U.K.’s advertising watchdog has banned a Coinbase campaign that allegedly downplayed the risks of crypto investing and touted the exchange as a solution to the U.K.’s advertising watchdog has banned a Coinbase campaign that allegedly downplayed the risks of crypto investing and touted the exchange as a solution to the

UK ad watchdog bans Coinbase campaign for trivializing crypto investment risks

2026/01/28 15:45
3 min read

U.K.’s advertising watchdog has banned a Coinbase campaign that allegedly downplayed the risks of crypto investing and touted the exchange as a solution to the country’s cost-of-living crisis.

Summary
  • The U.K. Advertising Standards Authority banned Coinbase’s “Everything is Fine” campaign, alleging that it trivialised crypto investment risks.
  • Regulators said the ads ran without mandatory risk warnings across online platforms and high-traffic public spaces.

According to the U.K. Advertising Standards Authority, the advertisements were deemed “irresponsible” and “trivialized the risks of cryptocurrency,” The Guardian reported on Wednesday.

Coinbase first released the two-minute ad in July last year, with the video featuring satirical musical scenes of cheerful citizens singing slogans like “everything is just fine, everything is grand,” as their homes fall into disrepair and suffer power outages against the backdrop of a city littered with overflowing bins and rats.

The video ends with a cut to the line “If everything’s fine, don’t change anything” before transitioning to the Coinbase logo.

“We considered that using humour to reference serious financial concerns, alongside a cue to ‘change,’ risked presenting complex, high-risk financial products as an easy or obvious response to those concerns,” the ASA told Coinbase’s global advisory council.

The advertisement had already been rejected by Clearcast, the body responsible for vetting TV commercials in the U.K., on grounds that it presented crypto as a “potential solution to economic challenges, without sufficient evidence for this claim.”

However, the ASA said it was still widely circulated online across multiple platforms, alongside three posters that were displayed in high-traffic areas such as the London Underground and rail stations.

Further, the ASA said the ads failed to include any risk warnings, especially given that the Financial Conduct Authority has mandated that crypto promotions must be labeled with prominent risk disclosures.

A Coinbase spokesperson defended the campaign, stating that the video was intended to “provoke discussion about the state of the financial system and the need to consider better futures” and not to offer simplistic solutions or mislead viewers.

“While we respect the ASA’s decision, we fundamentally disagree with the characterisation of a campaign that critically reflects widely reported economic conditions as socially irresponsible,” the spokesperson said, adding that Coinbase believes “responsible adoption can play a constructive role in a more efficient and freer financial system.”

UK targets ads as crypto ownership falls

The Advertising Standards Authority has a long history of clamping down on crypto-related promotions it deems misleading and has banned similar campaigns from other platforms in the past.

Crypto exchange Coinfloor was among the first to see its ads pulled, including one featuring a pensioner’s testimonial, which the regulator said at the time violated the country’s advertising code and misled a particular target audience.

Subsequently, in 2022, the ASA took down Facebook ads promoting non-fungible tokens run by Crypto.com and Turtle United for failing to adequately outline the risks involved.

Regulators like the Financial Conduct Authority are working on finalizing a framework for cryptocurrencies in the country. However, the cautious stance taken by U.K. authorities has coincided with a noticeable drop in retail crypto ownership, which fell from 12% in 2024 to 8% in 2025.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Future of Metalworking: Advancements and Innovations

The Future of Metalworking: Advancements and Innovations

The demand for precision and efficiency in manufacturing processes continues to rise, leading to groundbreaking advancements in metalworking. This sector constantly
Share
Techbullion2026/02/07 19:24
Crypto whale loses $6M to sneaky phishing scheme targeting staked Ethereum

Crypto whale loses $6M to sneaky phishing scheme targeting staked Ethereum

The post Crypto whale loses $6M to sneaky phishing scheme targeting staked Ethereum appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A crypto whale lost more than $6 million in staked Ethereum (stETH) and Aave-wrapped Bitcoin (aEthWBTC) after approving malicious signatures in a phishing scheme on Sept. 18, according to blockchain security firm Scam Sniffer. According to the firm, the attackers disguised their move as a routine wallet confirmation through “Permit” signatures, which tricked the victim into authorizing fund transfers without triggering obvious red flags. Yu Xian, founder of blockchain security company SlowMist, noted that the victim did not recognize the danger because the transaction required no gas fees. He wrote: “From the victim’s perspective, he just clicked a few times to confirm the wallet’s pop-up signature requests, didn’t spend a single penny of gas, and $6.28 million was gone.” How Permit exploits work Permit approvals were originally designed to simplify token transfers. Instead of submitting an on-chain approval and paying fees, a user can sign an off-chain message authorizing a spender. That efficiency, however, has created a new attack surface for malicious players. Once a user signs such a permit, attackers can combine two functions—Permit and TransferFrom—to drain assets directly. Because the authorization takes place off-chain, wallet dashboards show no unusual activity until the funds move. As a result, the assets are gone when the approval executes on-chain, and tokens are redirected to the attacker’s wallet. This loophole has made permit exploits increasingly attractive for malicious actors, who can siphon millions without needing complex hacks or high-cost gas wars. Phishing losses The latest theft highlights a wider trend of escalating phishing campaigns. Scam Sniffer reported that in August alone, attackers stole $12.17 million from more than 15,200 victims. That figure represented a 72% jump in losses compared with July. According to the firm, the most significant share of August’s damages came from three large accounts that accounted for nearly half…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/19 02:31
WHALE ALERT: $351 MILLION Bitcoin Dump Incoming

WHALE ALERT: $351 MILLION Bitcoin Dump Incoming

One crypto whale transferred 5,000 Bitcoin, which is worth about 351 million, to Binance. Ash Crypto reported this transfer. It happened only several days after
Share
Coinfomania2026/02/07 19:36