The post LIT Technical Analysis Jan 28 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. LIT is currently trading at $1.91 and is in a bullish position above the short-term The post LIT Technical Analysis Jan 28 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. LIT is currently trading at $1.91 and is in a bullish position above the short-term

LIT Technical Analysis Jan 28

LIT is currently trading at $1.91 and is in a bullish position above the short-term EMA20 ($0.76). However, the Supertrend’s bearish signal and the $1.27 resistance form critical thresholds to watch in upward movements.

Current Price Position and Critical Levels

LIT has been following a sideways trend in the $1.80-$2.00 range with a 3.03% rise over the last 24 hours. RSI at 48.64 is in the neutral zone, while the price being above EMA20 indicates short-term bullish momentum. However, the overall market structure is dominated by a sideways trend, and 17 strong levels have been identified across 1D/3D/1W timeframes (1D: 3 supports/4 resistances, 3D: 2S/2R, 1W: 5S/3R). The price has reached $1.91 by breaking recent resistances (around $1.15), but BTC’s downtrend and Supertrend bearish resistance ($1.27) could trigger pullbacks. Liquidity accumulation zones are concentrated below, while the $2.00 psychological level above awaits testing. This position shows buyer strength, but it’s risky without proximity to higher timeframe supports.

Support Levels: Buyer Zones

Primary Support

$0.5210 (Strength Score: 76/100) – This level stands out as a strong order block and demand zone on the 1W timeframe. Historically tested three times, each with high volume rejection and bounces (e.g., 25% recovery in the last 3 months). Confluence with EMA50 intersection on the 3D chart, POC (Point of Control) on volume profile. With multi-timeframe confirmation (1D/1W), liquidity pool is concentrated here; a break leads to $0.3868 and triggers the bearish scenario. Ideal entry zone for buyers, stop-loss below $0.50.

Secondary Support and Stop Levels

$0.6371 (71/100) – Secondary support, aligned with the latest swing low and FVG (Fair Value Gap) on 1D. Two high-volume tests (total 15% bounce), RSI divergence observed. Confluence with 0.618 Fibonacci retracement on 3D, supported by volume spikes. Invalidation below $0.60; this is a protective buyer zone.
$0.3868 (69/100) – Deep support, 1W demand zone and monthly low. Single test but ultra-high volume, breaker block transformation. Multi-TF confluence low but liquidity accumulation area. A break activates the -$0.7752 downside target (R/R ratio 1:3+). Stop level $0.37.

Resistance Levels: Seller Zones

Near-Term Resistances

$1.0305 (71/100) – Short-term resistance, 1D supply zone and latest rejection point. Price broke it at $1.91 but expect a retest; volume decrease and wick formations present. Confluence with EMA20 dynamic resistance, first obstacle on the way to Supertrend $1.27.
$0.9103 (77/100) – Highest near-term resistance score, 3D breaker and historical high. 10%+ drops on three tests, high short liquidity. Being above price shows flip potential, but BTC pressure makes retest likely.

Main Resistance and Targets

$1.1507 (72/100) – Main resistance, 1W supply block and 0.786 Fib extension. Two high-volume rejections, order flow imbalance. A break opens the path to $2.00, psychological target. Multi-TF (1D/3D) confluence high; invalidation above $1.20. No upside target but $2.50 possible with momentum, R/R 1:2.5.

Liquidity Map and Big Players

Big players (smart money) are accumulating long positions at $0.52-$0.63 supports; equal highs/lows set traps for liquidity sweeps. Above, $1.15-$1.27 range has short liquidity with high stop hunt potential. Per volume profile, $0.91 is POC, imbalance carrying upward. Price at $1.91 is clearing imbalance, but if BTC dominance rises and crushes alts, a raid to lower liquidity could come. Order blocks strong at supports, weak at resistances – bullish bias but caution advised.

Bitcoin Correlation

BTC in downtrend at $89,007, Supertrend bearish; supports at $88,355/$86,075. LIT highly correlated with BTC (+0.85); if BTC drops below $88k, LIT loses $1.15 resistance and pulls to $0.91. BTC $91k+ breakout triggers LIT $2.00+ rally. BTC dominance rise absorbs altcoin liquidity; if $89,190 resistance holds, LIT stays sideways. Key BTC levels: Watch $88,355 (LIT $1.27 test), $86k (LIT $0.63 sweep).

Trading Plan and Level-Based Strategy

Bullish Scenario: Hold above $1.91 targets $2.00, stop below $1.15. Long on $1.27 retest, EMA20 confluence. Ideal for LIT Spot Analysis.
Bearish Scenario: $1.91 break tests $1.15/$0.91, close shorts at deep support $0.52. BTC below $88k as trigger.
Neutral: Sideways $1.80-$2.00, range trade. LIT Futures Analysis for leverage. Always risk management: Position risk 1-2%, use invalidation levels. This level-based outlook changes with market conditions – not investment advice.

This analysis uses the market views and methodology of Chief Analyst Devrim Cacal.

Crypto Research Analyst: Michael Roberts

Blockchain technology and DeFi focused

This analysis is not investment advice. Do your own research.

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/analysis/lit-support-and-resistance-levels-critical-points-for-january-28-2026

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 7, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — HitPaw, a leader in AI-powered visual enhancement solutions, announced Comfy, a global content creation platform, is
Share
AI Journal2026/02/08 09:15
Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

A Journalist gave a brutal review of the new Melania documentary, which has been criticized by those who say it won't make back the huge fees spent to make it,
Share
Rawstory2026/02/08 09:08
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00