ZachXBT reports receiving 0.6767 ETH worth about $2,000 from stolen U.S. government funds, linked to prior wallet breaches. 0.6767 ETH from stolen U.S. governmentZachXBT reports receiving 0.6767 ETH worth about $2,000 from stolen U.S. government funds, linked to prior wallet breaches. 0.6767 ETH from stolen U.S. government

ZachXBT Receives Stolen US Government ETH in Public Wallet

ZachXBT reports receiving 0.6767 ETH worth about $2,000 from stolen U.S. government funds, linked to prior wallet breaches.

0.6767 ETH from stolen U.S. government funds has landed in the public wallet of blockchain investigator ZachXBT.

The transfer, disclosed on January 26, 2026, was traced to a threat actor linked to earlier government wallet breaches.

Transfer of 0.6767 ETH to a Public Wallet

On January 26, 2026, blockchain investigator ZachXBT disclosed that he received 0.6767 ETH in his public wallet.

According to Cointelegraph, the ether was valued at about $2,000 at the time of the transfer, based on market prices.

ZachXBT stated that the funds were sent by an individual using the name John Daghita. He said Daghita is also known online by the aliases “John” and “Lick,” which have appeared in prior online discussions.

According to ZachXBT, the ether was transferred without prior contact or consent.

He explained that the transaction occurred during an online dispute involving individuals linked to cybercrime activity.

ZachXBT said the sender used the transfer as a public display of wallet control. He described the action as part of an attempt to show access to funds during the dispute.

The investigator stated that the ether originated from stolen U.S. government funds.

He linked the transaction to addresses connected to earlier breaches of government-controlled wallets.

ZachXBT also said he does not intend to keep the funds. He announced plans to forward the 0.6767 ETH to an official U.S. government seizure address once the process is completed.

“Band for Band” Dispute and Wallet Exposure

The transfer followed a recorded argument that took place in a Telegram group chat. The discussion involved two individuals known within online cybercrime communities.

The exchange centered on a dispute commonly referred to as “band for band.” This term is used to describe situations where participants display wallet balances. The goal is to show control over large amounts of cryptocurrency.

Both individuals attempted to demonstrate financial dominance during the exchange. Wallet screenshots and live transfers were used to support their claims.

During the chat, the individual known as “Lick” shared his screen with the group. He displayed an Exodus wallet interface during the recording.

The shared wallet showed a Tron blockchain address. The address held cryptocurrency valued at approximately $2.3 million at the time of the dispute.

The screen sharing allowed viewers to see the wallet balance in real time. The display was later used by investigators to trace related blockchain activity.

Related Reading: ZachXBT Identifies Suspicious Address Linked to Hundreds of Crypto Wallets Losing Funds Across Chains

According to ZachXBT, the traced address had received about $24.9 million in March 2024 from a U.S. government wallet. That wallet held digital assets seized during prior criminal investigations.

Blockchain records show the funds originated from wallets linked to the Bitfinex hack seizure. Those assets had been under government control following earlier recovery efforts.

ZachXBT had previously monitored activity tied to these wallets. In October 2024, he reported unusual and unexpected movements involving the seized funds.

During that period, roughly $20 million was transferred out of government-controlled addresses. The movements raised concerns due to their speed and lack of public explanation.

Most of the transferred funds were returned within 24 hours. However, about $700,000 sent through instant exchange services was not recovered.

The remaining missing funds were difficult to trace due to rapid swaps. Blockchain data showed they passed through services with limited transparency.

The post ZachXBT Receives Stolen US Government ETH in Public Wallet appeared first on Live Bitcoin News.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
What Is Zero Knowledge Proof (ZKP)? Inside The Blockchain Network Built for Private Computation & Secure Data Sharing

What Is Zero Knowledge Proof (ZKP)? Inside The Blockchain Network Built for Private Computation & Secure Data Sharing

Dive into Zero Knowledge Proof’s privacy-first blockchain, infrastructure, and presale auction system. Plus, see why analysts are calling it the best crypto to
Share
CoinLive2026/01/28 01:00
UNI Technical Analysis Jan 27

UNI Technical Analysis Jan 27

The post UNI Technical Analysis Jan 27 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. UNI is stabilizing around 4.69$ amid intraday fluctuations, with a short-term downtrend
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/28 01:26