The European Commission has opened formal proceedings against Elon Musk’s social media platform X after its artificial intelligence chatbot Grok was found producingThe European Commission has opened formal proceedings against Elon Musk’s social media platform X after its artificial intelligence chatbot Grok was found producing

European Commission launches formal proceedings against xAI's Grok AI chatbot

The European Commission has opened formal proceedings against Elon Musk’s social media platform X after its artificial intelligence chatbot Grok was found producing sexual images of real people without their permission, including pictures of children.

People using X have been making AI-altered versions of actual photographs by asking Grok to create them. A study released last week by the Centre for Countering Digital Hate found that Grok made roughly three million deepfake images of women and children in just a few days.

The controversy has prompted calls for investigations in several countries. In Ireland, a number of government ministers have closed their X accounts in response.

Regina Doherty, a member of the European Parliament from Fine Gael, confirmed the Commission’s move against the company in a statement released this morning. She said she supported the decision to start a formal investigation.

“When credible reports emerge of AI systems being used in ways that harm women and children, it is essential that EU law is examined and enforced without delay,” Doherty said.

She added that the case brings up serious concerns about whether platforms are following their legal responsibilities to check for risks and stop illegal and harmful material from spreading.

Doherty emphasized that the investigation needs to result in actual consequences.

“No company operating in the EU is above the law,” she stated.

She also pointed out that the situation shows bigger problems in how new AI technology is being regulated and monitored, asking for more steps to be taken at the EU level.

“This case underlines why the AI Act must remain a living piece of legislation. If gaps in enforcement or oversight become clear, then it is our responsibility to address them. EU laws must be enforceable in real time when serious harms occur,” Doherty said.

Investigation delayed due to Greenland crisis

According to German news source Handelsblatt, the Commission had planned to start the proceedings under the EU’s Digital Services Act last Monday, but the decision was pushed back as the bloc dealt with US President Donald Trump’s threats to take over Greenland.

This is not the first time X has faced trouble with EU regulators. In December 2025, the platform received a €120 million fine from the EU for breaking the Digital Services Act. The violations included misleading blue checkmarks, not being transparent about advertising, and preventing researchers from accessing the platform.

Trump administration officials had strong words about that fine. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Vice President JD Vance both criticized it heavily, calling it an attack on American technology platforms.

Focus on risk assessment and content moderation

The latest investigation focuses specifically on whether X properly assessed the risks of its AI chatbot and took enough steps to prevent the creation and spread of harmful content. The Digital Services Act requires large online platforms to identify and address risks related to illegal content and harm to users.

The rapid production of such a large volume of inappropriate images in such a short time period raised alarm bells among digital safety advocates and lawmakers.

The situation has become a test case for how EU regulations will handle emerging AI technologies. While the AI Act has been passed to govern artificial intelligence systems, this case is being pursued under the Digital Services Act, which covers online platform responsibilities.

The investigation could lead to additional fines or requirements for X to change how Grok operates. The Commission has the power to impose penalties of up to six percent of a company’s global annual revenue for serious violations of the Digital Services Act.

X has not yet publicly commented on the new investigation. The company’s handling of the situation will be closely watched as other countries consider their own regulatory responses. Multiple nations have already demanded urgent action to address the chatbot’s ability to create inappropriate images.

Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
What Is Zero Knowledge Proof (ZKP)? Inside The Blockchain Network Built for Private Computation & Secure Data Sharing

What Is Zero Knowledge Proof (ZKP)? Inside The Blockchain Network Built for Private Computation & Secure Data Sharing

Dive into Zero Knowledge Proof’s privacy-first blockchain, infrastructure, and presale auction system. Plus, see why analysts are calling it the best crypto to
Share
CoinLive2026/01/28 01:00
UNI Technical Analysis Jan 27

UNI Technical Analysis Jan 27

The post UNI Technical Analysis Jan 27 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. UNI is stabilizing around 4.69$ amid intraday fluctuations, with a short-term downtrend
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/28 01:26