shortly after, they became surprisingly hard to find, at least in supermarkets where they had always been readily available.

That caught my attention. And it made me wonder whether something unusual had happened, or was still unfolding, in the hazelnut market.

Hazelnuts: a commodity shock without a market

Hazelnuts are a small commodity with an unusually concentrated supply chain. Around 70% of global production comes from Turkey, with output overwhelmingly concentrated in the Black Sea region, where soil, rainfall and climate conditions are uniquely well suited to hazelnut trees. Few agricultural commodities display such geographic dependence.

That concentration extends beyond geography into labour. Roughly 600,000 farmers grow hazelnuts in Turkey, mostly on small, family-owned plots. Including processing, logistics and trade, an estimated five million people are directly or indirectly involved in the hazelnut economy. Production is fragmented, local and labour-intensive, a structure that shapes how the market functions in times of stress.

An opaque market by design

Hazelnuts do not trade on any major agricultural exchange. There are no futures contracts, no central clearing, and no benchmark price. Transactions are negotiated directly, often verbally, between farmers, wholesalers and exporters. Prices are quite literally “called on the phone”.

This makes the market largely inaccessible to non-commercial participants and almost invisible from a traditional commodity-market perspective. Yet physical supply and demand still clear, and when supply is disrupted, prices can move violently.

A rare but severe supply shock

In April 2025, hazelnut growers along Turkey’s Black Sea coast woke up to the worst possible surprise: a late frost sweeping through the region. Frosts like this are rare, maybe once a decade, but this one landed at exactly the wrong moment.

The spring had been unusually warm, pushing hazelnut trees to bud and flower earlier than normal. When temperatures suddenly dropped, the trees were completely exposed. The damage was immediate and widespread. Early estimates suggest around one-third of Turkey’s hazelnut crop was wiped out in a matter of days.

And the frost was only part of the story. Turkish growers had already been dealing with mounting pressures. The brown marmorated stink bug, which arrived in the country around 2017, has become a persistent threat, capable of destroying 10–20% of output in bad years. On top of that, the summer of 2024 was the hottest and driest in more than 60 years, leaving trees stressed and less resilient going into the 2025 season.

By the time the frost hit, the crop had little margin for error, and the market has been paying the price ever since.

Taken together, the result is a severe imbalance: available supply in 2025 is likely to meet only about half of global demand.

How prices behave without a benchmark

History provides a guide to what happens next. Following similar frost events in 2004 and 2014, hazelnut prices more than tripled. In the 2014 episode, prices began rising immediately after the frost in March, peaked in late April to early May 2015, and then fell by roughly 50% within one to two months as demand adjusted and inventories were released.

Hazelnut prices after major frost events (stylised, pre-frost = 100) (Prices are indicative and based on historical patterns rather than exchange-traded data)

Chart 1 illustrates this typical pattern by using a stylised price index. The spike is sharp, front-loaded and driven by physical scarcity rather than speculative positioning. The subsequent correction reflects demand rationing rather than a recovery in supply.

A problem with the structure of the supply

When the price of hazelnuts goes up, supply doesn’t rush in to meet it. There is no easy answer. It takes years for hazelnut trees to grow up, you can’t plant new orchards overnight, and there aren’t many other countries that can grow them. Most of the production still comes from small, family-run farms that don’t have much access to capital and can’t grow even when prices are high.

Because of this rigidity, shocks in the hazelnut market tend to look awful. The market doesn’t make small changes; instead, it swings suddenly: prices go up, volumes go down, and buyers have to adapt on the fly.

Hazelnuts: estimated 2025 supply vs demand (illustrative index)

Chart 2 captures the core of the current problem: demand remains broadly intact, but supply has been structurally impaired.

A market that matters, even though it’s hard to see

Hazelnuts may not be in the world of futures contracts and electronic trading screens, but they are an important part of the global food supply chain. There is steady demand for spreads, chocolates, biscuits, and baked goods, and it will be hard to find something else to fill the gap in the short term.

Combine that demand with a highly concentrated production base, rising climate volatility and biological risks, and the result is a market that is unusually fragile. When something goes wrong, there are few buffers, and the adjustment is sudden, not smooth.

The lesson from 2025 is not just about hazelnuts. It is about how physical commodities behave when there is no buffer of inventories, no financial market to absorb shocks, and no rapid supply response. In such markets, scarcity does not emerge gradually; it arrives all at once.

Source: https://www.fxstreet.com/news/are-you-hazel-nuts-202602011312

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 7, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — HitPaw, a leader in AI-powered visual enhancement solutions, announced Comfy, a global content creation platform, is
Share
AI Journal2026/02/08 09:15
Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

A Journalist gave a brutal review of the new Melania documentary, which has been criticized by those who say it won't make back the huge fees spent to make it,
Share
Rawstory2026/02/08 09:08
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00