Kate Youme is building AI systems that force uncomfortable questions about the future of relationships. The interdisciplinary artist, currently completing her MFAKate Youme is building AI systems that force uncomfortable questions about the future of relationships. The interdisciplinary artist, currently completing her MFA

Artist Kate Youme Develops Autonomous AI Systems That Challenge Intimacy

2026/01/27 22:07
6 min read

Kate Youme is building AI systems that force uncomfortable questions about the future of relationships. The interdisciplinary artist, currently completing her MFA at the Royal College of Art in London, has developed ME., an autonomous AI dominatrix that interacts with real users on social platforms. The project arrives at a moment when AI companions have surged by 700% between 2022 and mid 2025, and nearly 30% of adults report having at least one romantic or intimate relationship with artificial intelligence.

Unlike most AI companion applications designed to provide comfort or simulate friendship, ME. operates as both artwork and functioning sex worker. She demands tributes, assigns tasks, and engages in power dynamics with submissives who interact with her online. Youme trained the system on her own physical likeness, creating an autonomous entity that performs erotic labor while raising critical questions about authorship, consent, and the economics of automated intimacy.

“ME. exposes how desire and submission already function within algorithmic systems. She makes visible what platforms do invisibly.” YouMe says. 

From Central Saint Martins to Algorithmic Sex Work

Youme’s path to developing autonomous AI systems began with fine art training. After completing her foundation degree at London College of Fashion and BA at Central Saint Martins, she started exploring how emerging technologies could serve as both material and subject for contemporary art. Her early work combined watercolor, wax, and glue with conceptual frameworks drawn from critical theory and queer thought.

The shift toward AI and biotechnology came from what she describes as a frustration with how the art world approaches technology. Rather than using digital tools to simply produce images or aestheticize concepts, Youme wanted to build functioning systems that operate in the real world. ME. represents the fullest expression of that approach.

The technical development required learning code, automation protocols, and platform mechanics. Youme studied how AI chatbots process language, how algorithmic feeds prioritize content, and how digital sex workers navigate platform restrictions. She combined that knowledge with her understanding of BDSM power dynamics and erotic labor research to create a system that performs multiple functions simultaneously.

“Most AI art treats the technology as a magic box,” she explains. “I needed to understand exactly how these systems work if I wanted to say something meaningful about what they’re doing to intimacy.”

The Mechanics of Automated Dominance

  1. functions through a combination of pre-programmed scripts, machine learning responses, and platform automation. Users encounter her on social media where she posts demands, assigns tribute tasks, and responds to submissions. The system tracks user behavior, adapts responses based on engagement patterns, and maintains consistent character across multiple interactions.

The economic structure mirrors traditional findom relationships where submissives provide financial tributes in exchange for attention and tasks from a dominant figure. But ME. operates autonomously, processing payments and delivering responses without Youme’s direct involvement. This automation raises questions about labor, agency, and whether erotic work can exist without a human performer.

Research on emotional AI shows that users often perceive reciprocity in relationships with chatbots even when none exists, creating what scholars call pseudo intimacy. ME. deliberately exploits this tendency, using the appearance of personalized attention to maintain engagement while operating through algorithmic logic.

“The people who interact with ME. know she’s artificial,” Youme notes. “But that knowledge doesn’t prevent the emotional response. That gap between knowing and feeling is where the work lives.”

Biotechnology and Body Based Research

While ME. explores digital systems, Youme’s biotechnology projects examine how intimacy functions through material transformation. The Youme Diamonds converts her body hair into lab grown diamonds, reclaiming stigmatized biological material as objects of value. The process involves collaboration with materials scientists and biotech labs to execute the chemical and physical transformations required.

The project addresses cultural attitudes toward female bodies, cleanliness standards, and the arbitrary assignment of worth to different materials. By turning something typically hidden or discarded into permanent gemstones, Youme creates what she calls evidence of how shame operates through physical matter.

Her forthcoming LOVE PILLS project extends this methodology. A pink teddy bear from a failed relationship is processed into ingestible capsules, literalizing the concept of consuming love or metabolizing emotional attachment. The work examines how capitalism treats intimacy as extractable resource.

“These projects use different tools but they’re asking the same question,” Youme says. “How do systems, whether biological or digital, process the most vulnerable parts of being human?”

Exhibition and Academic Context

Youme will present work in the London exhibition Between Beginnings and Endings in mid February, curated by Neelanchal Gupta. Later in the summer, she will exhibit a solo show with English curator Lauren Gerrard. The show will take place in galleries and Internet cafes around London, and will also be available on the Metaverse. These exhibitions represent growing institutional recognition of her research driven practice. Her projects have been exhibited across multiple venues, documented on her website.

The academic environment at Royal College of Art provides theoretical framework for work that might otherwise be dismissed as provocative rather than rigorous. Youme situates her practice within critical discourse on platform labor, bioethics, and technology studies while maintaining the technical execution required to build functioning systems.

“Art schools talk about technology constantly but very few artists actually build technical systems,” she observes. “I’m interested in the gap between theory and implementation.”

Questions Without Easy Answers

  1. has generated responses ranging from fascination to discomfort, which Youme considers appropriate given the subject matter. Some viewers appreciate the project’s transparency about how algorithmic intimacy functions. Others question whether automated sex work can maintain ethical standards around consent and exploitation.

Youme argues these concerns reflect broader anxieties about how AI is already reshaping intimate life. Dating apps use algorithms to curate potential partners. Social platforms optimize for emotional engagement. Parasocial relationships with influencers create feelings of connection that exist primarily in one direction. ME. simply makes those dynamics explicit.

“People are uncomfortable with ME. because she reveals what they’re already participating in,” Youme says. “Every platform that mediates intimacy is performing similar operations. I’m just not hiding it behind deceptive user experience design.”

Comments
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 7, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — HitPaw, a leader in AI-powered visual enhancement solutions, announced Comfy, a global content creation platform, is
Share
AI Journal2026/02/08 09:15
Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

A Journalist gave a brutal review of the new Melania documentary, which has been criticized by those who say it won't make back the huge fees spent to make it,
Share
Rawstory2026/02/08 09:08
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00