PANews reported on January 31st that, according to Jinshi, institutional analysis suggests that Friday's sharp drop in gold prices may have been accelerated by PANews reported on January 31st that, according to Jinshi, institutional analysis suggests that Friday's sharp drop in gold prices may have been accelerated by

Analysis: The precipitous drop in gold prices may be exacerbated by a "gamma squeeze".

2026/01/31 16:02
News Brief
**PANews** noted on January 31st that Friday's dramatic gold selloff likely stemmed from what analysts call a "gamma squeeze." Here's how it works: when prices breach key option strike points, those holding short positions must purchase additional futures or ETF shares to rebalance their holdings. Then, as prices retreat below those thresholds, they sell again—creating a self-reinforcing cycle. Heavy trading centered around SPDR Gold ETF strikes at $465.00 and $455.00 that expired Friday. Meanwhile, substantial open interest in CME's March and April contracts clustered near $5,300.00, $5,200.00, and $5,100.00. Consequently, this mechanical hedging intensified the downward momentum considerably.

PANews reported on January 31st that, according to Jinshi, institutional analysis suggests that Friday's sharp drop in gold prices may have been accelerated by a so-called "gamma squeeze." This occurs when prices break through a large number of option open interest levels, requiring traders holding short option positions to buy more futures (or gold ETF shares) to balance their portfolios, and then selling when prices fall back below these levels. For the SPDR Gold ETF, a large number of options with strike prices at $465 and $455 expired on Friday, while CME Group's March and April options also had significant open interest concentrated at the $5300, $5200, and $5100 levels.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Witness Bitcoin’s Dramatic Plunge in A Volatile Crypto Market

Witness Bitcoin’s Dramatic Plunge in A Volatile Crypto Market

The new Fed chairman and geopolitical risks affect cryptocurrency outlook. Bitcoin fails to maintain key levels, hitting lowest since October 2023. Continue
Share
Coinstats2026/02/01 03:04
Smart Money Accumulates SUI as Weekly Chart Signals Expansion Phase Ahead

Smart Money Accumulates SUI as Weekly Chart Signals Expansion Phase Ahead

TLDR: SUI preserves its long-term ascending channel, signaling macro strength despite deep corrective phases  Sell-side liquidity sweeps near trendline support
Share
Blockonomi2026/02/01 03:25