The post XLM Bearish Analysis Jan 27 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Stellar Lumens (XLM) is stuck around 0.21 dollars, testing critical support levels in The post XLM Bearish Analysis Jan 27 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Stellar Lumens (XLM) is stuck around 0.21 dollars, testing critical support levels in

XLM Bearish Analysis Jan 27

Stellar Lumens (XLM) is stuck around 0.21 dollars, testing critical support levels in the shadow of the daily downtrend. With RSI at 40.64 approaching oversold, Bitcoin’s bearish supertrend signal is creating additional pressure on altcoins – holding these levels could be key for a potential rebound.

Market Outlook and Current Situation

XLM is trading at the 0.21 dollar level with a slight 0.10% loss over the last 24 hours, with its intraday range limited to the 0.20-0.21 dollar band. Volume at 45.98 million dollars remains below average, reflecting Stellar’s weak momentum within the downtrend amid broader market consolidation. From a weekly perspective, XLM has not deepened its 15% drop over the past month but continues to stay below EMA20 (0.22 dollars), signaling bearish short-term momentum. This situation can be explained by the delay in altcoin season and the rising influence of Bitcoin dominance – payment-focused projects like XLM face liquidity issues during periods of low macro risk appetite.

According to multi-timeframe (MTF) confluence, a total of 14 strong levels were identified across 1D, 3D, and 1W charts: 2 supports/3 resistances on 1D, 1 support/2 resistances on 3D, and 2 supports/4 resistances on 1W. While this distribution indicates downtrend dominance, the high scores of nearby supports (70/100 and above) point to potential base formation. You can track more detailed price movements by checking the XLM Spot Analysis. Low market volume could pave the way for a volatility breakout; especially global regulation news or Stellar network updates could act as triggers.

In the broader market context, the momentum from XLM’s rally at the end of 2025 has completely dissipated. The correction since the 0.35 dollar peak in December 2025 has deepened by reaching the 61.8% Fibonacci retracement level (around 0.20 dollars). However, stable growth in network activity – with daily transaction volume exceeding 50 million – preserves the fundamental base and offers hope for technical recovery.

Technical Analysis: Levels to Watch

Support Zones

The most critical support is at 0.1942 dollars (score: 70/100), showing strong confluence on 1D and 1W timeframes. This level aligns with the horizontal trendline from November 2025 lows and has a high likelihood of holding on volume tests. Immediately above it, 0.2031 dollars (score: 69/100) serves as a secondary buffer; this aligns with the EMA50 on the 3D chart. A break of these supports could trigger acceleration toward the bearish target (0.1398 dollars), as lower MTF bands are open to freefall.

The strength of the support zones stems from repeated rebound buys in the past. For example, the V-shaped recovery seen at 0.1942 in October 2025 serves as a reference for a similar scenario. Investors should watch for volume spikes and long wick formations at these levels – in case of holding, a short-term short squeeze is possible.

Resistance Barriers

The first resistance is at 0.2119 dollars (score: 69/100), just above the current price and aligned with Supertrend resistance (0.24 dollars). A breakout opens the door to 0.2194 dollars (score: 61/100) and ultimately 0.2844 dollars (score: 64/100). These barriers are fueled by 3 strong resistances on 1D and 4 on 1W confluence, reinforcing the resilient structure of the downtrend.

The density of resistances is limiting upward moves; for example, without a close above 0.2119, the upper band of the bearish channel cannot be tested. The XLM Futures Analysis page highlights the liquidity hunt potential of these levels in leveraged trading. On long-term charts, 0.2844 plays a key role as the 38.2% Fibonacci of the 2024 rally.

Momentum Indicators and Trend Strength

RSI at 40.64 is in the neutral-bearish zone, approaching the oversold (30) threshold but without divergence signal – indicating continuation of the downtrend. MACD histogram is negative with a bearish line crossover; staying below the signal line confirms momentum loss. EMA hierarchy is disrupted: price is below EMA20 (0.22), with EMA50 (0.23) and EMA200 (0.25) acting as resistances. Supertrend gives a bearish signal, while ADX at 28 indicates moderate trend strength – no overheating, wide room for correction.

RSI divergence can be monitored on the 4H timeframe; weekly MACD histogram narrowing is laying the groundwork for a potential reversal. Bollinger Bands squeeze predicts volatility expansion – a break above the bands is bullish, below is bearish extension. Overall trend strength favors the downtrend supported by MTF confluence, but momentum indicators show weakness that could trigger short covering on support holds.

Risk Assessment and Trading Outlook

Bearish outlook dominates: if 0.1942 support breaks, the 0.1398 bearish target (score:22) exceeds a 1:2 risk/reward ratio. In the bullish scenario, the 0.3219 target (score:46) is valid only after a 0.2119 breakout, with R/R around 1:1.5. Risks include rising BTC dominance and low volume; opportunities arise from oversold RSI bounces. With low volatility, breakouts can be sharp – stop-losses should be set below supports, take-profits at resistances.

Market outlook is cautious: while the downtrend continues, support holds lead to sideways consolidation, breaks to extension. Long-term investors should monitor fundamental network growth (Stellar Consensus Protocol efficiency); short-term traders focus on MTF levels. Although overall R/R has shifted to bearish bias, both scenarios should be modeled for a balanced portfolio.

Bitcoin Correlation

XLM shows high correlation with BTC (%0.85+); BTC’s downtrend (88,399 dollars, +0.47% daily but supertrend bearish) is pressuring altcoins. If BTC loses 86,502 dollar support, XLM will see a parallel drop to 0.1942; 84,681 and 80,600 levels create cascade effects. Conversely, if BTC breaks 88,258 resistance (followed by 91,081 and 94,435), it triggers XLM 0.2119 breakout – falling BTC dominance supports alt rally.

BTC’s weak momentum (its own RSI around 45) adds risk for XLM: altcoins suffer harder in BTC corrections. To watch: BTC holding 86,502 gives breathing room to XLM supports, a break accelerates to 0.1398.

This analysis uses the market views and methodology of Chief Analyst Devrim Cacal.

Strategy Analyst: David Kim

Macro market analysis and portfolio management

This analysis is not investment advice. Do your own research.

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/analysis/xlm-market-commentary-critical-support-test-in-downtrend-on-january-27-2026

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 7, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — HitPaw, a leader in AI-powered visual enhancement solutions, announced Comfy, a global content creation platform, is
Share
AI Journal2026/02/08 09:15
Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

A Journalist gave a brutal review of the new Melania documentary, which has been criticized by those who say it won't make back the huge fees spent to make it,
Share
Rawstory2026/02/08 09:08
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00