The post ZEC Technical Analysis Jan 27 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The positive course of the MACD histogram in ZEC and the price positioning above EMA20The post ZEC Technical Analysis Jan 27 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The positive course of the MACD histogram in ZEC and the price positioning above EMA20

ZEC Technical Analysis Jan 27

The positive course of the MACD histogram in ZEC and the price positioning above EMA20 give a hidden bull momentum signal within the sideways trend; however, Supertrend resistance and BTC pressure are noteworthy.

Trend Status and Momentum Analysis

ZEC is trading at the 396.62 dollar level as of January 27, 2026, and exhibited a strong 8.46% rise in the last 24 hours. The daily range was between 362.83-399.81 dollars, while volume reached 854.26 million dollars, confirming this movement. The overall trend can be described as sideways; the price is neither trapped in a clear bull channel nor in a bear market. However, momentum indicators point to building strength under this sideways movement. The price’s upward break above EMA20 (390.88 dollars) supports the short-term bull trend, while MACD’s bullish position shows momentum strengthening with the histogram’s positive expansion. The Supertrend indicator is still giving a bearish signal and pointing to 489.88 dollar resistance. In multi-timeframe (MTF) confluence, 15 strong levels were identified across 1D, 3D, and 1W charts: 1 support/5 resistances on 1D, 2 supports/1 resistance on 3D, 3 supports/4 resistances on 1W weighted. This structure highlights a 626.40 dollar target in upward breakouts and a 131.39 dollar bearish scenario downside. Volume increase confirms the recent rise, while the confluence of momentum oscillators suggests the sideways trend could turn bullish. Key support at 328.45 dollars (score 63/100), resistances at 442.28 (70/100), 549.93 (76/100), and 750.00 (66/100) dollar levels should be monitored. For detailed data, check ZEC Spot Analysis and ZEC Futures Analysis.

RSI Indicator: Buy or Sell?

RSI Divergence Analysis

RSI (14) is currently at 49.17 in the neutral zone; it gives neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30) signals. This reflects momentum in balance and a consolidation phase before a major breakout. No regular bullish divergence is observed in RSI with the recent price rise; while price makes higher lows, RSI stays at similar levels, which could indicate weak momentum but is neutralized by volume confirmation. There is potential for hidden bullish divergence: if RSI forms a higher low while price hits the 362.83 dollar low, it could be an early warning for trend reversal. Conversely, if bearish divergence forms (price higher high, RSI lower high), selling pressure may increase. At current levels, RSI supports continuation of the sideways trend, but a break above 50 is a buy signal, and below 40 indicates downside momentum.

Overbought/Oversold Regions

RSI at 49.17 maintains medium-term balance; even the 8.46% rally in the last 24 hours didn’t bring it close to 60, suggesting the rise could be sustainable. Gaining momentum without entering the overbought zone (70+) implies a healthy bull structure. The 30 level below is critical; a pullback there with volume decline would strengthen sell signals. RSI’s neutrality aligns with the EMA ribbon’s bull dynamics and enhances momentum confluence.

MACD Signals and Histogram Dynamics

MACD stands out as the strongest momentum signal source: in bullish status and supported by a positive histogram. The signal line crossover has occurred upward; histogram bars are expanding, confirming momentum acceleration. This shows sustained bull momentum above the zero line – the driving force behind the last 24-hour rise comes from here. Histogram contraction risk is low; if expansion continues with volume increase (854M dollars), a move toward resistances is expected. For a bearish crossover, the histogram must approach zero and break the signal line downward; the current positive structure prevents this. MACD divergence is negligible; aligned movement with price reinforces trend strength. In the short term, MACD emphasizes ZEC’s potential transition from sideways to bull.

EMA Systems and Trend Strength

Short-Term EMAs

Price is clearly above the 390.88 dollar EMA20; this proves the short-term trend is bullish. The ribbon narrowing between EMA10 and EMA50 has ended, with expansion favoring bulls. A pullback to EMA20 would be a support test; a break below would signal weakness. Short-term EMA dynamics show momentum strengthening in the sub-trend.

Medium/Long-Term EMA Supports

There may be support seeking around medium-term EMA50 and EMA100; a drop there would extend consolidation. Long-term EMA200 overlaps with 328 dollar support. The ribbon lacks a general bull slope but short-term dominance exists. Supertrend’s bearish status (489.88 resistance) limits the EMAs’ long-term strength; a breakout would form a full bull ribbon.

Bitcoin Correlation

BTC is at the 89,000 dollar level and rose only 1.21% in 24 hours while downtrend dominates; main supports at 88,314-85,129 dollars, resistances at 88,954-94,437 dollars. BTC Supertrend is bearish, dominance increase warns altcoins: ZEC’s recent rally appears independent of BTC but correlation is high. If BTC breaks below 88,314, ZEC’s 328 support test accelerates; above 91,000 opens room for ZEC’s 442-549 resistances. Altcoin rally requires BTC stabilization.

Momentum Outcome and Expectations

ZEC momentum is positive with MACD bullish histogram and price above EMA20; supported by RSI neutral balance. Bull signals are accumulating in the sideways trend, with strong volume confirmation. If upper resistance at 442 dollars breaks, it opens the path to 626 target; lower support at 328 must hold. Despite BTC bearish pressure, ZEC shows independent strength. Watch: RSI above 50, MACD expansion. Momentum confluence is turning bullish, cautious optimism.

This analysis uses Chief Analyst Devrim Cacal’s market views and methodology.

Market Analyst: Sarah Chen

Technical analysis and risk management specialist

This analysis is not investment advice. Do your own research.

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/analysis/zec-rsi-macd-analysis-january-27-2026-momentum-evaluation

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 7, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — HitPaw, a leader in AI-powered visual enhancement solutions, announced Comfy, a global content creation platform, is
Share
AI Journal2026/02/08 09:15
Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

A Journalist gave a brutal review of the new Melania documentary, which has been criticized by those who say it won't make back the huge fees spent to make it,
Share
Rawstory2026/02/08 09:08
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00